If you’re like most of my colleagues in the newsroom, you read that headline and thought, “GREAT! What is the alternative test?!”

Here’s the quick background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer killer in the U.S. A colonoscopy is an excellent screening tool. But more than one-third of people who are supposed to get it (that’s people ages 50-75) don’t.

Why? I think you can guess.

A colonoscopy is an invasive screening test that can involve missing one to two days of work, an inconvenient preparation process and then a “colonoscope is gently eased inside the colon and sends pictures to a TV screen,” the American Cancer Society says.

But it turns out that there’s a less invasive option. It’s called FIT — fecal immunochemical test — and essentially, you are taking a stool sample at home, in the privacy of your own bathroom. There’s no preparation and there are no dietary restrictions. FIT will detect hidden blood in the stool, a sign of colon cancer or large polyps that could become cancerous.

The American Cancer Society explains how it works:

… blood vessels at the surface of larger colorectal polyps or cancers are often fragile and easily damaged by the passage of feces. The damaged vessels usually release a small amount of blood into the feces, but only rarely is there enough bleeding for blood to be visible in the stool.

FIT is not new — it’s already a recommended screening test from both the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, but few people know about it.

The doctors behind a study published Monday — from UCSF and Kaiser Permanente’s Division of Research — are hoping their research will change that. The researchers conducted what’s called a meta-analysis, a review of existing studies, to reach their conclusion.

In their review, doctors found that FIT correctly identified 80 percent of people who have cancer, and FIT correctly identified more than 94 percent of people who did not have cancer.

Now, you might be thinking the inverse — that 20 percent of people with cancer were missed. But FIT is a test that’s meant to be done annually, and colon cancers generally are slow-growing. “You will be tested (again) after a year goes by,” said Dr. Jeffrey Lee, lead author of the study who works at both Kaiser Permanente’s Division of Research and UCSF. “During year two, the chances that the FIT test will detect it is much higher.”

In addition, if non-cancerous polyps are removed, then patients may well be avoiding a later cancer diagnosis.

Dr. Theodore Levin, another of the study’s authors, heads up colorectal screening for the Permanente Medical Group. Kaiser instituted a coordinated screening approach for its members several years ago, which includes mailing FITs to its members who are not up-to-date on screening. Kaiser’s screening rate is going up and the incidence of colorectal cancer is going down.

“FIT represents a really easy-to-use option for colon screening,” Levin says. “It’s a much easier sell to get people to do the FIT test” than undergo a colonoscopy. “There’s no way around it.”

The study was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.




At-Home Test Good Alternative to Colonoscopy, Study Confirms 5 February,2014Lisa Aliferis

  • kabul

    The Journal of Zoology Studies is a common zoology journal but our service and quality make us different from others. It is an international platform provide open access with online and colour printed version of article publish monthly. Our aim to bring your work in the front of millions of people and hope that it will helpful for all. The Journal of zoology studies respect of all author’s work and their contribution towards the serious subject. With perfection we will continue to provide our best. The Journal of Zoology Studies is not only a journal but it’s a bridge that connect authors to the rest of world.


Lisa Aliferis

Lisa Aliferis is the founding editor of KQED’s State of Health blog. Since 2011, she’s been writing and editing stories for the site. Before taking up blogging, she toiled for many years (more than we can count) producing health stories for television, including Dateline NBC and San Francisco’s CBS affiliate, KPIX-TV. She also wrote up a handy guide to the Affordable Care Act, especially for Californians. Her work has been honored for many awards. Most recently she was a finalist for “Best Topical Reporting” from the Online News Association. You can follow her on Twitter: @laliferis

State of Health Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor