upper waypoint

Feud Over Jonestown Memorial

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Links:

By any measure, the Jonestown Massacre is one of the most tragic episodes in U.S. history. Thirty-two years after the murder of more than 900 people in Guyana—followers of the Rev. Jim Jones forced to drink poison—the nightmare refuses to fade away. The latest evidence: a media conference today at Oakland's Evergreen Cemetery, site of a mass grave that holds remains of several hundred victims. Family members have worked for decades to place a monument with the name of all those who died, but today they suggested the cemetery isn't cooperating with their plans to install it.

But as related by Angela Woodall of the Bay Area News Group, the Jonestown memorial saga has taken a bizarre turns. Jim Jones Jr., the son of the man who ordered the forced self-immolation in Guyana, is reportedly insisting that his father's name be included on the new monument. Woodall says that a company in Amador County is actually preparing such a memorial—and that it includes Jones's name.

The response at today's cemetery gathering in Oakland? "In plain English," one speaker said, "the children's names should be listed, not the tyrant's." And it's a little hard to avoid constructing analogies from this. For instance, who'd find it appropriate to list Stalin on a memorial to the victims of the gulag?

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
State Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some WorkersCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Erik Aadahl on the Power of Sound in FilmFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailKQED Youth Takeover: How Can San Jose Schools Create Safer Campuses?How to Attend a Rally Safely in the Bay Area: Your Rights, Protections and the PoliceWill Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?Silicon Valley House Seat Race Gets a RecountNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareBill to Curb California Utilities’ Use of Customer Money Fails to Pass