Candidates Vie to Separate Themselves in Crowded East Bay Assembly Race

Candidates running for the 15th Assembly District appear at a forum in Berkeley on February 11, 2018.

Candidates running for the 15th Assembly District appear at a forum in Berkeley on Feb. 11, 2018. (Guy Marzorati/KQED)

A crowded field of candidates running in one of the most competitive legislative races in the Bay Area are hoping to distinguish themselves with voters before the June primary.

It’s a challenge, considering that most of the Democrats running in the 15th Assembly District (which includes North Oakland, Berkeley and Richmond) are in lock-step on issues like housing, health care and education.

At a candidate forum held in Berkeley on Sunday, the only daylight that emerged was between the eight candidates on stage and one who wasn’t — Buffy Wicks, a former Obama and Clinton campaign strategist who was unable to attend because of a family emergency.

Wicks raised a whopping $520,124 last year, far ahead of the field. Sunday’s forum, sponsored by Berkeley Citizens Action, the Berkeley Progressive Alliance and the Berkeley Tenants Union, was the first gathering of candidates after the filing of 2017 campaign finance reports.

Berkeley School Board member Judy Appel accused Wicks of raising money from big corporations and donors outside the district.

“I really believe that you should not be able to buy a seat in the Assembly,” Appel said.

Wicks’ fundraising report from 2017 shows no donations from corporations, while Appel received $2,500 from Verizon Wireless.

The line of attack regarding out-of-district donors seems to carry more weight. Less than 10 percent of Wicks’ donations and cash come from ZIP codes within the 15th District.

In a statement, Wicks said she was “shocked to learn that one of my opponents had taken the opportunity to lie about my candidacy and campaign.”

She added that “the voters of AD-15 deserve constructive debates over policy and how we’re going to address housing, homelessness, educational inequities, and more.”

While the candidates appearing at Sunday’s forum did little to differentiate their policy positions, Wicks has taken stances on housing and education that stand apart from the field.

In a questionnaire provided by event organizers that asked about positions on education, Wicks said “we should meet students where they are … through traditional public schools, public charter schools, community colleges, as well as our CSUs and UCs.”

But when candidates at Sunday’s forum were asked whether they support charter schools, no one raised their hand.

Richmond Vice Mayor Jovanka Beckles said she would propose a statewide moratorium on charter schools, a position supported by other candidates on the panel.

“Charter schools are what is sucking the life blood out of our public school system,” said Beckles, who received the endorsement of the groups sponsoring the event.

Wicks has also said that she favors reforming, not repealing, the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which limits the ability of cities to implement rent control.

A bill to repeal Costa-Hawkins failed in a state legislative committee earlier this year.

“If I could have been sitting on that committee, maybe things would have been different,” said El Cerrito Mayor Pro Tem Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto. “I think we definitely need to repeal it.”

All other candidates on stage favored repeal, including Berkeley City Councilman Ben Bartlett, compliance officer Cheryl Sudduth, EBMUD Director Andy Katz, writer Owen Poindexter and Oakland City Councilman Dan Kalb.

Republican candidate Pranav Jandhyala was not at the forum.

The two candidates with the most votes in the June primary will advance to the general election in November.

The district’s current assemblyman, Tony Thurmond, is running for state schools superintendent.

Candidates Vie to Separate Themselves in Crowded East Bay Assembly Race 12 February,2018Guy Marzorati

  • James Mcfadden

    The biased, and possibly racist, KQED reporting in the written article is just as bad as the broadcast I heard.
    The written article focuses almost entirely on the corporate candidate Buffy Wicks, mentioning her name 9 times.
    Buffy Wicks received 0 votes at this forum.
    Judy Appel, another white woman, is mentioned 3 times.

    Appel finished 5th in first round voting – getting 1/11 the number of votes that Beckles received.
    Beckles name only appears 2 times.
    Beckles garnered 5 times the number of first choice votes as the next candidate, Ben Bartlett.
    Beckles won the endorsement, which required 60% of the vote, on the second round of rank choice balloting.

    Why is KQED focussing on the corporate candidate?

    This is totally biased reporting.

  • Kathleen Wimer

    James Mcfadden is exactly correct. Not only does the reporter mention the one candidate absent from the candidates’ forum he’s ostensibly covering more than any other. He does not name the three organizations who organized and sponsored the forum: the Berkeley Progressive Alliance, the Berkeley Tenants Union, and Berkeley Action Group. The article fails to mention the tremendous momentum the Sunday endorsement victory for Jovanka Beckles represents (see http://www.jovanka.org/endorsements). Reminds one of the short shrift the media gave Bernie Sanders’ astonishing campaign.

  • Susan Hybloom

    Even if Buffy Wicks had been in the room she would have not fared well with these progressive groups. Why the author focused on her is beyond me. The winner of the BPA-BTU-
    BCA endorsements, Jovanka Beckles, has a proven track record of progressive victories on the Richmond City Council. Let’s give this stellar candidate her due!

Author

Guy Marzorati

Guy Marzorati is a reporter and producer for KQED News, the California Report and KQED’s California Politics and Government Desk. Guy joined KQED in 2013. He grew up in New York and graduated from Santa Clara University. Email: GMarzorati@KQED.org

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor