Poll Finds Backing for Toll Hikes on Bay Area Bridges, Even From Those Who’d Be Paying More

Traffic backs up at the Bay Bridge toll plaza.

Traffic backs up at the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

It’s hard to get 85 percent of people to agree on anything — even whether the Earth goes around the sun.

But 85 is the percentage of people in a new Metropolitan Transportation Commission poll who agree traffic has gotten worse here in the past year.

That widely shared perception of traffic congestion misery probably explains the main finding of the MTC poll: Regional Measure 3, a toll increase proposal likely headed for the June ballot in the nine Bay Area counties, enjoys solid majority support.

RM3 would authorize toll hikes of up to $3 on the region’s seven state-owned bridges (the Antioch, Bay, Benicia, Carquinez, Dumbarton, Richmond-San Rafael and San Mateo spans). The expected $4.45 billion in new revenue over the next 25 years would help pay for about three dozen transit and highway projects throughout the Bay Area.

The poll released Wednesday, conducted by Oakland-based EMC Research between Nov. 27 and Dec. 11, asked respondents about three different scenarios: a $1 toll increase that would take effect in 2019; a $2 hike, with the second dollar taking effect in 2023 ; and a $3 rise, with the third dollar taking effect in 2027. (See EMC’s poll presentation and questions at end of post.)

By the way, that last option already has what might turn out to be a campaign nickname: “One plus one plus one.”

The survey found regional support for all three options, with 56 percent saying they’d support the $1 hike, 57 percent supporting the $2 increase and 52 percent backing the $3 rise. Those numbers were higher when respondents had heard more about what the tolls would pay for: 60 percent said they’d vote for a $1 or $3 increase, with 64 percent backing the $2 increase.

The toll increases also appear to enjoy substantial support among those who would be paying them every day.

The poll found that frequent toll payers — those who use the bridges at least once a week — back all three increase scenarios with at least 55 percent backing. The same held true for occasional toll payers and those who rarely or never cross the bridges.

“I think it’s fair to say we were pleasantly surprised by the degree of support,” Jake Mackenzie, a Rohnert Park City Council member who represents Sonoma County and serves as MTC chair, said after a public workshop on Regional Measure 3 on Wednesday.

He said he felt that the apparent backing of the toll increases reflects public understanding that the Bay Area will need to pay its own way for transportation improvements.

“I’m not sure what help we’re going to continue to get from the federal government — they talk about an infrastructure bill,” Mackenzie said. “But this is basically self-help Bay Area, self-help California.”

RM3 would require a simple regional majority to pass — 50 percent plus one vote among all ballots cast in the nine-county region.

The toll plan was most popular in Alameda, San Francisco and San Mateo counties, with 60 percent or more saying yes to the $1 and $2 scenarios and between 52 and 59 percent supporting a $3 increase.

There’s substantially less enthusiasm for the increases in three counties: Contra Costa, Napa and Solano.

Some elected officials in Contra Costa, including Rep. Mark DeSaulnier and Assemblyman Tim Grayson, have argued that East Bay residents will pay significantly more in increased tolls than their communities will get back in benefits.

The MTC poll found that just 44 percent of Contra Costa respondents would support a $3 toll increase, while 46 percent would back a $1 bump and 47 percent a $2 hike.

Napa/Solano respondents were similarly cool to the toll increases, with support for the increases in the 42 percent to 46 percent range.

The hybrid telephone-web poll included responses from 4,151 people who identified themselves as likely to vote in the June 2018 primary. The sample was weighted to reflect the expected June nine-county electorate. The margin of error for the overall sample was plus or minus 2.6 percentage points; the error margin for each county or subregion was plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Other key poll findings:

  • Respondents were evenly split — at 42 percent — on the question of whether the region is “generally going in the right direction … or pretty seriously on the wrong track.
  • Respondents’ top three regional concerns: Affordable housing (21 percent), traffic congestion (14 percent), homelessness (9 percent).
  • Sixty percent of respondents said their primary mode of commuting is driving alone; 12 percent said they commute most often by public transportation; 1 percent named Uber or Lyft as their primary mode.
  • Top transportation priorities: 79 percent of respondents ranked reducing truck congestion and improving air quality as very important or somewhat important; 76 percent said purchasing new BART cars and extending BART to Silicon Valley was very or somewhat important.

The MTC commissioners — acting in their role as the Bay Area Toll Authority — are expected to decide next month on the amount of the Regional Measure 3 toll increase and how it will be phased in. The deadline is in March for the Bay Area’s nine county boards of supervisors to place the measure on the ballot.

Poll Finds Backing for Toll Hikes on Bay Area Bridges, Even From Those Who’d Be Paying More 29 December,2017Dan Brekke

  • JustJake

    KQED pushing this “push poll”… expected more from you. MTC is well known to be disingenuous in their attempts to gain control over Bay Area lifestyle decisions.

    • Dan Brekke

      Reporting on it, not pushing it. In what sense is this a “push poll”? The questions are embedded in the second document above. Cite a specific example.


Dan Brekke

Dan Brekke is a blogger, reporter and editor for KQED News, responsible for online breaking news coverage of topics ranging from California water issues to the Bay Area’s transportation challenges. In a newsroom career that began in Chicago in 1972, Dan has worked as a city and foreign/national editor for The San Francisco Examiner, editor at Wired News, deputy editor at Wired magazine, managing editor at TechTV as well as for several Web startups.

Since joining KQED in 2007, Dan has reported, edited and produced both radio and online features and breaking news pieces. He has shared in two Society of Professional Journalists Norcal Excellence in Journalism awards — for his 2012 reporting on a KQED Science series on water and power in California, and in 2014, for KQED’s comprehensive reporting on the south Napa earthquake.

In addition to his 44 years of on-the-job education, Dan is a lifelong student of history and is still pursuing an undergraduate degree.

Email Dan at: dbrekke@kqed.org

Twitter: twitter.com/danbrekke
Facebook: www.facebook.com/danbrekke
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/danbrekke

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor