upper waypoint

Uber Says Gig Worker Law Doesn't Apply to Drivers

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

In a direct challenge to the gig worker bill that passed in the state Assembly on Wednesday, Uber said its drivers are not a core part of the company's "technology platform."

Why does Uber say that drivers aren't a core part of its business?

Because Assembly Bill 5 codifies a 2018 state Supreme Court decision that says if workers perform core functions for the business, they have to be classified as employees, not contractors.

I wonder if now that Uber says the drivers aren't performing a core function, it'll classify those cars as self-driving?

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
At Least 16 People Died in California After Medics Injected Sedatives During Police EncountersPro-Palestinian Protests Sweep Bay Area College Campuses Amid Surging National MovementCalifornia Regulators Just Approved New Rule to Cap Health Care Costs. Here's How It Works9 California Counties Far From Universities Struggle to Recruit Teachers, Says ReportWomen at Troubled East Bay Prison Forced to Relocate Across the CountryLess Than 1% of Santa Clara County Contracts Go to Black and Latino Businesses, Study ShowsUS Department of Labor Hails Expanded Protections for H-2A Farmworkers in Santa RosaAs Border Debate Shifts Right, Sen. Alex Padilla Emerges as Persistent Counterforce for ImmigrantsCalifornia Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesInheriting a Home in California? Here's What You Need to Know