{"id":23204,"date":"2012-07-24T16:02:10","date_gmt":"2012-07-24T23:02:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=23204"},"modified":"2018-02-01T22:37:26","modified_gmt":"2018-02-01T22:37:26","slug":"water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"

Battle lines are forming as Governor Brown prepares to roll out his proposal for the Delta<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta plays a crucial role in the state\u2019s water supply.” credit=”Josh Cassidy\/KQED<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

On Wednesday, Governor Jerry Brown and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar are expected to announce a multi-billion dollar plan designed to fix California\u2019s longstanding water war in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.<\/p>\n

Their proposal for a 35-mile water tunnel is set to reignite the fight over how water is exported from the Delta. The announcement comes just months after federal and state wildlife agencies warned that the proposed version of the project could have dramatic impacts on Delta fish.<\/p>\n

Political wrangling over the governor\u2019s announcement has already begun. Two weeks ago, 11 members of Congress<\/a> [PDF] urged officials to release more details about the costs and benefits of the plan before moving ahead. Senators Feinstein and Boxer sent a letter <\/a>in support of the plan and urged them to meet the February, 2013 deadline to complete it.<\/p>\n

History of Controversy<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Delta isn\u2019t a place that most Californians know much about, as recent polls<\/a> have shown, but the inland estuary just east of San Francisco Bay plays a crucial role in the state\u2019s water supply. Delta water is pumped hundreds of miles across the state, reaching Silicon Valley, Southern California cities and millions of acres of farmland in the Central Valley.<\/p>\n

California\u2019s dependence on this supply has come with an ecological cost. Ten years ago, fish populations in the Delta crashed, including Delta smelt and longfin smelt. Numbers of endangered Chinook salmon were so low in 2008 that the commercial salmon fishery closed for two years.<\/p>\n

Scientists point to a number of causes for this: loss of habitat, pollution, poor ocean conditions for salmon. But studies have shown significant fish losses at the massive pumping facilities in the south Delta, where water that would normally flow out to San Francisco Bay is diverted south. Others say that in some years, too much water was exported, not leaving enough in the ecosystem.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
California’s Deadlocked Delta: Explore our series on the Delta.\u00a0” credit=”KQED \/ Bill Lane Center<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

After a decade of litigation over water exports, the state began developing the Bay Delta Conservation Plan<\/a>, largely financed by the water contractors that use Delta exports. The plan revives the idea of the \u201cperipheral canal\u201d \u2013 a massive water infrastructure project that would take water farther upstream of the Delta and divert it south. The plan also calls for 65,000 acres of tidal habitat restoration.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe potential of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan is enormous for the state of California,\u201d says Karla Nemeth of California\u2019s Natural Resources Agency. \u201cIt would be the most significant upgrade and modernization of the water projects in decades.\u201d
\n
\nRaising a Red Flag<\/strong><\/p>\n

The plan contains several alternatives for the \u201cperipheral tunnel,\u201d both in size and location. Earlier this year, the leading proposal was to build the largest tunnel facility with a capacity to move 15,000 cubic feet per second of water. A state analysis showed that it would export near-record volumes of water from the ecosystem (see page 34<\/a> [PDF]).<\/p>\n

That raised concerns with wildlife agencies, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. The agencies have the power to approve or deny a permit for the project based on its impact to endangered Chinook salmon and Delta smelt.<\/p>\n

In April, the two agencies released a document<\/a> [PDF] listing their concerns. \u201cWe need to be able to make a finding that the project as a whole is going to contribute to the recovery of the species,\u201d says Carl Wilcox of the Department of Fish and Game. \u201cIf the analysis says, well, they\u2019re going to do worse under the plan, we\u2019re not going to be able to permit it.\u201d<\/p>\n

The plan showed an impact on endangered winter-run Chinook salmon, which depend on spawning ground below Shasta Dam. \u201cThe water quality conditions were going to be degraded to the point where they were going to be further jeopardized,\u201d says Wilcox. \u201cLongfin smelt is dependent on a certain amount of outflow through the Delta in the spring to achieve positive population growth. And what we were finding was that wasn\u2019t going to be achieved and the population was going to decline.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since then, Wilcox says talks with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan writers have been productive. \u201cConsequently, we expect to be seeing a change in the proposed project to respond to those concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n

That appeared to be the case at the Bay Delta Conservation Plan meeting in June, where officials referenced a smaller tunnel project that would move 9,000 cubic feet per second.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve been taking a look at some of the footprint issues,\u201d says Nemeth. \u201cWe are very concerned about impacts to local communities and looking at ways where we can size a facility that can deal with securing water supplies and that can advance the recovery of fish species. That\u2019s been the primary driver for the sizing of facilities as smaller as what had been proposed in February.\u201d<\/p>\n

Opposition Heats Up<\/strong><\/p>\n

The most heated criticism of the plan has come from groups representing farmers and communities in the Delta, concerned about the construction footprint. \u201cGovernor Brown’s plan, an enormous mistake, would exterminate salmon runs, destroy sustainable Delta family farms and saddle taxpayers with tens of billions in debt, mainly to benefit a small number of growers on the west side of the Central Valley,\u201d said Restore the Delta,<\/a> in a recent statement.<\/p>\n

Financing the plan may still be the largest hurdle for the state. Water users would pay for the construction of the $13 billion tunnel, while funding for habitat restoration would come from state and federal sources, including part of the $11 billion water bond, recently pushed back to the 2014 ballot.<\/p>\n

Water users haven\u2019t come out against the smaller tunnel, but say deliveries will still be their bottom line. \u201cIt depends on how the 9,000 CFS project is operated,\u201d says Jason Peltier of Westlands Water District, an agricultural area that depends on Delta water.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we build a 9,000 cubic feet per second diversion but the fishery agencies say you can only operate it this minimalist amount of time, it\u2019s not going to provide the water supply and reliability benefits that we\u2019re looking for. And maybe we don\u2019t have a project.\u201d<\/p>\n

Still, Peltier says they\u2019re willing to work with the state over the next decade as more scientific study is done. \u201cWe\u2019ve evolved our thinking in recognizing that we can\u2019t today, with anything other than a guess, say how the project will be operated in 15 years.\u201d<\/p>\n

Despite the fact that previous planning efforts have failed, Peltier believes that this time there\u2019s a consensus on all sides that a solution needs to be found. \u201cTo not decide is to decide, also, and inaction is unacceptable. I think that\u2019s a pretty uniformly felt feeling.\u201d<\/p>\n

A version of this post originally appeared on KQED’s <\/em>News Fix<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Battle lines are forming as Governor Brown prepares to roll out his proposal for the Delta<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":239,"featured_media":23216,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,7],"tags":[484],"coauthors":[],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-23204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-government-business","category-kqedblogs","category-water","tag-sacramento-san-joaquin-delta"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"\nWater Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Battle lines are forming as Governor Brown prepares to roll out his proposal for the Delta\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-07-24T23:02:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-01T22:37:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2012\/07\/Delta_042312_JoshC_8324-300x206.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"206\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Lauren Sommer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Lauren Sommer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/\",\"name\":\"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-24T23:02:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-01T22:37:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/2028303b891a88d762725b47b4b689ed\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/2028303b891a88d762725b47b4b689ed\",\"name\":\"Lauren Sommer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/fb47fb7f6f643a79f68702c434e94f49\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33aa3772bb86c6ad45b8aca6a238bbdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33aa3772bb86c6ad45b8aca6a238bbdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Lauren Sommer\"},\"description\":\"Lauren is a radio reporter formerly covering environment, water, and energy for KQED Science. As part of her day job, she has scaled Sierra Nevada peaks, run from charging elephant seals, and desperately tried to get her sea legs - all in pursuit of good radio. Her work has appeared on Marketplace, Living on Earth, Science Friday and NPR's Morning Edition and All Things Considered. You can find her on Twitter at @lesommer.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/laurensommer\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch","og_description":"Battle lines are forming as Governor Brown prepares to roll out his proposal for the Delta","og_url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2012-07-24T23:02:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-01T22:37:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":206,"url":"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2012\/07\/Delta_042312_JoshC_8324-300x206.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Lauren Sommer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Lauren Sommer","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/","url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/","name":"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-24T23:02:10+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-01T22:37:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/2028303b891a88d762725b47b4b689ed"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2012\/07\/24\/water-wars-may-reignite-over-massive-water-plan\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Water Wars May Reignite Over Massive Delta Plan"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/2028303b891a88d762725b47b4b689ed","name":"Lauren Sommer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/fb47fb7f6f643a79f68702c434e94f49","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33aa3772bb86c6ad45b8aca6a238bbdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33aa3772bb86c6ad45b8aca6a238bbdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Lauren Sommer"},"description":"Lauren is a radio reporter formerly covering environment, water, and energy for KQED Science. As part of her day job, she has scaled Sierra Nevada peaks, run from charging elephant seals, and desperately tried to get her sea legs - all in pursuit of good radio. Her work has appeared on Marketplace, Living on Earth, Science Friday and NPR's Morning Edition and All Things Considered. You can find her on Twitter at @lesommer.","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/laurensommer\/"}]}},"template_type":null,"featured_image_type":null,"is_audio_post":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/239"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23204"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24528,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23204\/revisions\/24528"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=23204"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=23204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}