{"id":5977,"date":"2010-05-17T16:27:55","date_gmt":"2010-05-17T23:27:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=5977"},"modified":"2023-05-25T00:06:26","modified_gmt":"2023-05-25T00:06:26","slug":"whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/","title":{"rendered":"What’s Soot Got to Do With It?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Andrew Freedman, Climate Central<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Most of the discussion regarding the highly anticipated Senate energy and climate change legislation<\/a>, which Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) introduced last week following months of negotiations, has focused on the bill\u2019s provisions pertaining to offshore oil and gas drilling<\/a>, incentives for renewable energy<\/a>, and cap on carbon emissions for certain economic sectors<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Although the bill\u2019s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction targets–an 80 percent emissions cut by 2050 compared to 2005 levels–would yield significant long-term climate benefits, the bill also addresses man-made climate change in the shorter term.<\/p>\n

\"Stack
Stack emissions from a bulk freighter in San Francisco Bay. Photo: Craig Miller<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

A little-noticed portion of the bill concerns short-lived air pollutants such as black carbon (otherwise known as soot) and tropospheric ozone. These pollutants disrupt the climate on far shorter timescales than CO2, which scientists consider the most important greenhouse gas and the main villain in the climate change story.<\/p>\n

Once emitted by the burning of fossil fuels, the use of solid-fuel cooking stoves or biomass burning, among other sources, black carbon only stays aloft for days to a few weeks before being washed out of the atmosphere by precipitation. This means that once black carbon emissions are reduced, there would be almost immediate climate benefits.<\/p>\n

The Kerry-Lieberman bill would direct the US EPA to use its existing authority under the Clean Air Act to reduce black carbon emissions from diesel engines, using devices called diesel particulate filters which trap soot emissions before they escape from a vehicle\u2019s tailpipe.<\/p>\n

It would also call upon the EPA to publish a report on black carbon \u201csources, impacts, and reduction opportunities,\u201d including an examination of how foreign assistance programs could help reduce emissions in other nations. In addition, the bill would establish an inter-agency process to facilitate \u201cfast mitigation strategies\u201d that focus on non-CO2 warming agents. This process would involve agencies such as the EPA and the Energy Department (DOE).<\/p>\n

How big a climate player is black carbon?<\/h2>\n

Black carbon is thought to be a powerful warming agent in many regions, particularly snow and ice-covered areas such as the Himalayas and the Arctic. As its name suggests, black carbon particles are dark in color, and are therefore strong absorbers of incoming solar radiation<\/a>. They warm the atmosphere and alter cloud characteristics, and when they land on brightly colored snow and ice, they darken the surface, causing a large uptick in the absorption of solar radiation, which hastens melting.<\/p>\n

In the Arctic, black carbon contributes to a feedback loop that has helped cause a rapid melting of sea ice cover and drive temperatures upward at nearly twice the rate of the rest of the world. The decade from 1999-2008 was the warmest ten-year period in the Arctic of the past 2,000 years, according to a study<\/a> published in the journal Science<\/em> in 2009.<\/p>\n

In addition to Arctic warming, black carbon has been shown to alter regional climate patterns such as the Indian monsoon, and human inhalation of soot particles is known to be a major health hazard worldwide.<\/p>\n

In recent years numerous scientists, most prominently V. (Ram) Ramanathan of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and James Hansen of NASA have called for significant cuts in short-lived air pollutants as a way to reduce climate change in the near term, while efforts continue to address CO2 emissions in the long run. Ramanathan\u2019s studies<\/a> have shown that black carbon may be the second largest contributor to global climate change.<\/p>\n

In March testimony before the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming<\/a>, Ramanathan stated that the current global warming effect of black carbon \u201cmay be as much as 60 percent\u201d of the CO2 warming effect. He noted, however, that there are significant uncertainties about black carbon\u2019s role in the climate system.<\/p>\n

Ramanathan told House lawmakers that reducing black carbon emissions \u201cmay provide a possible mechanism for buying time to develop and implement effective steps for reducing CO2 emissions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bill is aligned with recent scientific advice<\/h2>\n

The Kerry-Lieberman bill\u2019s inclusion of rapid mitigation strategies is consistent with advice contained in a new paper<\/a> from an interdisciplinary panel of scholars, published on May 11 by the University of Oxford in the UK. The paper argues that non-CO2 drivers of climate change have been overlooked \u201cfor reasons of convenience in framing policy\u201d rather than due to scientific concerns, and it presents a vision for an overhaul of climate policy that would include a much more prominent role for addressing emissions of short-lived air pollutants.<\/p>\n

\u201cSince action on these non-CO2 \u2018forcers\u2019 may have quicker impact and large, immediate primary benefits, we would give them priority, now. In contrast to long and arduous tasks, these can be \u2018quick hits\u2019,\u201d the report states.<\/p>\n

The bill\u2019s provisions are also consistent with the findings of a scientific panel that examined options to address rapid Arctic climate change. In a 2008 report<\/a>, the panel strongly endorsed pursuing emissions reductions of black carbon and other short-lived air pollutants. \u201c\u2026Curbing short-lived climate forcing agents, through rapid international action and Arctic nation leadership, may prove to be the best and perhaps only viable strategy for slowing Arctic warming in the time frame of years to a decade,\u201d the report stated.<\/p>\n

Considering that the Kerry-Lieberman bill itself faces a highly uncertain future, with significant resistance in both political parties, it may yet take even longer to address what many experts consider to be a ripe, low hanging fruit of the climate challenge. This does not bode well, given the much more difficult work that lies ahead to reduce CO2 and other longer-lasting greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n

In April, Molly Samuel reported on<\/a> the effects of black carbon and snow albedo on the California’s water forecasting efforts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Scientists and lawmakers are putting the spotlight on emissions other than CO2, hoping for faster progress against global warming.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11413,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[19,54,113,114,193,435],"coauthors":[698],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-5977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government-business","tag-air","tag-black-carbon","tag-climate-bill","tag-climate-central","tag-emissions","tag-policy"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"\nWhat's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scientists and lawmakers are putting the spotlight on emissions other than CO2, hoping for faster progress against global warming.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-17T23:27:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-25T00:06:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/05\/Ship_0896.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gretchen Weber\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gretchen Weber\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/\",\"name\":\"What's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-17T23:27:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-25T00:06:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What’s Soot Got to Do With It?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5\",\"name\":\"Gretchen Weber\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/e524b6febe575d1cb1233bc6fc23c0de\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gretchen Weber\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/gweber\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch","og_description":"Scientists and lawmakers are putting the spotlight on emissions other than CO2, hoping for faster progress against global warming.","og_url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2010-05-17T23:27:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-25T00:06:26+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/05\/Ship_0896.jpg"}],"author":"Gretchen Weber","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gretchen Weber","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/","url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/","name":"What's Soot Got to Do With It? | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-17T23:27:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-25T00:06:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/05\/17\/whats-soot-got-to-do-with-it\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What’s Soot Got to Do With It?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5","name":"Gretchen Weber","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/e524b6febe575d1cb1233bc6fc23c0de","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gretchen Weber"},"url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/gweber\/"}]}},"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11413"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5977"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24938,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977\/revisions\/24938"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=5977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}