KQED Radio
KQED Newssee more
Latest Newscasts:KQEDNPR
Player Sponsored By
upper waypoint

Study Questions Aggressive Cancer Treatments for Terminal Patients

at
Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

 (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

A new study suggests that chemotherapy given to terminal cancer patients who aren’t expected to live beyond six months may do more harm than good. We’ll discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy for terminal patients, especially when weighed against the effects on quality of life. We’ll also look at the high rate of intensive treatments used in the final months for teens dying of cancer.

Guests:

Holly Prigerson, director, Weill Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care; co-author of "Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status and Quality of Life at the End of Life"

Steven Pantilat, professor of Clinical Medicine and Director of the Palliative Care Program Organization, UCSF

Lowell Schnipper, professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School; chairman of the task force on value in cancer care for the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Have We Entered Into a New Cold War Era?KQED Youth Takeover: How Social Media is Changing Political AdvertisingDeath Doula Alua Arthur on How and Why to Prepare for the EndHow to Create Your Own ‘Garden Wonderland’First Trump Criminal Trial Underway in New YorkThe Beauty in Finding ‘Other People’s Words’ in Your OwnWhat the 99 Cents Only Stores Closure Means to CaliforniansBay Area Diaspora Closely Watching India’s Upcoming Electionare u addicted to ur phoneJosé Vadi’s “Chipped” Looks at Life from a Skateboarder’s Lens