Democrats aren’t wasting any time making it clear they plan to stand up to President-elect Donald Trump. On the Legislature’s opening day this week, both the Senate and Assembly condemned Trump’s campaign rhetoric before passing resolutions expressing opposition to his call for mass deportation of undocumented immigrants.

Several Republicans criticized their colleagues for acting before Trump is even sworn in. But Senate leader Kevin de León says Californians need to be reassured.

“It’s not our responsibility to read the tea leaves and predict what the president-elect may or may not do or what his administration may or may not do,” he said. “It’s our moral responsibility as senators, as Assembly members, to do everything within our power to protect our constituents.”

To that end, de León has authored a bill that would prohibit state and local authorities from using their resources to help federal officials with deportations. Democrats have also introduced a bill to better train defense attorneys on immigration law and another to fund legal representation for people facing deportation. Both of those bills are urgency measures, meaning they would take effect immediately if they muster a two-thirds vote.

Democrats hold a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and Assembly. The programs are expected to cost millions of dollars.

Still, Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon says lawmakers have an obligation to protect the interests of vulnerable Californians.

“It is increasingly apparent that those interests will not be a concern for the next president — for the bullies, bigots and billionaires he has chosen for his Cabinet — or for the majority in Congress that is already salivating at the prospect of ending Medicare,” Rendon said.

Gov. Jerry Brown has said he agrees the state needs to protect its interests, but wants to see what Trump does before taking action. And that’s assuming the state takes any action at all. In fact, UC Davis law professor Carlton Larson says a U.S. Supreme Court decision would allow California officials to take the route of passive resistance to congressional actions they disagree with.

“If California officials simply want to sit back and not lift a finger with respect to federal immigration laws or any other federal law, they don’t have to,” Larson said. “The federal government can’t force state officers to enforce federal law. So that’s a fairly significant power.”

Larson notes California can’t actively obstruct federal law, and if the federal government uses its own officers to enforce the law, there’s not much the state can do about it.

And there may not be much Republicans in the Legislature can do to block Democrats’ actions. But they can show their displeasure. Rather than support the re-election of Assembly Speaker Rendon, as they did when he was first elected, Assembly Republicans chose instead to back Minority Leader Chad Mayes for the post.

Mayes says he doesn’t agree with the combative tone state Democrats have taken toward Trump.

“I’ve been disappointed over the last couple of weeks to see some of the leaders of their party say some pretty abrasive things,” he said. “And the fact remains President-elect Trump is going to be the president and we’re going to have to work with him.”

Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller, who was a Trump delegate at this year’s Republican National Convention, says the state party could benefit from the GOP-controlled federal government

“Because, nationally, the Republicans will be setting the agenda and we work very closely with them, we think we’ll be solving problems as the new agenda begins to surface and policy takes a different tack in the United States,” she said.

Fuller, who represents Bakersfield, said her district could benefit from Trump’s promise to keep more jobs in the country.

  • Hillary Clintub

    Yay! There’s hope that California may become a real state again once they get rid of the Dystopian Kingdom of Fruits and Nuts.

  • jskdn

    Except that they are actively obstructing federal immigration law, lording their own immigration policies over those of the feds. A sanctuary is a place of protection from something and in the case of California and its various jurisdiction, that something is the federal prerogative regarding immigration.

  • Junior V

    passive leadership is better than no leadership at all on facing up to trump expectations. Kevin is right in seeking to protect us.

Author

Katie Orr

Katie Orr is a Sacramento-based reporter for KQED's Politics and Government  Desk, covering the state Capitol and a variety of issues including women in politics, voting and elections and legislation. Prior to joining KQED in 2016, Katie was state government reporter for Capital Public Radio in Sacramento. She's also worked for KPBS in San Diego, where she covered City Hall.

Katie received her masters degree in political science from San Diego State University and holds a Bachelors degree in broadcast journalism from Arizona State University.

In 2015 Katie won a national Clarion Award for a series of stories she did on women in California politics. She's been honored by the Society for Professional Journalists and, in 2013, was named by The Washington Post as one of the country's top state Capitol reporters.   She's also reported for the award-winning documentary series The View from Here and was part of the team that won  national PRNDI and  Gabriel Awards in 2015. She lives in Sacramento with her husband. Twitter: @1KatieOrr

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor