KQED is a proud member of
Save ArticleSave Article
upper waypoint
News Fix

SF Weekly, Bay Guardian Now Under One Owner

Jon Brooks
Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Wow, the SF Weekly and Bay Guardian under one umrella? What's next, Ross Mirkarimi and Ed Lee hug?

Voice Media Group announced that it's sold the Weekly to the San Francisco Newspaper Company, which publishes both the Bay Guardian, San Francisco's other alternative weekly, and The Examiner.

From Voice Media Group:

The deal, effective immediately, means that The San Francisco Newspaper Company will assume operations for the paper beginning today. The sale of SF Weekly will allow Voice Media Group to focus on growth opportunities for mobile and online platforms and to develop core digital offerings in its other key markets...

Financial details of the deal will not be disclosed.

The SF Appeal is reporting the following:

According to at least one SF Weekly staffer, the San Francisco Weekly will experience multiple layoffs as a result of the publication's sale to the San Francisco Newspaper Company.

A deal involving the SF Newspaper Company and some other local asset had been rumored for a while. As the SF Appeal reported, initial speculation focused on the East Bay Express. Until the Express put an end to the rumor this way...

Sponsored

The SF Newspaper Company bought the Examiner from Clarity Media in 2011. Co-owner Todd Vogt took on the role of publisher and president.

The Guardian and Weekly have been at each other's throats for years. In 2008, the Guardian won an antitrust suit against its rival, with a jury issuing a verdict that the Weekly had engaged in illegal predatory pricing with intent to harm the Guardian. The Guardian was awarded $21 million in that case; the two sides settled in 2011. During that period the Weekly published lots of material critical of both the verdict and the Guardian. Stuff like this:

The Guardian responded in kind (or maybe they started it, it's hard to remember now...) Here's one 2010 post by the publication's Tim Redmond gloatingly titled "SF Weekly owes us half its ad revenue."

There have been editorial differences, as well.

Anyway, that's all over now. At least in terms of who signs the paychecks.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why California Environmentalists Are Divided Over Plan to Change Power Utility RatesWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealAllegations of Prosecutorial Bias Spark Review of Death Penalty Convictions in Alameda CountyCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Nurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSF Democratic Party’s Support of Unlimited Housing Could Pressure Mayoral Candidates‘Sweeps Kill’: Bay Area Homeless Advocates Weigh in on Pivotal US Supreme Court CaseBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to KnowCalifornia’s Future Educators Divided on How to Teach ReadingWhen Rivers Caught Fire: A Brief History of Earth Day