upper waypoint

Recidivism Rate for Freed Three-Strikers Continues to Be Very Low

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Prisoners at Chino State Prison, one of many California correctional institutions with a history of severe overcrowding. (Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)
Prisoners at Chino State Prison, one of many California correctional institutions with a history of severe overcrowding. (Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

The latest report on a California initiative to release inmates sentenced to life in prison for nonviolent crimes under the state’s three-strikes law shows a striking trend appears to be holding up: Far fewer of the former three-strikers are being sent to prison again for new crimes compared with other recently released inmates.

Stanford Law School’s Three Strikes Project says 1.3 percent of the 1,600 or so nonviolent three-strikers released since Proposition 36 passed in 2012 have gone back to state prison. That compares with a recidivism rate of 30 percent for all state prison inmates released during the same period. A report from the Stanford project last fall, which focused on the first 1,000 three-strikers freed under Prop. 36, found that 2 percent had reoffended and gone back to state prison.

“The Prop. 36 group of inmates being released really turns out to be the safest group of people to release in the entire prison system,” says Michael Romano, director of the Three Strikes Project.

More than 4,000 inmates in California were serving sentences disproportionate to their crimes under the old three-strikes law, Romano says, adding that many of them suffer from mental illness.

"People who have committed their crimes because they are very sick and had no other option, except to basically treat themselves with drugs and get into a spiral of criminal conduct," Romano says. "I think we have come to a point in the state's history where, instead of punishing these people, we learn that these people deserve our help and assistance."

Sponsored

Romano says he's concerned that re-entry programs are not adequate, especially for the mentally ill. Right now, many prisoners released under Proposition 36 are freed without anyone notifying families or attorneys. Many aren't even given adequate clothing.

Proposition 36 already has saved California more than $30 million in prison costs, Romano says. If it the trend continues, he says the initiative has the potential to save taxpayers more than $750 million over the next 10 years.

Here's Romano's interview with KQED's Mina Kim:

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Pro-Palestinian Protests Sweep Bay Area College Campuses Amid Surging National MovementAt Least 16 People Died in California After Medics Injected Sedatives During Police EncountersCalifornia Regulators Just Approved New Rule to Cap Health Care Costs. Here's How It WorksState Court Upholds Alameda County Tax Measure Yielding Hundreds of Millions for Child CareYouth Takeover: Parents (and Teachers) Just Don't UnderstandSan José Adding Hundreds of License Plate Readers Amid Privacy and Efficacy ConcernsCalifornia Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesViolence Escalates in Sudan as Civil War Enters Second YearSF Emergency Dispatchers Struggle to Respond Amid Outdated Systems, Severe UnderstaffingLess Than 1% of Santa Clara County Contracts Go to Black and Latino Businesses, Study Shows