{"id":1906,"date":"2009-06-29T12:53:31","date_gmt":"2009-06-29T20:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=1906"},"modified":"2009-06-29T12:53:31","modified_gmt":"2009-06-29T20:53:31","slug":"keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/","title":{"rendered":"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n

\"Pacific
Photo: Pacific sunset by Reed Galin<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

California, as I noted last fall<\/a> as part of the series “Solar Realities<\/a>,” has more solar self-generation than any other state in the nation by far. Now, if you ask the folks in the solar division of the California Public Utilities Commission<\/a>, this state of affairs has a lot to do with three policies:<\/p>\n

\n

\n

    \n
  1. The California Solar Initiative<\/a> (CSI) provides rebates to cover about a fifth of the cost of installing solar systems.<\/li>\n
  2. Simplified Interconnection exempts solar customers from interconnection fees and the cost of the studies required to connect their equipment to the electricity grid.<\/li>\n
  3. Net Energy Metering<\/a> allows solar power generators, who run the meter backwards as well as forwards, a credit<\/em> on their power bills at “full retail electricity rates”–as opposed to the wholesale power price.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The policies were designed to encourage civilians to install solar for their own use;\u00a0not necessarily to create an incentive for thousands of home power plants to serve the grid (depending on the size and location of your home, you may not be able to meet all your own electricity needs, let alone deliver surplus to the grid).<\/p>\n

    But if you can<\/em> generate more solar power than you need, why not?<\/p>\n

    \n

    Adam Browning of the Vote Solar initiative<\/a>, put it this way to the San Jose Mercury News<\/em><\/a>: \u201cWhy are we talking about stamping on the brakes when we should be talking about pushing on the accelerator?\u201d<\/p>\n

    \n

    Enter Assembly Bill 560<\/a>. Net metering is currently capped at 2.5 % of the system’s peak energy demand or “load.” Once the stream of solar electrons coming onto the grid reaches that level,\u00a0 the utility is not obligated to sign more net-metering contracts. AB 560, courtesy of Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D-Oakland), would provide some more headroom for that program by raising the cap to 10%.<\/p>\n

    \n

    AB 560 has passed the Assembly. Tomorrow, it comes up before the state Senate Energy, Utilities, and Communications Committee.\u00a0 No doubt, a staff report due out the same day from the CPUC on the status of the California Solar Initiative will give the discussion some extra “juice.”<\/p>\n

    Meanwhile another bill, AB 920<\/a>, from Assemblyman Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), would change the way customers with solar installations are paid for surplus power. As I noted, they now get credited on their monthly bill at the full retail rate. Some of that credit is offset by \u201cregular\u201d power the solar customer uses at night or on cloudy days. Then, at the end of the year, leftover credits are zeroed out. AB 920 would require utilities to pay for credits left over at year-end, albeit at a lower rate–or allow the extra to be rolled over to the next year.<\/p>\n

    The CPUC, by the way, has come out in support<\/a> of AB 560, but not<\/em> AB 920.<\/p>\n

    The state’s three investor owned utilities dislike both bills; especially Pacific Gas & Electric<\/a>, which is closest to approaching that 2.5% cap. About 30,000 of PG&E\u2019s 6 million customers have solar systems.<\/p>\n

    PG&E contends that expanding its home solar program would burden the rest of\u00a0its customers,\u00a0who bankroll the state rebates for solar installations. And because solar customers buy less electricity from the utility, PG&E argues they don\u2019t contribute as much as others to cover the costs of transmission and generation.<\/p>\n

    PG&E has said it would support raising the net-metering cap to 3%–but wants to see a cost-benefit analysis from the CPUC before supporting any further home solar expansion. That report\u2019s due out in January.<\/p>\n

    There are those outside the industry who share PG&E\u2019s concerns. Framing it as a class issue, the non-profit Utility Reform Network<\/a> opposes raising the cap unless changes are made to allow non<\/em>-solar ratepayers to share in the benefits.\u00a0 Even with the current subsidies, going solar requires an often daunting up-front investment. As green becomes the color du jour for businesses and politicians, an increasing number of projects pair solar with low-income housing. But more often than not, your typical solar-powered household in California is likely to be well heeled.<\/p>\n

    As utilities enthusiastically pursue their own large scale solar projects<\/a>, some solar advocates suspect that the companies are really worried that wide-scale residential solar would cut into their income. PG&E\u00a0counters\u00a0that state regulations eliminate the financial incentive for investor-owned utilities to simply sell more power to make more money.<\/p>\n

    All this raises a key question: Without lifting the cap on net metering, can California achieve its goal of 3,000 solar megawatts<\/a> by 2016?<\/p>\n

    Rachael Myrow is host of The California Report<\/a>, produced by KQED and heard on public radio stations throughout the state.<\/em><\/p>\n

    Editor’s Update: The CPUC’s latest report shows a near doubling in the rate of\u00a0 installed capacity, from 2007 to 2008, and so far, data would seem to indicate a continuing trend this year. Installed\u00a0 capacity to date puts the CSI at 13 percent of the total program goal, with another eight percent pending. <\/em><\/p>\n

    \n

    \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    California’s solar explosion may soon be muffled, depending on which direction we go with a wonky-sounding program called “net metering.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,5],"tags":[148,382,425,435,530],"coauthors":[],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-1906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government-business","category-power","tag-cpuc","tag-net-metering","tag-pge","tag-policy","tag-solar"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"\nKeeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"California's solar explosion may soon be muffled, depending on which direction we go with a wonky-sounding program called "net metering."\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/06\/pacific-sunset-e_blog1.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rachael Myrow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@rachaelmyrow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rachael Myrow\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/\",\"name\":\"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/daecf0aad647a830182e5dcfd8970a1c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/daecf0aad647a830182e5dcfd8970a1c\",\"name\":\"Rachael Myrow\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2487ba90516f8dde28d300dc0ddfc284\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87bf8cb5874e045cdff430523a6d48b1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87bf8cb5874e045cdff430523a6d48b1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rachael Myrow\"},\"description\":\"\u2022 I write and edit stories about how Silicon Valley power and policies shape everyday life in California. I\u2019m also passionate about making Bay Area history and culture more accessible to a broad public.\u00a0\u2022 I\u2019ve been a journalist for most of my life, starting in high school with The Franklin Press in Los Angeles, where I grew up. While earning my first degree in English at UC Berkeley, I got my start in public radio at KALX-FM. After completing a second degree in journalism at Cal, I landed my first professional job at Marketplace, then moved on to KPCC (now LAist), and then KQED, where I hosted The California Report for more than seven years. \u2022 My reporting has appeared on NPR, The World, WBUR\u2019s Here & Now, and the BBC. I also guest host for KQED\u2019s Forum, as well as the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. \u2022 I speak periodically on media, democracy and technology issues, and do voiceover work for documentaries and educational video projects. \u2022 Outside of the studio, you'll find me hiking Bay Area trails and whipping up Insta-ready meals in my kitchen. \u2022 I do not accept gifts, money, or favors from anyone connected to my reporting, I don't pay people for information, and I do not support or donate to political causes. \u2022 I strive to treat the people I report on with fairness, honesty, and respect. I also recognize there are often multiple sides to a story and work to verify information through multiple sources and documentation. If I get something wrong, I correct it.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/rachaelmyrow\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/rachaelmyrow\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCQmgU5w4SDAsZUqqnuAIRkg\",\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/rmyrow\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/rachael-myrow\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch","og_description":"California's solar explosion may soon be muffled, depending on which direction we go with a wonky-sounding program called \"net metering.\"","og_url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2009\/06\/pacific-sunset-e_blog1.jpg"}],"author":"Rachael Myrow","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@rachaelmyrow","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rachael Myrow","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/","name":"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00","dateModified":"2009-06-29T20:53:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/daecf0aad647a830182e5dcfd8970a1c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2009\/06\/29\/keeping-the-sizzle-in-california-solar\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Keeping the Sizzle in California Solar"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/daecf0aad647a830182e5dcfd8970a1c","name":"Rachael Myrow","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2487ba90516f8dde28d300dc0ddfc284","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87bf8cb5874e045cdff430523a6d48b1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87bf8cb5874e045cdff430523a6d48b1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rachael Myrow"},"description":"\u2022 I write and edit stories about how Silicon Valley power and policies shape everyday life in California. I\u2019m also passionate about making Bay Area history and culture more accessible to a broad public.\u00a0\u2022 I\u2019ve been a journalist for most of my life, starting in high school with The Franklin Press in Los Angeles, where I grew up. While earning my first degree in English at UC Berkeley, I got my start in public radio at KALX-FM. After completing a second degree in journalism at Cal, I landed my first professional job at Marketplace, then moved on to KPCC (now LAist), and then KQED, where I hosted The California Report for more than seven years. \u2022 My reporting has appeared on NPR, The World, WBUR\u2019s Here & Now, and the BBC. I also guest host for KQED\u2019s Forum, as well as the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. \u2022 I speak periodically on media, democracy and technology issues, and do voiceover work for documentaries and educational video projects. \u2022 Outside of the studio, you'll find me hiking Bay Area trails and whipping up Insta-ready meals in my kitchen. \u2022 I do not accept gifts, money, or favors from anyone connected to my reporting, I don't pay people for information, and I do not support or donate to political causes. \u2022 I strive to treat the people I report on with fairness, honesty, and respect. I also recognize there are often multiple sides to a story and work to verify information through multiple sources and documentation. If I get something wrong, I correct it.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/rachaelmyrow\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/rachaelmyrow","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCQmgU5w4SDAsZUqqnuAIRkg","https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/rmyrow"],"url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/rachael-myrow\/"}]}},"template_type":null,"featured_image_type":null,"is_audio_post":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=1906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}