upper waypoint

Will BART Workers Go On Strike Again Aug. 4?

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

City of Oakland workers and BART employees form in groups around Frank Ogawa Plaza during the strike earlier this month. Photo by Deborah Svoboda/KQED
City of Oakland workers and BART employees form in groups around Frank Ogawa Plaza during the strike earlier this month. Photo by Deborah Svoboda/KQED

A month after BART workers ended a four-day walkout, BART management and union representatives are back at the bargaining table, but so far there's little indication they're any closer to an agreement than they were at the beginning of July.

San Francisco Chronicle transportation reporter Michael Cabanatuan has been following the story and spoke with KQED's Stephanie Martin on Tuesday about the ongoing dispute and what we can expect. Edited transcript ...

Stephanie Martin: This is worrisome for many commuters because the deadline for a potential strike is Aug. 4. Should they start thinking about alternate transportation plans?

Michael Cabanatuan: I think it’s always wise to plan ahead especially when you’re a commuter who’s dependent on public transit, and there certainly is the possibility of a second BART strike. There really isn’t the capability of replacing BART service. It’s not like they have a secret fleet of mothballed buses and drivers who are on standby waiting in Alameda. They pretty much have buses they use for their daily service;  they can put out extra service but they can’t necessarily put out enough to handle 400,000 trips a day.

Martin: So a quick reminder of what this dispute is about: pay, health care, pensions and--BART workers also say--safety. How far apart are the two sides on these issues?

Sponsored

Cabanatuan: It’s really difficult to tell how far apart they are because when they return to the bargaining table they signed a 30-day contract extension and a mediation agreement, and both sides agreed they would not discuss the details of what’s being talked about in negotiations outside of the negotiating room. Martin: Just yesterday BART unveiled mockups of brand new rail cars, which the public can view all week at the MacArthur Station. Management says those cars won’t be possible if they capitulate to all the worker’s demands. It sounds like a big part of management strategy is public relations.

Cabanatuan: I think certainly some of it has to do with public relations; it is a public system after all. I think they want the riders to know that ‘this is where our money is going.’ It’s a publicity campaign on both sides, I think.

Martin: And what about the BART workers’ side?

Cabanatuan: The workers are saying, ‘look, we made sacrifices last time around.’ They’ve gone without raises for five years and they say that now that the system is back on its feet and doing better than ever in many terms, including ridership, they should share in the wealth and the success that they helped produce.

Martin: Now, many riders are going to be upset if BART workers go on strike again. What do the workers have to say to that? What do they stand to gain if they did that again?

Cabanatuan: I think what it is is leverage. They have the ability to shut down the transit system. That is a very powerful thing. They say they don’t want to do it. The thing to remember is they don’t get paid when they’re on strike, so I’m sure there are many of them who don’t want to do it. I think there are others who see the potential long-term benefit of it, but the longer a strike goes on, the harder it is on the people who are on strike, as well as the commuters.

Martin: Last time around public officials like Oakland Mayor Jean Quan and San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee stayed largely on the sidelines. Governor Brown didn’t play a very prominent role either. Any sense there’s political momentum building to end this?

Cabanatuan: I think there is political pressure out there. I think a lot of people are sort of taking a wait and see approach, hoping that the negotiations that are going on are successful. I think the governor has been more involved than people think. A lot of people think that he sort of punted and said, ‘You know, I’m not going to order a cooling off period.’ But the governor basically had the Labor Department get involved and that’s what spurred the contract expansion and the current negations. They brought in two new mediators and struck an agreement on how they were going to bargain, and the schedule for bargaining.

Martin: And what about that schedule? Is Aug. 4 still the critical date?

Cabanatuan: Since they haven’t been talking publicly about what’s going on at the table they could theoretically come out and announce that they’ve reached a tentative settlement any day, but the indication I’m getting is that they’re not there yet.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why Nearly 50 California Hospitals Were Forced to End Maternity Ward ServicesStunning Archival Photos of the 1906 Earthquake and FireDemocrats Again Vote Down California Ban on Unhoused EncampmentsFirst Trump Criminal Trial Underway in New YorkFederal Bureau of Prisons Challenges Judge’s Order Delaying Inmate Transfers from FCI DublinJail Deaths Prompt Calls To Separate Coroner And Sheriff's Departments In Riverside CountyRichmond Passes 45-Day Retail Moratorium on Tobacco to Deal With 'Excessive Smoke Shops'The Beauty in Finding ‘Other People’s Words’ in Your OwnAmid FAFSA Mistakes and Delays, Universities Struggle to Help StudentsSF’s Equity Program Fails to Address Racial Disparities in Cannabis Industry