In a case that could have a big impact on cities throughout California, a judge has ruled that San Jose cannot implement cuts to city employee pensions to save taxpayer funds. But the city can cut salaries to realize the savings expected from pension reductions.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Patricia Lucas released the ruling on Monday. It stems from a lawsuit over Measure B, which called for existing city employees, including police officers and firefighters, to pay 16 percent more into their pensions and retiree health care plans.
While the ruling is expected to be appealed, legal experts say it could set precedent for cities around the state that are considering pension cuts as a way to save taxpayer funds without having to cut services.
Measure B won nearly 70 percent voter approval in June 2012, but was challenged by employee unions. According to the San Jose Mercury News:
Municipal unions sued, saying the retirement benefits were previously approved at the bargaining table and represented a "vested right" that employees could not lose just because the city ran into hard financial times. A weeklong trial ensued in July. ...
[In her ruling last week, Lucas] said it forever became the city's responsibility to pay for employee pension costs once officials signed its labor contracts doling out the retirement benefits — and the rising costs of paying for those pensions was not a good enough excuse to wipe out that obligation.
But Lucas upheld a section of Measure B that allows city officials to cut workers' pay instead of pensions to achieve the taxpayer savings. Reed said city leaders will work out the pay cuts over the next months, before Measure B takes effect on July 1.