upper waypoint

Recall Effort Can Proceed for Judge in Brock Turner Case

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Santa Clara County Judge Aaron Persky was recalled in an election June 2018 after he sentenced an ex-Stanford University swimmer to six months in jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman. (Jason Doiy/The Recorder)

A recall campaign to oust the judge under fire for his handling of a sexual assault case involving Stanford University swimmer Brock Turner can resume, a judge ruled Monday.

Retired San Francisco County Judge Kay Tsenin agreed with the recall campaign that the county — not the state — has authority over the recall of Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky.

Persky drew criticism nationwide after he sentenced Turner to just six months in jail for sexually assaulting a woman who had passed out behind a trash bin near a fraternity house. Turner was released after serving three months.

The ruling on the recall is tentative and a final ruling is expected to be issued Thursday.

Michele Dauber, a Stanford University law professor who has led the recall effort, thanked the judge for a ruling that "validates what we've been saying all along, that Judge Persky filed a frivolous lawsuit the goal of which was to stall and delay the democratic process."

Sponsored

Persky's attorney, Elizabeth Pipkin, said in a statement that they "are hopeful the court will change its tentative ruling after considering our arguments." Persky had previously spoken out briefly about the recall effort, writing, “California law requires every judge to consider rehabilitation and probation for first-time offenders … and I took an oath to follow it without regard to public opinion.”

The Santa Clara County registrar permitted recall proponents to begin collecting signatures earlier this month to qualify the issue for the June ballot. But Persky's attorneys filed a lawsuit arguing that proponents should have filed with California's secretary of state because county judges are state officers. This week's ruling means the recall effort registered with the county can proceed.

Supporters of the recall must now collect 90,000 signatures and be certified for the ballot by March 9 in order to appear on the June ballot.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
State Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some WorkersCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Erik Aadahl on the Power of Sound in FilmFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailKQED Youth Takeover: How Can San Jose Schools Create Safer Campuses?How to Attend a Rally Safely in the Bay Area: Your Rights, Protections and the PoliceWill Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?Rainn Wilson from ‘The Office’ on Why We Need a Spiritual RevolutionNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSilicon Valley House Seat Race Gets a Recount