{"id":15346,"date":"2011-09-19T19:05:46","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T02:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=15346"},"modified":"2018-02-02T00:10:47","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T00:10:47","slug":"salazar-risky-times-for-western-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/09\/19\/salazar-risky-times-for-western-water\/","title":{"rendered":"Salazar: Risky Times for Western Water"},"content":{"rendered":"

Interior Chief to California: Don’t allow significant water supply and infrastructure projects be derailed<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"
Demonstrators rally in 2006 for the removal of dams on the Klamath RIver.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Today at the Commonwealth Club<\/a> in San Francisco, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar weighed in on three major water projects in the state and called on Californians to “stand firm” and defend the “hard-gained agreements and settlements” built in past decades.<\/p>\n

“Never before have water agreements that provide safety and certainty for Westerners been so at risk,” said Salazar, referring to debates over the future of the San Joaquin River, the California Bay Delta, and the Klamath River.<\/p>\n

Salazar argued that the state, and the country, should not back away from the 2006 San Joaquin River Restoration Program<\/a> settlement, which, he said enabled the river to run from its headwaters to the ocean this year for the first time in half a century. He lobbied for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan<\/a>, calling it a “comprehensive approach that includes new habitat for endangered fish species, coordinated measures to attack toxics that are fouling delta waters, and improvements to the state\u2019s water infrastructure.” <\/p>\n

Salazar said he will be ruling on the proposal to remove four dams along the Klamath River in March of next year.\u00a0 In recent years both fish populations<\/a> and agricultural interests<\/a> have suffered from drought along the oversubscribed river.\u00a0 In 2009, negotiators representing a wide array of interests agreed on a settlement<\/a> that would remove four hydroelectric dams by 2020 as part of an agreement to restore historic salmon runs while keeping irrigation for the region’s farmers.<\/p>\n

Salazar said Monday that the cost of removing the dams would be $290 million, far less than the $450 million originally estimated. He offered a preview of the impacts of the dam removals and river restoration, according to the DOI’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which is due to be released Thursday. The report includes the following findings, he said:<\/p>\n