Of the estimated 24 million people under 30 who voted in the 2016 presidential election, a large majority supported Hillary Clinton. But Clinton received notably less support from young voters (18-29) than Barack Obama did in 2008 and 2012, particularly in the crucial battleground states she lost to Donald Trump.

That’s according to an analysis of 2016 exit poll data by the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), a nonpartisan research organization at Tufts University. (And yes, we acknowledge the irony of putting faith in any kind of polling data after the monumental failure of most pre-election polls in predicting the winner this year. More on that in a minute.)

About half the number of eligible voters between the ages of 18 and 29 (whom we’ll refer to as “millennials,” although millennials also include people in their early-to-mid-30s) cast ballots in this election. That rate falls well below the estimated general voter turnout rate of roughly 58 percent. About 55 percent of those millennial voters supported Clinton, as compared to the 60 percent who supported Obama in 2012, according to CIRCLE’s analysis. Conversely, youth support from Republicans remained relatively constant: Trump got about 37 percent of the youth vote, roughly equivalent to what Mitt Romney received in 2012.

It’s clear that Clinton did not maintain the same level of enthusiasm among young people that Obama did in 2008 and 2012. That gap in millennial support this year is evident in the increase in support for third-party candidates (from 3 percent nationally in 2012 to 8 percent this year) and potentially lower voter turnout, particularly in swing states. Although millennials nationwide still favored Democrats by 18 points, that margin of support was 5 percentage points lower than in 2012, and more than 20 points lower in some of the swing states that Obama won and Clinton lost.

screen-shot-2016-11-15-at-8-08-43-am

CIRCLE’s analysis of the national exit poll data also suggests that levels of racial and ethnic diversity among the youth electorate were consistent with the previous two presidential elections: overall, millennial voters are more diverse than the rest of the electorate.

This year, however, there appears to have been a higher percentage of youth with at least some college education. Additionally, in contrast to recent elections, young white men made up a larger proportion of the white youth electorate than young white women.

circle_edu

A brief note on exit polls:

Exit polls are surveys given to a sample of voters across the country after they leave their polling places. A sample of people who vote early and absentee/by mail (who now make up about 35-40 percent of the electorate) are surveyed by phone, and included in the general poll results.

The official national exit poll is conducted by Edison Research, a nonpartisan polling firm that has conducted exit polls for the National Election Pool (a consortium of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox and The Associated Press) since 2003. In addition to surveying about 16,000 early/absentee voters by phone, the firm said it interviewed roughly 85,000 voters on Election Day at nearly 1,000 polling places in 28 states. And like any poll, there is some margin of error (in other words, take it with a grain of salt). Click here to learn more about the process.

CIRCLE also included the following disclaimer about its analysis of exit polling data:

“No national official count of voters by age is immediately available after an election. Therefore, any statistic on youth voter turnout is an estimate based on survey data. Like any survey, the National Exit Poll uses methods that may introduce sampling bias. In past years, our estimates of youth turnout from the National Exit Poll (shown above) have produced a trend that very closely tracks the turnout trend in the Census Current Population Survey (CPS), which is the other major source for estimating youth turnout once it is released in the Spring. These estimates diverged slightly in 2012, although both showed a decrease.”

  • Jack Jackson

    Were the enough Was Obama/Was Not Hillary in the states of Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to flip the electoral college vote? She only 228,000 needed that’s something like only 1 more in 80 or 100 votes cast. Donald’s win was by a razor…And the FBI interference was the kicker.

    • Susan Page

      the FBI didn’t install her illegal email server

      • Jack Jackson

        The private email server WAS NOT illegal. Just ill-advised and badly managed. https://www.wbez.org/shows/this-american-life/master-of-her-domain-name/1d9de199-8f95-4074-883a-5f03bc9354a6

        Where were the funds to update State Dept IT to accept HRC’s Blackberry? Stuck in Congress with the security dollars that actually caused Benghazi.

        • Susan Page

          I have a top secret clearance and worked at the Department of State for 22 years. Trust me — the server was illegal and how she skated through the FBI investigation can only be explained by Obama’s edict BEFORE the investigation to lay off, as evidenced by his comments in a TV interview in January. HRC was the owner of her fate — don’t blame the FBI except for caving in the first placee.

          • Jack Jackson

            Not to doubt your experience but the State Dept’s IT seems to be always out of date. If Hillary’s server was not just ill-advised but illegal why were neither Powell or Rice gigged for their use of external ISP? Where was the money to upgrade the StateDept’s IT to handle a Blackberry?
            The FBI placed it’s over-sized thumb on the scale and there ought to be a reckoning. Imagine the outrage if an aggressive US Atty in NY or FL had convened a grand jury on Trump’s sexual assault allegations and announced it on 10/28. The uproar would have been continual and justified because a free and fair election cannot be held under such circumstances.

            The FBI’s dirty trick amounts to a coup. You don’t see it because you don’t want to.

          • Susan Page

            I don’t see it because you don’t know what you’re talking äbout. My TS clearance is current, BTW.

          • naturallycurly

            I’m thinking anyone with a real security clearance would not be parading it about on social media with sly insinuations about classified matters.

Author

Matthew Green

Matthew Green produces and edits The Lowdown, KQED’s multimedia news education blog, an online resource for educators and the general public. He previously taught journalism at Fremont High School in East Oakland, and has written for numerous local publications, including the Oakland Tribune and San Francisco Chronicle. Email: mgreen@kqed.org; Twitter: @KQEDlowdown

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor