upper waypoint

Yves Saint Laurent and Couture

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

There was a time when all clothing was “custom made,” sewn at home or ordered from a local tailor or dressmaker. Today, most clothing is purchased “ready made,” from department stores or boutiques, or discount big-box retailers like Wal-Mart. Only the very rich, the very poor, recent immigrants from the Third World, and London bankers still have their clothes made for them. We’ve largely lost, or discarded, this personal relationship between the client and the artisan/producer. We’ve gone from being clients who participate in a creative process to consumers who purchase designers’ ready-made ideas.

Couture is a paradox. As a concept, couture can only exist in an industrialized society, where things are purchased “off the rack,” and not created, one by one, for the client in an atelier. Couture’s value lies in its distance from the ordinary. And yet couture is in danger of being extinguished by the very society that created it. Year by year, the ranks of skilled artisans capable of producing “couture” quality goods diminishes. As the cost of a couture garment rises, the client base shrinks. Today, a couture suit can cost as much as a luxury car — it is not uncommon to spend $50,000 on a Chanel suit — and a ball gown comes with a six-figure price tag.

Yves Saint Laurent, the subject of a grand retrospective at the de Young Museum in San Francisco, was the last of the great couturiers. He belonged to the last generation of couture designers who could still rely on a large and loyal client base. When Saint Laurent first entered the trade, it was still possible for a designer to support his house (his atelier, his salesgirls, his business managers) with the proceeds from his couture business. Today, due to the high cost of couture goods, the design houses survive — and thrive — on licensed goods, on branded perfumes, lipsticks, shoes, and other sundries. The Parisian designers lose money on their couture lines, and recoup it, in spades, through a host of “affordable luxuries” aimed at the mass market.

Saint Laurent’s career bridges the transition between these two periods. When Saint Laurent first began, most French consumers either made their own clothes at home, or ordered their clothes “custom” from local tailors or dressmakers. By 2002, when Saint Laurent retired, most French consumers purchased their clothes “ready made.”

The pieces included in this retrospective track these changes in consumer culture. Saint Laurent’s earliest pieces display a strict, classical formality. They show off the atelier’s formal skills and attention to detail. As the years progress, Saint Laurent’s designs draw increasingly from the street, they become more atmospheric, less formal. The emphasis moves away from the atelier’s impeccable formal skills, and towards showcasing Saint Laurent’s singular vision. The house’s expertise is never in question, but the mood shifts.

Sponsored

Saint Laurent’s most iconic piece remains his evening tuxedo for women, represented here by his 1966 design, made to order for the French actress Francoise Hardy. Borrowed from men’s suiting, the tuxedo still embodies the tailor’s art. Unlike Saint Laurent’s opulent evening gowns or his reworkings of street fashions, the tuxedo retains couture’s original connection to tailoring. It is a garment designed to subtly flatter the client. It mutes the designer’s voice in favor of craft and convention.

The designer’s vision is there, but rather than announcing itself (as the ballgowns do) or dictating a role and a mood (like the “Safari” pieces), the tuxedo works to foreground the client’s body. It is a subtle distinction — whether a design pushes us to look at the woman wearing the dress, or to look at the dress wearing the woman — but the difference is enormous. In one, the woman completes a picture. In the other, the design completes the woman.

Couture now functions largely as a generator of visual images. This season, pirates. Next season, Marie Antoinette at play. We’ve unyoked the intimate relationship between our clothing and our bodies. We buy standardized pieces, cut and sewn in mysterious ways, and allow fashion trends to ebb and flow over our skins. We buy, not so much to flatter our own bodies as to complete our fantasies. Couture provides a key link in that fantasy. It allows us to imagine that a master designs for us. Yet increasingly couture designs are being superseded by images from popular culture — actors and actresses, movie sets, and musicians set our trends.

We have other sources for our dreams.

Yves Saint Laurent is at the de Young Museum through April 5, 2009. For more information, visit famsf.org.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
The Stud, SF's Oldest Queer Bar, Gears Up for a Grand ReopeningThis Sleek Taiwanese Street Food Lounge Serves Beef Noodle Soup Until 2:30 a.m.Minnie Bell’s New Soul Food Restaurant in the Fillmore Is a HomecomingHow a Dumpling Chef Brought Dim Sum to Bay Area Farmers Markets5 New Mysteries and Thrillers for Your Nightstand This SpringYou Can Get Free Ice Cream on Tuesday — No CatchOutside Lands 2024: Tyler, the Creator, The Killers and Sturgill Simpson HeadlineLarry June to Headline Stanford's Free BlackfestA ‘Haunted Mansion’ Once Stood Directly Under Sutro TowerSol Blume Festival Postponed Until 2025