The methane pouring from the leak at the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility isn't visible to the naked eye (Left), but is seen here in an infrared photo (Right) as the green plume coming up from the hillside.

The methane pouring from the leak at the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility isn't visible to the naked eye (Left), but is seen here in an infrared photo (Right) as the green plume coming up from the hillside. (Environmental Defense Fund)

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor

Update: 7 January 2016, 12:20 p.m.

Today, UC Davis released the first estimates of methane emissions from an underground gas storage field north of Los Angeles. Owned by Southern California Gas Company, the gas has been leaking since October.

UC Davis pilot and scientist Stephen Conley measured the plume and estimates nearly 80,000 tons of methane have been released, or about 1,000 tons per day.

“To put this into perspective, the leak effectively doubles the emission rate for the entire Los Angeles Basin,” says Conley.

The methane has traveled and affected nearby Los Angeles suburb Porter Ranch, displacing thousands of residents.

Yesterday, California Governor Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency over the leak and its impact on the Porter Ranch community.

Update: 31 December 2015, 1:45 p.m.

Utility officials in Southern California say they have determined the underground location of a pipe leak that has spewed natural gas into the air since late October, but it could be months before they’re able to fix the rupture that has driven up the state’s methane emissions and chased thousands of families from their homes.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has called the leak an “environmental disaster,” and the Los Angeles Unified School District shuttered two area schools for the rest of the year.

Meanwhile, the leak at Southern California Gas Company’s Aliso Canyon storage facility is pouring methane into the air at a rate equal to putting an additional 7 million cars on the road daily. The Environmental Defense Fund created this real-time counter showing how many metric tons of methane are estimated to have escaped from the Aliso Canyon facility since Oct. 23:


Original Story:

World leaders left Paris over the weekend with an aggressive agreement to cut methane emissions and other so-called short-lived climate pollutants. Methane doesn’t last as long in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, but it’s much more potent. That’s one reason the city of Los Angeles is suing over the methane leak from a natural gas well north of L.A., and it’s why state leaders are concerned about a long-hidden source of methane emissions: leaking natural gas pipelines.

For decades, utilities in California have logged, but not repaired, thousands of pinprick leaks in pipelines criss-crossing the state. These leaks are considered non-hazardous because they don’t pose a health or safety risk. But they do pose an environmental risk. Tim O’Connor, an attorney with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), says not many people, from utilities to state leaders, have been thinking about it.

“It is this hidden environmental issue which is quite significant,” O’Connor says.

If you add up the greenhouse gas emissions coming from all pipeline leaks statewide, he says, it’s as if we’re putting 700,000 more cars on the roads.

Methane is a Potent Greenhouse Gas

Most Californians who care about climate change understand that carbon dioxide emissions are a key part of the problem, but methane – which can seep from landfills, oil and gas infrastructure, wastewater ponds or agricultural facilities – is an important piece of the puzzle when it comes to combating climate change.

“It has a stronger global warming potential,” explains Riley Duren, a climate scientist who has been tracking atmospheric methane with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “On a 20-year timeline, methane is about 80 times more efficient at trapping heat than an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide.”

Right now, the biggest single source of methane emissions in the state is in a hilly territory north of Los Angeles, where a massive natural gas leak from Southern California Gas Company’s underground Aliso Canyon storage field has permeated the nearby community of Porter Ranch with a foul smell, sickening some residents and prompting hundreds to relocate.

“When I moved here, I didn’t know about the gas facility,” said Matt Pakucko, who lives near the leaking gas well and started a grassroots organization called Save Porter Ranch. Even before the leak started, he said, he’d notice the smell of gas sometimes. “Late night or early morning, it smells like natural gas, like my stove is on,” he explained. “I’d call the gas company, they would come out, and nothing in my house was leaking.”

But when the leak started Oct. 23, he said the fumes grew to an extreme level – and started to affect residents’ health. “It was hard to breathe,” he said. “It’s the kind of thing where you call the emergency number. It’s that strong all over the neighborhood.”

Three weeks after the rupture began, the Los Angeles Department of Public Health issued a fact sheet noting that exposure to the methane gas wasn’t expected to cause long-term health impacts, but an additive called mercaptans is known to cause dizziness, respiratory issues, headaches and other short-term health issues. SoCalGas made several unsuccessful attempts to plug the leak, and it’s now drilling a relief well to contain it—a process that could take up to four months.

SoCalGas now faces a class-action lawsuit from residents of Porter Ranch, charging the company showed a “willful disregard for public health,” and a lawsuit from the city of Los Angeles charging that the utility failed to notify residents of the health hazard in a timely manner and didn’t have a sufficient plan in place to repair the breach. The company has also drawn heat from environmentalists.

“At a calculated rate per hour of about 50,000 kilograms of methane emissions, this single leak is likely responsible for over 25 percent of the state’s daily total methane emissions from all sources, including landfills and agriculture,” O’Connor wrote in a recent blog post. “Depending on when it is fixed, this one leak is also likely to single-handedly double the methane emissions associated with natural gas use in California this year.”

While the Aliso Canyon leak has released a staggering amount of heat-trapping gases, leaking natural gas pipelines are a more insidious problem that has persisted for years.

Hidden Source of Climate Change

Non-hazardous pipeline leaks are graded differently from ruptures that cause gas explosions – under state law, utilities must respond immediately if a detected leak is deemed hazardous. But leaks that vent outdoors, or emit only a small amount of gas, are classified as Grade 3 and have historically ranked as utilities’ lowest priority for repair. Usually the amount of gas they leak is so minuscule you can’t smell it, and if they’re venting outdoors, there’s no danger of a gas build-up that could lead to explosion.

Listen to the Story:

“If there are really high levels that could be dangerous, flammable, [utilities] come out immediately,” explains Francesca Hopkins, who works with Duren on the NASA carbon monitoring team. “What we’re talking about is worrying about methane leaks because of their impact on climate, not finding leaks because they’re a public safety hazard. We care because it’s those smaller, long-term leaks that affect global warming.”

The California Air Resources Board estimates gas pipeline leaks will account for 12 percent of the state’s methane emissions by 2030—a problem that will translate to higher utility bills in the long run, since customers pay for that wasted fuel. Policymakers have only recently started taking action to require utilities to fix them.

In 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation requiring utilities to seal non-hazardous pipeline leaks that don’t pose a threat to public safety. Before this policy, it was common practice to simply allow them to vent.

A PG&E crew member uses soap to identify the exact location of a gas pipeline leak.
A PG&E crew member uses soap to identify the exact location of a gas pipeline leak. (Rebecca Bowe/KQED)

“Certain situations — not all, I want to be very clear on this — you’d find some leaks that would go unrepaired for literally years,” said Eric Hofmann, business agent with the SoCalGas utility workers’ union. He said leaks from plastic pipes were more likely to be repaired, but leaks from steel pipes could persist for years.

Partly because the deadly 2010 explosion in San Bruno drew attention to leaky pipelines, and partly because of the new state law, utilities are paying more attention to these small, non-hazardous leaks.

Across the industry, Hofmann said, “there’s definitely been a sense of a more aggressive approach.”

Utilities are currently working with state regulators to formulate long-term plans for complying with the new legislation. In the meantime, Hofmann and others say the gas companies have started adopting new practices, with the recognition that addressing environmentally hazardous leaks is now mandated under state law.

Around the time of this paradigm shift, PG&E adopted new air-monitoring technology that’s 1,000 times more sensitive than the devices it used to rely on. Now they’re finding leaks they couldn’t detect before. In 2014, PG&E reported to regulators that crews found more than 18,800 new, non-hazardous pipeline leaks.

Methane has drawn a lot of attention from policymakers lately. Speaking at a press conference in Paris, Democratic Senator Ricardo Lara of Los Angeles County issued a proposal to slash methane emissions in California to 40 percent below current rates by 2030.

“The scientific evidence is really quite clear,” O’Connor said. “Methane, actual methane into the air, is responsible for 20 to 30 percent of the temperature increases we’re feeling today.”

Methane Leaks: A Visible ‘Environmental Disaster’ and Hidden Threat 7 January,2016Kat Snow

  • Kurt thialfad

    Rebecca, you’ve neglecting to mention the vast amount of methane release by cows! Our agricultural industry is a huge contributor to the problem. You can always fix a gas leak, but reducing our appetite for beef and milk is quite a different story.
    http://animals.howstuffworks.com/mammals/methane-cow.htm

  • Richard Solomon

    KUDOS and thanks for an informative article. IF methane is causing 20-30% of the temp rise we are seeing, it is more than appropriate that these small leaks be addressed. It is imperative. More than 18,000 leaks is a lot. But PG&E should be held accountable for allocating the resources needed to address these….and pronto, in my opinion.

    As noted below, people’s appetite for meat and dairy products is another aspect to this issue that should be addressed. Can there be ways for the meat and dairy industries to capture this methane?

  • Bob Ackley

    Traditional natural gas detection equipment, the flame ionization detector, can find all the gas leaks. The problem is that repairing natural gas distribution leaks is a money loser for natural gas companies as natural gas companies can pass any leaked gas costs back onto the ratepayers and they cannot pass the leak repair costs due to deregulation. Most natural gas operators have ignored leaks due to corrosion and mechanical failure for years as these types of leaks rarely lead to building explosions but can lead to manhole explosions. The new super duper technology out there documents all gas readings and puts a gps tag on the readings, something that the traditional equipment does not do and therefore there is no way to hide the readings. The cat is now out of the bag due to a major study that we did in DC: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/16/washington-dc-gas-pipeline-leaks/4497083/ fix the pipes….

  • Theodora Crawford

    Why has it taken you all so long to acknowledge the dangers of Methane!!!