upper waypoint

San Francisco Moves to Tighten Airbnb Law

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

San Francisco City Hall  (jivedanson/Flickr)

Update, April 30th: Share Better San Francisco filed a ballot measure on Wednesday to tighten restrictions on short-term rental platforms and hosts.

Next month , the San Francisco Board of Supervisors' Land Use and Transportation Committee is expected to take up the dueling proposals to amend the city's short-term rental law. Mayor Ed Lee and Supervisor Mark Farrell's short-term rental proposal, which would limit all rentals to 120 days per year, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission last week.

Original Post: Less than three months into implementation of an ordinance to legalize and regulate short-term rentals in San Francisco, city leaders and planners agree the law needs more work.

The ordinance, which took effect Feb. 1, established a framework to register hosts and enforce limits on guest stays booked on popular services like Airbnb.

But new data from San Francisco's Planning Department, the agency tasked with registering hosts and enforcing the law, shows that just 455 of the estimated 5,000 Airbnb hosts in the city have registered so far. As for enforcement, the department has yet to issue a single citation against law-breaking hosts.

Sponsored

Thursday, San Francisco's Planning Commission is set to consider changes to the law to address both the low registration rate and lack of enforcement. Two proposals -- one from Mayor Ed Lee and Supervisor Mark Farrell, and another from Supervisors David Campos, Eric Mar, and John Avalos -- include strict limits on rental lengths, whether or not a host is home during a guest's stay.

Hosts are currently allowed to rent out their entire home for 90 days a year. There is no limit on "hosted rentals," when a host stays in their home while a guest is visiting.

"That distinction is very difficult for our enforcement staff to determine," says Scott Sanchez, an administrator with the Planning Department, which supports a hard cap on rental lengths. "Going to a straight number of day limit and not requiring it to be hosted or unhosted just makes the enforcement a lot more straightforward and transparent."

Key Differences in Proposals

Lee's plan would limit a host's Airbnb-style rentals to 120 days a year; Campos' plan would impose a cap of 60 days. The proposals also differ on how to help the Planning Department enforce the law.

Under Lee's legislation, a new city office would process applications and crack down on hosts who illegally rent out units. Sanchez says his department supports the plan to bring together the expertise of the Department of Building Inspection and the Tax Collector's Office.

The ordinance from Supervisor Campos would instead empower neighbors and affordable housing nonprofits to bring legal action against hosts who violate the law, even if a violation has not been determined by the city.

"Enforcement is going to take a role by everyone, not just the city," Campos says. "That there are limits in terms of what the city can do and limitations in what the city can know."

To that end, Campos wants rental platforms like Airbnb to make sure all postings are registered with the city.

"My experience has been that Airbnb will do things not because we ask nicely but because we require them to do them," he says.

Ballot Measure Moving Ahead

If his proposal fails, Campos says he'll support a planned November ballot measure that could provide another chance to limit short-term rentals in the city.

The group ShareBetter San Francisco plans to file an initiative next week that would include many of the changes proposed by Supervisors Campos, Avalos and Mar.

A letter from ShareBetter cofounder Dale Carlson to the Planning Commission says Lee's proposal "incentivizes the continued conversion of residential units to de facto hotel rooms."

San Francisco-based Airbnb supported the city's initial ordinance, which housing activists and others characterized as a major victory for the company. But with increasing pressure coming from state lawmakers as well as in its own backyard, the company says it will fight new regulations.

"Instead of Trojan Horse proposals designed to effectively ban home sharing, lawmakers should focus on making it easier for San Franciscans to share their homes and follow the rules," Airbnb spokesperson Christopher Nulty said in a statement.

Thursday, the company launched a campaign aimed at dissuading city officials from adopting new proposals to regulate short-term rentals. The campaign, “The Home Sharing 11," will feature 11 Airbnb hosts -- one from each of the city's supervisorial districts.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
State Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some WorkersCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Erik Aadahl on the Power of Sound in FilmFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailKQED Youth Takeover: How Can San Jose Schools Create Safer Campuses?How to Attend a Rally Safely in the Bay Area: Your Rights, Protections and the PoliceWill Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?Nurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSilicon Valley House Seat Race Gets a RecountBill to Curb California Utilities’ Use of Customer Money Fails to Pass