{"id":4092,"date":"2010-02-10T12:19:38","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T20:19:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=4092"},"modified":"2010-02-10T12:19:38","modified_gmt":"2010-02-10T20:19:38","slug":"uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/","title":{"rendered":"UC Scientist: Don&#8217;t Blame the Cows"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Cody Sheehy is a rangeland ecologist and <a title=\"Autonomy Productions\" href=\"http:\/\/www.autonomyproductions.com\/\">independent documentary producer<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-4592\" title=\"87736822\" src=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/cowface_blog.jpg\" alt=\"87736822\" width=\"160\" height=\"239\" \/>By Cody Sheehy<\/p>\n<p>A couple of months ago, nearly lost amid the &#8220;Hopenhagen&#8221; hype,\u00a0 the University of California, Davis (UCD) put out a <a title=\"UCD - news release\" href=\"http:\/\/www.news.ucdavis.edu\/search\/news_detail.lasso?id=9336\">press release<\/a> with an admonition: &#8220;Don&#8217;t Blame Cows for Climate Change.&#8221; The release was a first look\u00a0at some work conducted by UCD Associate Professor and Air Quality Specialist Frank Mitloehner. His study examines the greenhouse gases, or GHGs, emitted by the livestock sector.\u00a0 As California&#8217;s air regulators turn more attention toward methane in particular, the report remains timely.<\/p>\n<p>Mitloehner&#8217;s paper is entitled: &#8220;Clearing the Air: Livestock\u2019s Contributions to Climate Change,&#8221; and was published in the peer-reviewed journal <a title=\"Advances in Agronomy - Vol. 103\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science?_ob=PublicationURL&amp;_tockey=%23TOC%2318034%232009%23998969999%231482094%23FLA%23&amp;_cdi=18034&amp;_pubType=BS&amp;_auth=y&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=d735d5bc28fa995c6ef87d49c96c70cc\"><em>Advances in Agronomy<\/em><\/a>. The paper is a synthesis of current science on the cattle-climate connection. Mitloehner has been updating some of that science in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>In 2008, I stopped by his cluster of &#8220;bio bubbles;&#8221; airtight domes that serve as high-tech stables for cows. Inside, Mitloehner had set up simulated dairy operations, measuring GHGs emitted by the cows&#8217; digestive process and decomposition of the manure. The numbers then in common use had been generated in the 1930s.<\/p>\n<figure  id=\"attachment_4593\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 284px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-4593\" title=\"BioBubblesUCD_blog\" src=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/BioBubblesUCD_blog.jpg\" alt=\"Research &quot;bio-bubbles&quot; at UC Davis. Photo: Cody Sheehy\" width=\"284\" height=\"160\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/BioBubblesUCD_blog.jpg 284w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/BioBubblesUCD_blog-160x90.jpg 160w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/BioBubblesUCD_blog-240x135.jpg 240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 284px) 100vw, 284px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Research &quot;bio-bubbles&quot; at UC Davis. Photo: Cody Sheehy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mitloehner says cattle gets a bum rap in the media, and points to some examples, including a 2007 story in <em>Time<\/em> magazine, which included assertions like: &#8220;Which is responsible for more global warming: your BMW or your Big Mac? Believe it or not, it&#8217;s your Big Mac,&#8221; and &#8220;A 16-oz T-bone is like a hummer on a plate . . &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In many cases, Mitloehner says the statements are crafted from an influnencial <a title=\"UN report\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fao.org\/docrep\/010\/a0701e\/a0701e00.HTM\">2006 United Nations report<\/a> entitled: &#8220;Livestock&#8217;s Long Shadow.&#8221;\u00a0 According to the executive summary, &#8220;The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But Mitloehner points to a quote deeper in the report:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The respiration of livestock makes up only a very small part of the net release of carbon that can be attributed to the livestock sector. Much more is released indirectly by other channels, including: the burning of fossil fuel to produce mineral fertilizers used in feed production, methane release from the breakdown of fertilizers and from animal manure, land-use changes for feed production and for grazing, land degradation, fossil fuel use during feed and animal production and fossil fuel use in production and transport of processed and refrigerated animal products.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Mitloehner cautions that the transportation number they use only accounts for tailpipe emissions. To be even-handed, he says, the authors should&#8217;ve incorporated emissions from the entire oil industry, including refinement of the oil and production of cars. In the UCD release, Mitloehner calls it a &#8220;lopsided &#8216;analysis&#8221; and &#8220;a classical apples-and-oranges analogy that truly confused the issue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Bio-bubbles have been generating some interesting numbers. Mitloehner found that the amount of methane the cows respire (belch) and how much is released in the breakdown of animal manure is quite different from what previous research had calculated. In combination, these two sources represent the most direct GHGs from the livestock industry, even if they&#8217;re not the largest GHG emitter\u00a0associated with the industry. They&#8217;re also the most out of date.<\/p>\n<p>Emission factors used in &#8220;Livestock&#8217;s Long Shadow&#8221; provide an estimate of methane respiration\u00a0of about 86 million tonnes (metric tons) of methane (CH4) and\u00a017.5 million tonnes of CH4 annually from manure decomposition. In the annex of the UN report, the authors write: &#8220;Obviously, great improvements to the estimates of emission factors could be made if more data on nutrition and production were available.&#8221; And so it is that inside his bio-bubbles, Mitloehner has come up with numbers much lower than those that represented the conventional wisdom since 1938.<\/p>\n<p>All in all, we&#8217;ve got a\u00a0discussion about comparing apples and oranges (more appealing than manure, granted) and some updated numbers that lower the emissions of livestock in one category. As with any scientific paper, there will probably be debate on both of these points and new ones, but let&#8217;s look at the broader consequences. Will industry\u00a0look at this study and see an incentive to update and revise carbon emission numbers all across the board?<\/p>\n<p>According to Emilo Laca, an agricultural ecologist at U. C. Davis, some of these questions will be fodder for policy debates that lie outside the realm of science. He says &#8220;The real question is, &#8216;How are we going to split this up?'&#8221; Laca used a hypothetical problem to explain: Let&#8217;s say that a certain livestock industry consumed 30% of soybean production as a food source. Livestock producers might concede that they should be accountable for 30% of carbon emissions related to soybeans. It makes sense. It&#8217;s what the numbers say. Others might counter that without this certain livestock industry, the soybean market would behave differently and some amount&#8211;lets guess 70%&#8211;wouldn&#8217;t need to be planted. Therefore, the livestock industry in this example\u00a0is responsible for 70% of the emissions, not 30%.\u00a0Science can support both interpretations. As Laca says, the decision is how to &#8220;split&#8221; things up. And ultimately, those decisions may fall to policy wonks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can going vegan help slow down climate change? Some say it can but a recent study out of UC Davis cast some doubt on the notion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":221,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[17,19,179,193,263,337,357],"coauthors":[],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-4092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-thescience","tag-agriculture","tag-air","tag-economics","tag-emissions","tag-greenhouse-gas","tag-livestock","tag-methane"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.13 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>UC Scientist: Don&#039;t Blame the Cows | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UC Scientist: Don&#039;t Blame the Cows | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can going vegan help slow down climate change? Some say it can but a recent study out of UC Davis cast some doubt on the notion.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/cowface_blog.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Craig Miller\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@voxterra\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Craig Miller\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/\",\"name\":\"UC Scientist: Don't Blame the Cows | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f7222c517400a6c4b0336fca3652c323\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"UC Scientist: Don&#8217;t Blame the Cows\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f7222c517400a6c4b0336fca3652c323\",\"name\":\"Craig Miller\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/dd8f4f4f978df3faac9db4c510939ea0\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b91661df645e001a9cafe0861fa685f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b91661df645e001a9cafe0861fa685f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Craig Miller\"},\"description\":\"Craig is a former KQED Science editor, specializing in weather, climate, water &amp; energy issues, with a little seismology thrown in just to shake things up. Prior to that, he launched and led the station's award-winning multimedia project, Climate Watch. Craig is also an accomplished writer\/producer of television documentaries, with a focus on natural resource issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/voxterra\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/cmiller\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UC Scientist: Don't Blame the Cows | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"UC Scientist: Don't Blame the Cows | Climate Watch","og_description":"Can going vegan help slow down climate change? Some say it can but a recent study out of UC Davis cast some doubt on the notion.","og_url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2010\/02\/cowface_blog.jpg"}],"author":"Craig Miller","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@voxterra","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Craig Miller","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/","url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/","name":"UC Scientist: Don't Blame the Cows | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00","dateModified":"2010-02-10T20:19:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f7222c517400a6c4b0336fca3652c323"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2010\/02\/10\/uc-scientist-dont-blame-the-cows\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UC Scientist: Don&#8217;t Blame the Cows"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f7222c517400a6c4b0336fca3652c323","name":"Craig Miller","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/dd8f4f4f978df3faac9db4c510939ea0","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b91661df645e001a9cafe0861fa685f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b91661df645e001a9cafe0861fa685f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Craig Miller"},"description":"Craig is a former KQED Science editor, specializing in weather, climate, water &amp; energy issues, with a little seismology thrown in just to shake things up. Prior to that, he launched and led the station's award-winning multimedia project, Climate Watch. Craig is also an accomplished writer\/producer of television documentaries, with a focus on natural resource issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/voxterra"],"url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/cmiller\/"}]}},"template_type":null,"featured_image_type":null,"is_audio_post":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/221"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4092\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=4092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}