You know you’ve struck a nerve when you draw protesters on both sides of an international border.

That was the case last Tuesday (March 12), when President Trump inspected a collection of border wall prototypes on display in a dusty lot near the U.S.-Mexico border outside of San Diego.

The visit marked his first trip to left-leaning California since taking office, and he used the occasion to resume the push for his ­long-promised and highly controversial “big, beautiful” border wall. He also, in no uncertain terms, condemned California and specific jurisdictions within the state that offer “sanctuary” to undocumented immigrants by not fully cooperating with federal immigration officials.  Oh, and he also accused Gov. Jerry Brown  (D) of doing “a terrible job.”

“They have the highest taxes in the United States,” Trump said. “The place is totally out of control.”

On Twitter, Brown thanked Trump for the “shout-out” adding:

“But bridges are still better than walls. And California remains the 6th largest economy in the world and the most prosperous state in America #Facts.”

Stretching nearly 2,000 miles from the Pacific Coast to the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S.-Mexico border is the  most crossed international boundary in the world. Everyday, more than a billion dollars worth of goods pass back and forth across the border, as do about 11 million people.

The eight border wall prototypes, some 30-feet high, are built out of various configurations of concrete and steel. Some even come with spikes on top. The controversial samples will be tested on several criteria to determine which one’s will potentially be used along major stretches of the border with Mexico. That is, if Trump gets his way.

Despite famously promising throughout his campaign that Mexico would pay for a new border wall, the Trump administration is now seeking $18 billion from Congress to cover the costs of construction for the next 10 years. That would fund about 300 miles of new  barriers where nothing currently exists, and replace roughly 400 miles of “legacy” fencing .

It’s a tall order given the proposal’s widespread opposition among  Democratic lawmakers and the American public,  not to mention, at best lukewarm support from Republicans. And if it does get the green light, the project would also almost certainly get held up in a slew of lawsuits, challenging construction on both environmental and jurisdictional  grounds.

But even beyond all of those hurdles, building an effective wall along the border is not nearly as physically straightforward or feasible as Trump would make it seem.

To get a better sense of the lay of the land, literallym Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, spent years collecting and mapping border data, including the 700-mile hodgepodge of fencing that currently exists, and that is often not even on the actual border.  Explore the map below to see what the border actually looks like. You can also see a full-screen version here and listen to a fascinating set of border-related stories produced last year by Reveal reporters.

MAP: What Does the U.S.-Mexico Border Actually Look Like? 16 March,2018Matthew Green

Author

Matthew Green

Matthew Green is a digital media producer for KQED News. He previously produced The Lowdown, KQED’s multimedia news education blog. Matthew's written for numerous Bay Area publications, including the Oakland Tribune and San Francisco Chronicle. He also taught journalism classes at Fremont High School in East Oakland.

Email: mgreen@kqed.org; Twitter: @MGreenKQED

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor