{"id":10773,"date":"2011-02-08T11:01:42","date_gmt":"2011-02-08T19:01:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?p=10773"},"modified":"2018-02-02T00:51:34","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T00:51:34","slug":"why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/","title":{"rendered":"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap &#038; Trade"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Environmental Justice groups say they support California&#8217;s climate law. So why did they sue?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Environmentalists may seem the most unlikely of sources stalling the state&#8217;s landmark climate change law. But the case brought by a group of <a title=\"EPA - EJ\" href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/environmentaljustice\/\">environmental justice<\/a> advocates is bringing up issues that have been largely overlooked in the zeal of carrying forward AB 32.<\/p>\n<figure  id=\"attachment_10805\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 300px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/dont-trade_crop_ah-3\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-10805\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10805\" title=\"dont-trade_crop_AH\" src=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"288\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2.jpg 300w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2-160x154.jpg 160w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2-240x230.jpg 240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Photo: Center on Race, Poverty &amp; the Environment)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This means that a California power plant can increase CO2 emissions if it buys allowances from another industry that&#8217;s reducing emissions, or offsets from, say, a tree farm in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe evidence out there is that cap-and-trade is going to fail these communities and will continue to allow polluters to dump on them, and that&#8217;s unacceptable and it&#8217;s also illegal,\u201d said Alegria De La Cruz, legal director at the <a title=\"CRPE - main\" href=\"http:\/\/www.crpe-ej.org\/crpe\/\">Center on Race, Poverty &amp; the Environment<\/a> in San Francisco. The Center is a plaintiff in a <a title=\"CW - blog post\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/02\/is-ab-32-headed-for-the-rocks\/\">lawsuit<\/a> filed by several organizations over the implementation plan for AB 32. Parties in that case are awaiting finalization of a state court ruling that could hold up the scheduled launch of California&#8217;s cap &amp; trade plan.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>De La Cruz says the industrial sector, including oil refineries and power plants, are a problem for nearby communities like Richmond in the Bay Area and Wilmington, near Los Angeles.<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<p>Citing the pending litigation, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arb.ca.gov\/homepage.htm\">California Air Resources Board<\/a> declined to comment on environmental justice concerns, and instead referred me to UCLA law professor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.ucla.edu\/faculty\/all-faculty-profiles\/professors\/Pages\/ann-e-carlson.aspx\">Ann Carlson<\/a>, faculty director of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.ucla.edu\/centers-programs\/emmett-center-on-climate-change-and-the-environment\/Pages\/default.aspx\">Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Carlson agrees that there&#8217;s nothing in the regulations that ensures communities living close to refineries, power plants, and other polluting sources see a direct benefit from cap-and-trade. But, she says, industries will still be subject to other environmental laws like the Clean Air Act, which prevent them from exceeding certain limits on conventional pollutants that are harmful to public health.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;AB 32 in no way relaxes existing environmental laws so I don&#8217;t see how there is more [conventional] pollution because they continue to be regulated in the same fashion as previously,&#8221; Carlson says.<\/p>\n<p>De La Cruz brought up another problem she sees with cap-and-trade: its exemption of the agricultural sector, which emits <a href=\"http:\/\/eetd.lbl.gov\/news-archives\/news-methane.html\">large amounts of methane<\/a>, a potent greenhouse gas and air pollutant.<\/p>\n<figure  id=\"attachment_10774\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\" style=\"max-width: 800px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10774 size-medium\" title=\"Socorro-sign\" src=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-800x600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-800x600.jpg 800w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-160x120.jpg 160w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-1020x765.jpg 1020w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-1920x1440.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-1180x885.jpg 1180w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-960x720.jpg 960w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-240x180.jpg 240w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-375x281.jpg 375w, https:\/\/cdn.kqed.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/Socorro-sign1-520x390.jpg 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Center on Race, Poverty, and the Environment<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cAgricultural communities are even more problematic because they&#8217;re actually going to be allowed to be <a href=\"http:\/\/migration.ucdavis.edu\/rmn\/more.php?id=1474_0_5_0\">offsets<\/a>,\u201d she says. \u201cSo you&#8217;re taking an industry that&#8217;s a polluting industry and calling it something that really mis-characterizes what it does to the environment. It really doesn&#8217;t make sense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Carlson says she believes CARB exempted the agricultural sector because it&#8217;s hard to measure and control farmland emissions, since there is no single source. She says that she believes CARB is being very careful of what qualifies for offsets, a mechanism which allows industry to &#8220;offset&#8221; some of their own emissions by funding qualified projects to reduce emissions elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>The environmental justice groups are using litigation to try and force the California Air Resources Board to reconsider the cap-and-trade portion of the law. De La Cruz says there are other options to cap-and-trade. The state could directly regulate polluters by placing a fee on carbon. The money generated could, in part, go toward a rebate for low-income people to buy higher-priced energy.<\/p>\n<p>The state has nine years to meet the AB 32 greenhouse gas reduction targets. Enough time, says De La Cruz says, to retool cap-and-trade without causing delays. She said environmental justice groups <em>do<\/em> want to see AB 32 succeed&#8211;but not at the expense of poor communities.<\/p>\n<p><em>Alison Hawkes is a San Francisco-based freelance reporter and co-founder of <a href=\"www.wayoutwestnews.com\">Way Out West News.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Environmental Justice groups say they support California&#8217;s climate law. So why did they sue over it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11424,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[34,193,203,435],"coauthors":[],"series":[],"affiliates":[],"programs":[],"collections":[],"interests":[],"class_list":["post-10773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government-business","tag-assembly-bill-32","tag-emissions","tag-environmental-justice","tag-policy"],"acf":{"template_type":"standard","featured_image_type":"standard","is_audio_post":false},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.13 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap &amp; Trade | Climate Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap &amp; Trade | Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Environmental Justice groups say they support California&#039;s climate law. So why did they sue over it?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-08T19:01:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-02T00:51:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Alison Hawkes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Alison Hawkes\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/\",\"name\":\"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap & Trade | Climate Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-08T19:01:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-02T00:51:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/43196b1465e3dc2f2415422db0584f3e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap &#038; Trade\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Watch\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/43196b1465e3dc2f2415422db0584f3e\",\"name\":\"Alison Hawkes\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/16480fed56e5585b063a3d7f6a3b80c3\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8dcc3ab9753921c9681793a8b786193f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8dcc3ab9753921c9681793a8b786193f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Alison Hawkes\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/alisonhawkes\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap & Trade | Climate Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap & Trade | Climate Watch","og_description":"Environmental Justice groups say they support California's climate law. So why did they sue over it?","og_url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/","og_site_name":"Climate Watch","article_published_time":"2011-02-08T19:01:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-02T00:51:34+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2011\/02\/dont-trade_crop_AH2.jpg"}],"author":"Alison Hawkes","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Alison Hawkes","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/","url":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/","name":"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap & Trade | Climate Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-08T19:01:42+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-02T00:51:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/43196b1465e3dc2f2415422db0584f3e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/2011\/02\/08\/why-ej-groups-are-leery-of-cap-trade\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why EJ Groups are Leery of Cap &#038; Trade"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/","name":"Climate Watch","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/43196b1465e3dc2f2415422db0584f3e","name":"Alison Hawkes","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/16480fed56e5585b063a3d7f6a3b80c3","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8dcc3ab9753921c9681793a8b786193f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8dcc3ab9753921c9681793a8b786193f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Alison Hawkes"},"url":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/author\/alisonhawkes\/"}]}},"template_type":null,"featured_image_type":null,"is_audio_post":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11424"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10773"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24749,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10773\/revisions\/24749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"affiliates","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliates?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"programs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programs?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"collections","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collections?post=10773"},{"taxonomy":"interests","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/climatewatch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/interests?post=10773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}