{"id":3187,"date":"2009-10-16T15:55:17","date_gmt":"2009-10-16T23:55:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=3187"},"modified":"2018-02-02T19:36:40","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T19:36:40","slug":"an-hour-with-stewart-brand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/","title":{"rendered":"An Hour with Stewart Brand"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure  id=\"attachment_3201\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 631px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3201 size-full\" title=\"sbjpg-filtered\" src=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"631\" height=\"692\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered.jpg 631w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered-160x175.jpg 160w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered-240x263.jpg 240w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered-375x411.jpg 375w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered-520x570.jpg 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 631px) 100vw, 631px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo by Ryan Phelan<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Climate Watch sat down with ecologist and futurist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/04\/19\/magazine\/19wwln-domains-t.html\">Stewart Brand<\/a> to talk about the rethinking of &#8220;traditional green pieties&#8221; that he says environmentalists will have to confront, in order to address climate change. In his new book, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Whole-Earth-Discipline-Ecopragmatist-Manifesto\/dp\/0670021210\">Whole Earth Discipline<\/a><\/em>, he argues for a major change in the way &#8220;greens&#8221; have traditionally thought about stewarding the planet &#8212; one that calls for managing the earth&#8217;s natural infrastructure &#8220;with as light a touch as possible and with as much intervention as necessary.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What do you think the world is facing in terms of climate change?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I pretty much buy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jameslovelock.org\/\">James Lovelock<\/a>&#8216;s approach that we&#8217;re warming toward an equilibrium of maybe five degrees warmer than now, which doesn&#8217;t sound like much, but the last time we were that was 55 million years ago and crocodiles were swimming around in the polar oceans. [Lovelock] thinks the carrying capacity for humans in a world that&#8217;s five degrees warmer would be about a billion to a billion-and-a-half people. And it could happen fairly quickly because there are various positive feedbacks that are self-reinforcing, amplification of change going on. A four-or-five-billion person die-back is horrible to contemplate. Nothing like it has ever happened in human history, and it does get your attention.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I am persuaded by a number of data points he looks at and climatologists he listens to and the system dynamics of climate, which is tremendously non-linear. It has lots of these positive feedbacks in it and various thresholds. Sometimes we know where the threshold is, and sometimes we find out after we&#8217;ve passed it. Abrupt climate change, it turns out, is pretty common in the historical record and that&#8217;s what we could be looking at this century, maybe even in the first half of this century.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You write in your book: &#8220;Accustomed to saving natural systems from civilization, Greens now have the unfamiliar task of saving civilization from a natural system: climate change.&#8221; Can you talk more about this?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I wonder if there will be people turning up soon saying, &#8220;Let the climate do what it wants. Gaia&#8217;s just having her usual carryings-on and we must not stand in her way.&#8221; <em>[Ed. Note: There are people already saying this]<\/em> I think when it cuts this close to home, environmentalists do realize that when humans are an endangered species we&#8217;ve got to rise to the occasion and be green to protect this species and its habitat as well.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a shift that goes on because the standard, deep, ideological, emotional stance of environmentalists is that nature is always right and humans are always wrong, and this is a case when actually, nature is up to something we really, really don&#8217;t like and we have to do, as humans, something that&#8217;s right to head that off. That&#8217;s a switch. And it&#8217;s my point of leverage in the book which is to say, okay, bear that switch in mind, now think through all the things you&#8217;ve had opinions about for 20 or 30 years and revisit them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The climate crunch gives us permission, indeed encouragement, to rethink nuclear power, to rethink genetically-engineered food crops, to rethink how we feel about cities, and to start thinking in a serious way and an encouraging way about geo-engineering, which is direct intervention in the climate.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The idea of &#8220;playing God&#8221; with nature can raise a lot of emotion and controversy&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The thing is, we&#8217;ve been having god-like power in nature for a very long time, probably at least 10,000 years, maybe 55,000 years when we started doing massive burning to change the landscape in a way that we liked. In ecology, the current term is &#8220;niche construction&#8221; or &#8220;ecological engineering.&#8221; We don&#8217;t have a choice not to do it because it&#8217;s what we <em>are<\/em> doing. One of the terms for our era geologically is the &#8216;Anthropocene;&#8217; the human-dominated era of geology. And so we&#8217;re already <a title=\"Terraforming\" href=\"http:\/\/www.users.globalnet.co.uk\/~mfogg\/\">terraforming<\/a> the Earth, and we&#8217;re doing it badly. So, is the choice to stop terraforming the Earth? No. Actually that&#8217;s no longer an option. The only choice is to stop doing it badly and start doing it well.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s a large laboratory that we&#8217;re talking about in terms of learning from our mistakes, because we&#8217;ll be conducting our experiments (geo-engineering, bio-engineering, etc) in the world.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re running an experiment in the world anyway by raising the greenhouse gas percentage in the atmosphere, and we&#8217;re starting to get results from that experiment, and we don&#8217;t like them, so we&#8217;re already doing interventionist science outside the lab in the laboratory of the world. If we don&#8217;t like what&#8217;s happening so far, we have no choice but to do better experimentation and better science and start getting the results that are better.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>How do you respond to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2009-10-13-stewart-brands-nuclear-enthusiasm-falls-short-on-facts-and-logic\">Amory Lovins&#8217; recent article<\/a> on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/\">Grist<\/a>, criticizing your position on nuclear power?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s great that Amory Lovins, who is an old friend, has put up a rebuttal to my chapter on nuclear in the book. I think that&#8217;s absolutely fair and right since my whole chapter is basically a rebuttal of his anti-nuclear arguments.* I respect him enormously for most of the things I think he&#8217;s right about. I think he&#8217;s wrong about nuclear. He thinks I&#8217;m right about most things, and that I&#8217;m wrong about nuclear, so that&#8217;s the debate.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>*Last week we posted highlights from a <a title=\"CW Post\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/08\/an-hour-with-amory-lovins\/\">conversation with Amory Lovins<\/a>, aired originally on KQED&#8217;s <\/em><a title=\"KQED Forum\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kqed.org\/forum\">Forum<\/a><em> program. Brand&#8217;s name was not evoked in those excerpts but Lovins was critical of the idea of a nuclear power revival, dismissing it as financially unsupportable.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Climate Watch sat down with ecologist and futurist Stewart Brand to talk about the rethinking of &#8220;traditional green pieties,&#8221; and about his public disagreement with Amory Lovins over nuclear power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11413,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[179,181,298,390,579,585],"coauthors":[],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-3187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-power","tag-economics","tag-ecosystems","tag-international","tag-nuclear","tag-technology","tag-terraforming"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.13 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Climate Watch sat down with ecologist and futurist Stewart Brand to talk about the rethinking of &quot;traditional green pieties,&quot; and about his public disagreement with Amory Lovins over nuclear power.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-16T23:55:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-02T19:36:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gretchen Weber\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gretchen Weber\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/\",\"name\":\"An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-16T23:55:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-02T19:36:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An Hour with Stewart Brand\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5\",\"name\":\"Gretchen Weber\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/e524b6febe575d1cb1233bc6fc23c0de\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gretchen Weber\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/gweber\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch","og_description":"Climate Watch sat down with ecologist and futurist Stewart Brand to talk about the rethinking of \"traditional green pieties,\" and about his public disagreement with Amory Lovins over nuclear power.","og_url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2009-10-16T23:55:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-02T19:36:40+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/10\/sbjpg-filtered.jpg"}],"author":"Gretchen Weber","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gretchen Weber","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/","name":"An Hour with Stewart Brand | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-16T23:55:17+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-02T19:36:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/10\/16\/an-hour-with-stewart-brand\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An Hour with Stewart Brand"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/f9b8aa644ab929c00fff60cc0fd340f5","name":"Gretchen Weber","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/e524b6febe575d1cb1233bc6fc23c0de","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9b3bceed2622b2e3939de1b6f09681f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gretchen Weber"},"url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/gweber\/"}]}},"template_type":null,"featured_image_type":null,"is_audio_post":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11413"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24876,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3187\/revisions\/24876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=3187"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=3187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}