Some comments focus on the modest educational requirements for positions like train operator and station agent:

So now, let's look at suggested remedies from the audience. Here's a list based on my estimate of how frequently the idea has been suggested.

1. Fire and/or lock out all the workers and replace them. We've already heard from this camp above, but here's another comment for good measure:

2. Pass laws to ban strikes by workers at BART and other transit agencies. This is an idea that's clearly gaining popularity with both Republicans in the state Legislature and an East Bay Assembly candidate pushing for a change in state law:

3. Automate BART trains so they don't need unionized drivers anymore. Commenters like to point out that the Bay Area is the center of universal technological innovation (except for all those bullet trains and cool transit systems in Japan, France, Germany, China and Britain). This idea isn't so far out. Vancouver, B.C., already has such a system. And as a recent article in TechCrunch pointed out, Paris has installed a driverless system on one of its Metro lines and London's studying the idea for its underground. Here's a comment that mixes a couple of our themes:

4. Form a riders' union to "strike back" against BART workers' union. Again, this isn't a wacky idea. For instance, riders' groups have formed in San Francisco, Seattle and other cities. (What's unknown to me, frankly, is how effective they are in influencing transportation policy and whether they have the clout to effectively participate in contract battles.)

Is there a counter-trend? Pro-union people coming to the defense of the union's and the idea of collective bargaining? There is, but compared to the volume typically employed by the anti-strikers, they're speaking in a whisper:

public opinionpublic opinion

New Poll Suggests San Franciscans Support Tech Shuttles -- This Month

The Commenters Speak: How They'd Deal With BART Strike