Last week’s post about how the Internet affects plagiarism brought up some interesting points of discussion.

Readers are parsing the difference between copying information verbatim without citing the source, and paraphrasing information gleaned from sources like Wikipedia.

One reader writes:

As a graduate student and researcher, 80% of what I do is not expressing original thoughts, but accurately understanding, coherently organizing, and properly attributing other people’s thoughts. I realize TurnItIn focuses on essays and term papers, not research, but perhaps what we really need is better education on how to attribute and use sources.

Another reader takes a step back and frames the conversation in terms of information ownership:

We are entering an age where ownership of information is becoming increasingly shared or indeterminate. Therefore, it’s time to re-think the concept of plagiarism.

This young generation of thinkers sees intellectual property very differently than my older generation does. I believe we are not far from an era where most information is considered public property and one’s intellectual value is measured by what one can do with information rather than by how much one knows. In this new world, plagiarism will become irrelevant. Of course, those who reject my hypothesis can always use technological solutions to address this fundamentally technological problem. Personally, I’d rather cultivate a paradigm shift in my own thinking about what I truly value in student writing. Changing my old attitudes is preferable to wrestling with out-dated notions of plagiarism that are doomed to become irrelevant by the middle of the 21st century. Like it or not, this new generation is going to re-define much of what us old timers take for granted.

A reference librarian says she believes Wikipedia is a legitimate resource to begin research, and paraphrasing is not plagiarism.

I explain that it is perfectly okay to use Wikipedia to start your research, because it can guide you to more specific sources. It is also okay to copy ideas from other sources, as long as you understand those ideas and can put them in your own words. After all, it is not reasonable to ask a sixteen year old to come up with an original insight into Shakespeare, the Civil Rights movement or the use of antibiotics. But we can certainly do a better job in helping those students understand what might constitute legitimate information sharing from legitimate sources as opposed to short-cuts that amount to cheating.

Another reader believes that using another source’s idea without reference is also plagiarism, whether or not the same words are used.

The whole point of plagiarism (which many confuse with copyright which punishes copying exact words) is that you’re copying someone else’s *idea* without attribution, not just their exact words.

This brings me back to the idea, written by Esther Wojcicki, about the importance of students learning the skills of a journalist: Collect and confirm information.

  • Ali

    I agree that it is the responsibility of educators to educate students about to to appropriately use external resources…that includes paraphrasing, summarizing and quoting. Once students are aware of these strategies and know how to use them, they don’t have an excuse if they plagiarize. Whether it’s the year 2011 or 2050, we have the responsibility to foster academic and critical thinking skills. Allowing students to openly copy from others is the beginning of then end!

  • Robert Creutz

    iThenticate is iParadigm’s alternative to Turnitin. It is widely used by publishers, government organizations, corporations, and research facilities. In fact, their is growing use of an individual iThenticate option among researchers and doctoral students ( I do agree that in academics, students are trying to demonstrate understanding of subject matter, and can therefore rely more heavily on research resources. If you are intending to publish, however, you are contributing to a body of research. Your contribution should enhance that body of research rather than create redundancy.

  • The readers who believe plagiarism will be irrelevant in the future should consider whether the laws are going to reflect that change. An article in the T.H.E. Journal titled “The Accidental Plagiarists” states that many students do not understand what plagiarism is and is not. Unless they get training in this area, students could run into real problems. Even if some educators don’t agree with the way things are and expect them to change, they have an obligation to instruct students about current expectations and practices. Otherwise, those students’ ignorance will leave them vulnerable.

  • Elizabeth I.

    Students today are flooded with the temptation and opportunity to explore much more information than prior¬†generations have ever had in the privacy of their own homes. What to do? What a few episodes of their favorite series on Hulu or do some intensive research, takes notes, synthesize, summarize, analyze and create a stellar paper? The choices they make are up to them of course, but both educators and parents should instill a basic moral code which will guide the intrinsic internal motivation of the students. Are they proud of their work or just getting the paper done well enough to get the grade? Most students know when they are cheating and accept it as the norm, while¬†giving the students the tools to complete assignments without the need to succeed is everyone’s responsibility.

  • Paraphrasing is absolutely legal if it is properly done and contains all
    the original sources used in it. No one can claim it as an illegal work
    when sources are properly cited.

    ( )

    Paraphrasing Service

    • Completely Agree. A paraphrase is the expression of another’s ideas in one’s own words. You may paraphrase existing material as long as you provide a proper citation after the paraphrase. You should not put quotation marks around paraphrased material.

      ( Professional Sentence Rephraser)

      Thank you

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor