Should California Put Hybrids Back in the Carpool Lane?

You’d think that kicking thousands of solo drivers out of the carpool lane would make traffic move faster…at least for carpoolers. But you’d be wrong, according to researchers from UC Berkeley.

In 2005, California granted drivers of hybrid vehicles access to carpool lanes (regardless of the number of riders) as a way to spur adoption of low-emissions vehicles. But that program ended this summer, after critics argued that the 85,000 cars that had qualified for special lane access were too many, and all the new hybrid drivers were clogging things up for carpoolers.

But instead of returning the roads to smooth sailing for carpools, the change actually slowed traffic for everybody, reducing speed as much as 15% in the “high-occupancy vehicle” (HOV) lanes themselves, according to the Berkeley study.

The researchers found that the speed in the carpool lane is affected by the speed of cars in the adjacent lane. So, if the regular lanes are more congested and creeping along at a snail’s pace, carpoolers are less likely to be blasting past them at 70 miles per hour.

Their conclusion?  Let more cars into the carpool lane, not fewer, and everyone will move faster.

Should California Put Hybrids Back in the Carpool Lane? 2 February,2018Gretchen Weber

4 thoughts on “Should California Put Hybrids Back in the Carpool Lane?”

  1. No way!
    Solo drivers should not be allowed. Period.
    Hybrids are still cars, and should not be given privileges. Those hybrids do ultimately add-up to traffic, contributing to the gridlock.
    People should be encouraged to STOP driving and polluting the air. We should focus on creating mass transit and bicycle conditions, and stop wasting money on those useless carpool lanes.

  2. Solo drivers should NOT be allowed in the carpool lane for free. They should pay for the right to use the lane.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor