When the robots come to take our jobs, what are we all going to do to keep a roof over our heads and food on the table? That’s the question that the universal basic income (UBI) hopes to answer. The government gives everyone JUST enough money to afford the basics so that no one falls into total, abject poverty. Supporters think a universal income is essential to fight financial inequality and help the millions of people who could lose their jobs to artificial intelligence. But opponents think it would be WAY too expensive and could hurt the economy by stripping away the incentive to work. Where do you stand? Is the universal basic income a good idea or bad idea?

Want to your students to discuss this Above the Noise episode with peers from around the country? Sign up for KQED Learn (https://learn.kqed.org/) and join the conversation (https://learn.kqed.org/topics)!

How much money would the universal basic income give you?

It depends. In the U.S., most experts think that $1,000 a month would be the ideal target amount. It’s just enough (maybe) to prevent total financial devastation, but not enough that it would dissuade people from keeping their job or looking for a job if they don’t have one.

Who would get the universal basic income?

A true universal basic income would be universal, meaning everyone would get it. Even the wealthy like Bill Gates, although he would owe WAY more in taxes than than he’d get from the government.

What are the main arguments FOR a universal basic income?

Some liberals think that a universal basic income is an effective method to fight financial inequality, which is big and growing. The wealthiest 1% own half of all the world’s wealth, and by 2030, it’s estimated to increase to two-thirds! Some conservatives think a universal basic income could shrink current welfare programs, and would put more choice in the hands of the individual.

What are the main arguments AGAINST a universal basic income?

Some conservatives think that giving everyone a universal basic income would be so massively expensive that it would be totally impractical to implement, and would almost certainly require people to pay more in taxes. Liberals worry that in order to afford the universal basic income, government welfare programs like food stamps and housing assistance would need to be significantly cut or eliminated.


Want to your students to discuss this Above the Noise episode with peers from around the country? Sign up for KQED Learn (https://learn.kqed.org/) and join the conversation (https://learn.kqed.org/topics)!


Stanford scholar explores pros, cons of ‘basic income’


Richest 1% on target to own two-thirds of all wealth by 2030

What does the federal government spend your tax dollars on?

Stockton Preparing Rollout Of Universal Basic Income Plan

Finland to end basic income trial after two years

This Kenyan village is a laboratory for the biggest basic income experiment ever

Should We Get Free Money From The Government? 8 February,2019Derek Lartaud


Derek Lartaud

Derek Lartaud came to the Bay Area after nearly five years of researching schizophrenia and diabetes at Yale University. Determined to tell visual stories, he’s worked for the BBC, Al Jazeera America, TIME, PBS, and the Center for Investigative Reporting. He has a bachelor’s degree in neuroscience and a master’s degree in journalism. When not holding a camera or editing a story, he’s trying to rebuild his 1969 Honda CL350.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor