San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee plans to send a delegation to Washington, D.C., to meet with federal housing officials who rejected a city measure that would give low-income and minority residents priority in new affordable housing developments in their neighborhoods.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s rejection of the city’s neighborhood preference plan was met with anger from San Francisco’s African-American leaders.

The decision led Sen. Dianne Feinstein to call on the department’s chief to work out a compromise with city officials.

“I ask that you personally oversee this partnership to ensure that San Francisco can pursue anti-displacement strategies,” Feinstein wrote to HUD Secretary Julian Castro.

HUD rejected the neighborhood preference program, saying it could violate the 1968 Fair Housing Act by limiting equal access to housing and perpetuating segregation.

The city’s program would have given black seniors in the city’s Western Addition preference to move into a 98-unit affordable housing development this fall.

The Board of Supervisors and Lee enacted the neighborhood preference plan in part to answer the continuing departure of the city’s African-American population.

The measure sets aside 40 percent of the new affordable housing units for qualified residents who already live in the supervisorial district where a new affordable development is being built.

San Francisco officials acknowledge that the city’s affordable housing lotteries are very competitive — they emphasize that the legislation improves the chances of residents moving into affordable housing in their own neighborhoods.

Lee wrote to Castro earlier this month, requesting the agency reconsider its decision.

“I believe that the decision is adverse to our mutual goals regarding equity, displacement prevention and the creation of opportunities for vulnerable populations,” Lee wrote.

Now the mayor is following up with a delegation to HUD.

“We are not going to give up as we experience the outmigration of African-Americans and others from San Francisco,” said mayoral spokeswoman Deirdre Hussey. “The mayor believes neighborhood preference is an anti-displacement policy.”

The city’s contingent will “take HUD up on their challenge to find anti-displacement policies that work for our city and our people.”

The city is working with Feinstein and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on the issue.

Feinstein sent a letter to Castro on Friday urging him to come to a solution with city officials by the end of President Obama’s term.

“I believe it is incumbent upon your department to work with cities, particularly those in California that have seen dramatically increasing housing costs in recent years, to develop innovative strategies to prevent residents from being priced out of their historic neighborhoods,” Feinstein wrote.

“San Francisco’s tech boom has led to increased demand for limited housing, particularly in the Western Addition,” the California senator wrote. “I am deeply concerned that, if left unchecked, this trend will destroy the fabric and culture of the individual neighborhoods that make San Francisco so unique. Please let me know if new legislation would be helpful to clarify the law on this issue.”

Pelosi’s office is also lobbying HUD.

“We support San Francisco’s neighborhood preference and have advocated strongly with HUD,” said Jorge Aguilar, a Pelosi spokesman. “We are disappointed by the department’s decision and hope they will reconsider.”

London Breed, president of the Board of Supervisors who co-authored the legislation, is calling on Pelosi and other Democrats to fight for the plan.

“We want action, we want housing,” Breed, who’s running for re-election, said during a news conference last Thursday. “We’re going to fight tooth and nail to make sure that we get it.”

Breed was joined by Supervisor Malia Cohen and the Rev. Amos Brown, president of the San Francisco NAACP.

“The soul of San Francisco’s neighborhoods are on the line,” Cohen, also a co-author, said at Thursday’s news conference.

“The only intention of the mayor and the board was to make sure we stop the hemorrhaging and the loss of African-Americans from this city,” Brown said in an earlier interview.

The Western Addition project, known as the Willie B. Kennedy development, is partially funded by HUD.

Adrian Williams would get preference to move into the building because she already lives in the neighborhood.

“I watch every day as I see seniors on the streets that have given back to this community, and now they’re homeless,” Williams said.

If the city moves forward on the preference plan, it risks losing HUD money, said Tim Iglesias, a law professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law, who specializes in housing issues.

“The city is caught between a rock and hard place,” Iglesias said. “This is a collision between fair housing law and our ongoing chronic affordable housing crisis.”

KQED’s Matt Beagle and Mina Kim contributed to this post.

  • freen the merciless

    departing african americans from san francisco? say it ain’t so. maybe the crime rate will nosedive too. btw, a liberal is just a conservative who hasn’t been mugged yet. and to Lady Feinstein: put the projects in your neighborhood. we got plenty.

  • nan

    I’ve been accused of being gentrified for the past 20+ years since moving to San Francisco. I don’t even know what it means in reality. Can we please stop categorizing each other based on the color of our skin.

  • lunartree

    This article is running into the same problem as the Chronicle’s original reporting. What laws are the program conflicting with? Are they mandating racial specifics or just proximity to new affordable housing? If you can’t answer this this isn’t reporting, and we can’t have any rational debate on the matter. PLEASE DO YOUR JOB JOURNALISTS!

    • Ellen A

      Initially I had the same issue, but found the reference….see paragraph 5. The 1968 Fair Housing Act.

  • allen

    The solution to the housing problems in the Bay Area can be found on my Facebook pages titled, Real Estate Crisis or Government Sanctioned Racketeering?
    There is an editorial page with my essays and a group page with news articles….

Author

Ted Goldberg

Ted Goldberg is the morning editor for KQED News. His beat areas include San Francisco politics, the city's fire department and the Bay Area's refineries.

Prior to joining KQED in 2014, Ted worked at CBS News and WCBS AM in New York and Bay City News and KCBS Radio in San Francisco. He graduated from Oberlin College in Ohio in 1998.

You can follow him at @TedrickG and reach him on email at tgoldberg@kqed.org

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor