Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick made headlines this weekend for not standing during the national anthem at Friday’s pre-season game. When asked about his decision he said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.”

Kaepernick is not the only athlete to call attention to social issues in 2016.

  • In July, players from three WNBA teams defied the league’s dress code by wearing black warm up shirts to call attention to police involved shootings in their states. The league initially fined the players and their teams for violating the dress code, but eventually dismissed the charges.
  • At the Olympic games in Rio de Janeiro, Ethiopian runner Feyisa Lilesa crossed his arms at the marathon finish line in protest of the persecution faced by the Omoro people of his home country.

[UPDATE]

Since Kaepernick’s protest, other athletes have been inspired by his actions, and have joined in solidarity.

On the flip side, some feel that politics and sports should stay separate. Others felt disrespected by Kaepernick’s decision not to stand.

What do you think? Should athletes use their platform to bring awareness to social issues, or should they focus on playing their sport?

Respond in the comments below or on Twitter using the hashtag #DoNowKaepernick. Follow the trending Twitter hashtag  to see what others have to say.


Also, this…

Political Tension at the Olympics: A History [The Lowdown, KQED]

When Athletes Take Political Stands [The Atlantic]

What Colin Kaepernick’s National Anthem Protest Tells Us About America [Rolling Stone]

Should Athletes Use Their Public Platform to Make Political Statements? 1 September,2017Chanelle Ignant

Author

Chanelle Ignant

Chanelle is the Youth Media Specialist for KQED Learning. She has worked with various Bay Area youth media organizations and is an independent media maker.