KQED is a proud member of
Save ArticleSave Article
upper waypoint
The Bay

Prop. 31: Should California Ban Flavored Tobacco Products?

Ericka Cruz GuevarraLesley McClurgMaria EsquincaAlan Montecillo
Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

JERSEY CITY, NJ - JANUARY 02: E-cigarette pods units are displayed for customers in a local store on January 2, 2020 in Jersey City, New Jersey. The Trump administration will announce this week the ban for mint-, fruit- and dessert-flavored e-cigarette cartridges, but allow menthol and tobacco flavors to remain on the market. Flavored liquid nicotine used in open tank systems can continue to be sold. (Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images) (Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images)

In 2020, California lawmakers passed SB 793, which banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products that can be smoked, vaped, or eaten statewide.

But shortly after that, tobacco companies worked to put Prop. 31 on the ballot, taking the issue directly to the voters. It asks California voters whether to uphold that 2020 ban, or do away with it.

Guest: Lesley McClurg, KQED health correspondent


Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Bay Area High School Students Scramble to Find Seats to Take the SAT and ACTEvan Low Advances in Silicon Valley Congressional Race, After Recount Breaks Historic TieCalifornia Housing Is Even Less Affordable Than You Think, UC Berkeley Study SaysPhotos: Campus Protests Grow Across Bay AreaE. Coli Outbreak Linked to Organic Bulk Walnuts Sold in Some Bay Area StoresMay Day Rallies Focus on Palestinian Solidarity in San Francisco, OaklandTunnels Under San Francisco? Inside the Dark, Dangerous World of the SewersAlice Wong Redefines ‘Disability Intimacy’ in New AnthologyUC’s President had a Plan to De-Escalate Protests. How did a Night of Violence Happen at UCLA?Nursing Home Staff Shortages Leave Patients Waiting in Hospitals