Sanchez on Gun Issues
While Sanchez supports several gun control measures, such as a mandatory waiting period, a ban on high-capacity magazines and universal background checks, she did vote for the 2005 bill that granted gunmakers immunity from lawsuits based on the misuse of their products.
To many in the gun control community, this is a blemish on her record, and in April, Sanchez wrote an op-ed in the Sacramento Bee defending that vote. She noted that the full package included some gun control measures, but it was her concern for "unintended consequences" that played as large a role.
"I voted for it to prevent frivolous lawsuits against manufacturers," Sanchez said. "If someone uses a baseball bat or hammer to assault you, should the manufacturers be held criminally liable? If you said ‘no,’ then you agree with the principle behind the 2005 law."
The Brady Campaign wasn’t buying it. Four days after Sanchez’s op-ed, the organization issued a press release.
"Loretta Sanchez is dead wrong," said Dan Gross, president of the Brady Campaign. "I find it excruciatingly frustrating that she claimed to have 'fully analyzed unintended consequences' of the law and saw fit to support it nonetheless."
Gross said unlike an automaker who can be sued, the victims of gun violence have no legal recourse.
"The choice between a victim's right to justice and the possibility of inconveniencing the multibillion-dollar gun industry is not a 'tough decision', nor is it 'complicated,' " Gross said. "Loretta Sanchez is standing on the wrong side of this issue."
Ratings From the Brady Campaign, NRA
Sanchez is correct that she received a 100 percent rating from the Brady Campaign in its most recent rankings, which cover the 2013-14 Congress. This was called the "Lap Dog" scorecard.
But, according to votesmart.org, she has been nicked by the group in the past. Her "lifetime score" with the group, which covers only 1991-2009, was 81 percent.
On the flip side of the coin, the National Rifle Association has given Sanchez a grade of F in her past two terms, and before that, D's going back to 2002.
"She cannot defend her vote by parroting the gun lobby's misleading talking points and she cannot sweep this problem under the rug by laying claim to decade-old ratings," Gross said in his press release.
We did not hear back from Sanchez’s campaign.
Our Ruling
Sanchez said the Brady Campaign has given her a 100 percent rating. They have.
But she’s cherry-picking the evidence that puts her in the best light. In reality, the gun control group just recently wrote a scathing rebuke for Sanchez’s defense of her position on gunmaker liability.
And she hasn’t always received a 100 percent rating with the group.
Sanchez’s claim is partially accurate but leaves out important details. We rate it Half True.
HALF TRUE -- The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details or takes things out of context.
Click here for more on the six PolitiFact ratings and how we select facts to check.
For more fact-checks, go to PolitiFactCalifornia.com.
This story is part of California Counts, a collaboration of KPBS, KPCC, KQED and Capital Public Radio to report on the 2016 election. The coverage focuses on major issues and solicits diverse voices on what’s important to the future of California.
Read more in this series and let us know your thoughts on Twitter using the hashtag #CACounts.