upper waypoint

San Jose Considers New Limits on Medical Pot Outlets

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Just as a new statewide survey finds widespread support for legalizing marijuana, San Jose officials are talking about taking steps that would likely shut down most of the city's 80 medical cannabis outlets.

As the San Jose Mercury News explains, the action is made possible by a state Supreme Court ruling on medical marijuana regulation earlier this year. The paper quotes Mayor Chuck Reed as a strong supporter of new limits:

"We can't just have a laissez-faire regulation system," said Reed, who suggested that the city get "mean" with problem pot shops.

Here's a summary from the East Bay Express of a staff proposal the City Council will consider later today:

    • Prohibit dispensaries within 1,000 feet of public and private schools, child daycare centers, churches with child daycare centers, community/recreation centers, parks, libraries and other Medical Marijuana establishments
    • Prohibit them within 500 feet from substance abuse rehabilitation centers;
    • Prohibit them within 150 feet from residential uses;

And then either:

  • Return within 90 days with a complete Medical Marijuana regulatory program; or
  • Return in 30 days with a ban prohibiting the operation of Medical Marijuana establishments in San Jose.

Mike Rosenberg of the San Jose Mercury News gives the background:

San Jose has not approved zoning for medical marijuana shops, making them technically illegal and subject to closure under city code enforcement. But there are no city laws specifically banning or regulating them. And San Jose voters in 2010 overwhelmingly approved a 10 percent tax on marijuana businesses, pumping $5.4 million a year into a $1 billion city general fund that has struggled with chronic shortfalls. City officials have limited enforcement action against marijuana stores to those that have generated complaints, are located near schools or failed to pay the city tax.

In pushing for the new law, city officials cite concerns from neighborhood and law enforcement groups, and a survey that found nearly half of Lincoln High School students got their marijuana from nearby collectives. ...

... The City Council — half of which is running for mayor in June — not only has to deal with the perennial hot-potato issue before them, but whether the law they pass would be upheld by voters.

Medical cannabis attorney James Anthony took one look at the proposed map the city published showing the few places where dispensaries could operate and said: "That's absurd; that's not going to work."

Rather than causing problems, Anthony said the pot shops have installed increased security systems, raised tax money, provided jobs and supplied local patients with convenient access to their "medicine." He predicted a repeat of the referendum drive he led when San Jose officials tried enacting similar regulations in September 2011.

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
California Preschools Wrestle to Comply With State’s Tightened Suspension RulesSan Francisco’s New Parking Rules Set to Displace RV Community Near SF StateA New Bay Area Clásico? SF's El Farolito and Oakland Roots Set to Battle in HaywardWhy Nearly 50 California Hospitals Were Forced to End Maternity Ward ServicesWhat the 99 Cents Only Stores Closure Means to CaliforniansDemocrats Again Vote Down California Ban on Unhoused EncampmentsCalifornia Legislators Take Aim at Construction Fees to Boost HousingBay Area Diaspora Closely Watching India’s Upcoming ElectionJail Deaths Prompt Calls To Separate Coroner And Sheriff's Departments In Riverside CountyFederal Bureau of Prisons Challenges Judge’s Order Delaying Inmate Transfers from FCI Dublin