Study: Fire Will Pose Greater Risk to California Homes in Years Ahead

Forecast: warmer, drier and more of us in harm’s way

The towering flames of the Robbers fire, which burned 2,600 acres and destroyed five buildings in Placer County in July. A new UC Merced report says such fires may double in the next 40 years because of urban growth and warming temperatures.

As notices begin to arrive in the mail to nearly 850,000 California residences in fire-prone areas for Cal Fire’s controversial new fire prevention fee, a study out of the University of California Merced offers a powerful rationale for beefing up the state’s wildland firefighting resources.

Warmer average temperatures coupled with urban growth will greatly increase wildfire risk to California homes in the decades to come, according to the new UC study [PDF] prepared for the California Energy Commission.

Lead author and environmental engineering professor Anthony Westerling, says wildfire risk to California homes may double over the next 40 years because of a combination of climate change, land alteration and urban development.

The report supports the findings of several other studies released earlier this year showing a correlation between warming Western temperatures and increased fire activity. The study projects that climate change will generally increase fire risk across the state, with the greatest threat posed to forests in the foothills and mountains of Northern California.

The interplay among climate, people and fires is complex. In some cases, according to the report, factors contributing to fire risk may even cancel out. For example, development may reduce the volume of flammable material available to fuel large fires but the corresponding increase in population will up the probability of human ignitions.

Even with large-scale efforts to reduce carbon emissions, Westerling says that some level of warming is inevitable and that the state must work to phase in sound policies to mitigate growing risk to property.

“While policies to mitigate climate change could help to limit changes in wildfire, some level of additional warming is going to occur regardless, requiring adaptation,” Westerling said in a press release.  “Fire suppression, fuels management and development policies such as zoning and building codes are the primary means we have to manage wildfire risks.”

[module align=”left” width=”half” type=”pull-quote”]“When you have 11 of the 20 most damaging wildfires in California history happening since 2002, that tells us where things are going.”[/module]

The findings grabbed the attention of Cal Fire director Ken Pimlott, who spoke with Climate Watch senior editor Craig Miller last week. “When you have 11 of the 20 most damaging wildfires in California history happening since 2002, that tells us where things are going,” said Pimlott.

He noted that the models in the report are confirmed by the experience of fire crews in the field. “The computer models are helping us validate the things our firefighters and the public are seeing, real-time, on the ground,” said Pimlott. “We need to be responding to that now and into the future ”

Cal Fire’s fire prevention fee will be assessed on California homeowners living at fire-prone boundaries with open space.  The fee, which has been met with protests in Marin County and derided by critics as an “illegal tax,” will hit California homeowners with a maximum annual charge of $150 and is expected to generate around $84 million in revenue for the agency.

Study: Fire Will Pose Greater Risk to California Homes in Years Ahead 6 August,2012Jeremy Miller

7 thoughts on “Study: Fire Will Pose Greater Risk to California Homes in Years Ahead”

  1. Cal Fire – over rated and over paid.

    Just a bad excuse to add money to their budget.

    I wonder if the Director has a budget like the State
    Parks – two weeks ago, we find out that $54 million was hidden by them. All the
    while they were closing parks and administering new user fees. Special
    interest groups where lobbing for more funds….

    I call BS!

    Keep them at the level they are at now and hire contract
    wild land fire fighting companies. This then, might help the state’s economy!

    1. You must be a private contractor trying to get work. Because you really don’t know a thing about CAL FIRE, by the way you talk. Ignorant people like yourself are the reason misinformation goes around. Stop trying to support and make yourself feel better on the backs of hard working middle class firefighters who do the job everyday. If you knew anything at all about the job and the pay that CAL FIRE employees make, you would not have typed what you did. So keep you mouth shut , and you think you can do the Job apply and do it otherwise SHUT UP you fool


  2. I hope CDF will use my money to pay home depot people to burn the fuel smokey the bear has built up over the last century. This smacks of protection money. Don’t pay and your house will burn down. I don’t know about you but CDf has nothing for me.

  3. Maybe I can charge CDF for the water I am storing on my property for them. Right.

Comments are closed.


Jeremy Miller

Jeremy Miller is a contributing editor for High Country News, and his stories have appeared in numerous publications including Harper's, Orion, Men's Journal, Earth Island Journal, The Boston Globe and The San Francisco Chronicle Sunday Magazine. He currently lives in the East Bay with his wife, Emma, and children, Deirdre and Owen.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor