With Caltrain Project in Danger, Bay Area Delegation Plans Lobbying Trip to D.C.

Caltrain's modernized electric trains would begin service in 2021.  The system -- a vital commuter rail link between  San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties  -- currently carries 65,000 riders a day.

Caltrain's modernized electric trains would begin service in 2021. The system -- a vital commuter rail link between San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties -- currently carries 65,000 riders a day. (Image courtesy of Caltrain)

Every year, delegations of Bay Area transportation officials and business leaders travel to Washington, D.C., to lobby for federal dollars around the same time as the American Public Transportation Association’s annual legislative conference.

This year, with worries that the Trump administration may pull the plug on $647 million to electrify Caltrain just as the project was set to start construction, the Bay Area groups will go all out when they travel to the nation’s capital March 12.

“We’re using every single leverage and contact point we have as a Bay Area and as a political infrastructure to try to make a difference on this subject,” said Randy Rentschler, the legislative and public affairs director for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

The Silicon Valley delegation will include some heavyweights, including executives from nearly 70 firms, from global powerhouses to startups, who will make the case to Democratic and Republican members of Congress and administration officials.

Companies like Google, Facebook and Genentech have already been reaching out, said Chris O’Connor, the senior director of transportation at the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, which is organizing a trip.

“This project really is one of the biggest local priorities for this very important business community, which drives innovation across the entire country,” said O’Connor.

The mayors of San Jose, Palo Alto and Sunnyvale, along with other local elected officials, will join the lobbying effort, which grows out of a partisan political fight over California’s high-speed rail system.

Last month, the 14 Republicans in California’s delegation to the House of Representatives sent a letter to new Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao urging her to block any further funding of California high-speed rail. That would include the $647 million federal share of the Caltrain electrification work.

“We think providing additional funding at this time to the authority would be an irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars,” the letter said. It called for no further funds to be granted until “a full and complete audit of the project and its finances can be conducted.”

That letter drew a rebuttal from California’s Democratic congressional delegation, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris. They said the GOP contingent’s demand would kill a project that, while it could be used by bullet trains in the future, is separate from the high-speed rail project.

That point was hammered home in a Feb. 3 letter defending the project.

“Rail service has operated on this corridor for over 150 years and for decades Caltrain has sought to electrify this line to replace aging diesel engines,” the Democrats’ letter stated.

Chao delayed the funding decision, as the Republicans requested, with the Federal Transit Administration issuing a statement Feb. 17 that said it was “deferring a decision” on the modernization funds “to be considered in conjunction with the development of the president’s” budget.

Caltrain’s $1.9 billion modernization project will allow the transit agency to switch from diesel-hauled engines to faster, quieter and more efficient electric trains by 2021. It will help boost the system’s ridership by about 70 percent by 2040.

“This is a really important project for the Bay Area at an important time when our region, and especially the part of the region that delivers over half the gross domestic product of the overall Bay Area, the 101 corridor, is experiencing terrible, terrible congestion,” said Jim Wunderman, president of the Bay Area Council.

The electrification project was scheduled to begin construction Wednesday. On Monday, Caltrain officials announced that they were able to renegotiate the project’s schedule with contractors, getting an extension until June 30. Not only is the delay a setback, but it will tack on a cost of $20 million.

Seamus Murphy, Caltrain’s communications director, said the new timeline will allow the Trump administration time to make its decision.

“We think it will be approved and we’ll be able to move this project forward,” Murphy told KQED’s Forum last Friday. “If we aren’t able to do that for some reason, we would need to think about alternative sources of funding and we would have that conversation when the time is appropriate.”

Murphy said one factor that weighs in favor of the project is that it would create 9,600 jobs in 15 states. The transit agency has launched a petition that urges the president to give the green light.

Though Trump hasn’t publicly laid out a transportation agenda, he has hinted that his infrastructure goals would include high-speed rail. But there have been reports that the administration may take a page from a proposal by the conservative Heritage Foundation and gut transit funding.

Wunderman of the Bay Area Council said he has had conversations with House Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, who agreed Caltrain electrification is a “viable and valued project,” but opposes it because of its ties to high-speed rail.

O’Connor said previous threats to cut federal transit funding have split the Republican caucus because “many Republican elected leaders have served as mayors and supervisors before joining Congress and realize how important it is to have federal investment in transportation infrastructure.”

The delegation, which is seeking a meeting with Transportation Secretary Chao, plans to make it clear to both Republicans and Democrats how important the Caltrain electrification funding is to Silicon Valley and in promoting new economic corridors and facilitating commerce, said O’Connor.

“We do think it’s a very strong argument with many Republicans who don’t agree with the Heritage Foundation’s recommendations precisely,” he said.

Author

Bryan Goebel

Bryan Goebel is a reporter focused on transportation and housing issues. He was previously the editor of Streetsblog San Francisco, and an anchor/editor at KCBS Radio. He's a lifelong Californian and has also worked at radio stations in Barstow, Redding and Sacramento.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor