Last week I gave a walking tour of the Hayward fault along the Oakland-Berkeley border. Among other things, I talked about the fault’s peculiar behavior called aseismic creep, in which the two sides of the fault move slowly past each other at just a few millimeters per year without the help of earthquakes. I pointed out places where creep has been gently distorting the streets. I explained that creep doesn’t remove much earthquake energy because it only affects shallow parts of the fault that can’t store much energy anyway. But I couldn’t say much more about it because geologists studying the creep problem have lots of questions, several hypotheses, and no answers.

Hayward fault creep
The creeping Hayward fault crosses Oakland’s Stonewall Road in 2001. All of this has since been rebuilt. Photo by Andrew Alden

Just days later, the September issue of the journal Geology came out with a paper that makes an intriguing connection between our creeping faults and slow activity on the other side of the Sierra Nevada microplate, where the Earth’s outer shell is secretly splitting apart.

(That’s right: The heart of California—the Central Valley and the mountains that ring it—is a separate tectonic plate, bounded by fault zones all the way around. The Sierra Nevada microplate rotates slightly and moves northwest at a few millimeters per year relative to the rest of the North America plate. California really is different from its neighbors.)

Fault creep is quite uncommon in general, but a big central section of the San Andreas fault complex is creeping today while on either side the fault is locked, building up energy for large earthquakes like the 1906 quake in Northern California and the 1857 Fort Tejon quake in Southern California. The so-called creeping section runs from the village of Parkfield east of Paso Robles up to San Juan Bautista. Near there the Calaveras fault splits off from the San Andreas, and in turn the Hayward fault splits off from the Calaveras—and both of those faults also creep. See them shown in blue in this figure from the Geology paper. The authors are Laetitia Le Pourhiet, a French geophysicist, and Jason Saleeby, a geologist at Caltech’s Tectonics Observatory who has studied the southern Sierra Nevada for decades.

Figure 1 Le Pourhiet-Saleeby paper
Figure 1 of Le Pourhiet and Saleeby, “Lithospheric convective instability could induce creep along part of the San Andreas fault,” Geology v. 41, p. 999-1002 (Sept. 2013). Stars mark notable earthquakes in (north to south) 1906, 1989, 1983, 2004 and 1857.

One of Saleeby’s most interesting lines of research is exploring how the dense rocky root of the southern Sierra broke off (delaminated) and sank into the hotter, softer mantle beneath to form a “lithospheric drip” starting about 4 million years ago. On the east side of the Sierra, the mountains responded by springing upward to create the dramatic eastern face that includes Mount Whitney, highest peak in the 48 states.

Southern Sierra Nevada
East face of the southern Sierra Nevada at Owens Lake. Photo courtesy Matthew Lee High of Flickr via Creative Commons license

The “Big Drip”, if I may call it that, is bending and twisting the rest of our microplate. On its west side, the drip is still attached and pulling down on the crust. The result is that the southern Great Valley is at its widest and deepest there, in the Tulare geologic basin. If you think of the Earth’s crust across central California as an air mattress floating in a pool, imagine a swimmer grabbing it in the middle from below and pulling down. The east end (the Sierra) bends upward and the middle (the Tulare basin) bends down.

What happens farther west? Le Pourhiet did the computer modeling to show that the west side of the microplate arches upward by a hundred feet or so. That side is pinned against the San Andreas fault so it can’t simply break and spring upward like the eastern Sierra, which is being pulled away from Nevada.

Sierra Nevada microplate warpage
Part of Figure 3 of the Geology paper; colors show the calculated vertical movements in response to the Big Drip.

When the authors fed that result into a model of the San Andreas fault’s physics, the model accounted for the size and nature of the creeping section. There, most of the fault between the surface and its base at around 15 kilometers depth turns out weak and slippery, and only a narrow band of rock in the middle of that range has enough friction to gather a lot of strain energy. For the creeping section the model suggests a pattern of earthquakes no bigger than magnitude 6 or so, plus lots of creep. (In this picture the Bay Area is near the edge of that pattern, so while our faults creep they still are considered able to clobber us with magnitude-7 events.)

So is any of this a scientific fact? Not yet; it’s just another good hypothesis that fits a variety of data but needs refinement. Scientific consensus is when everyone accepts a good hypothesis and moves ahead because they’ve run out of good counterarguments. We definitely haven’t reached that point for the San Andreas fault system. In the meantime, I can show you examples of Hayward fault creep in Hayward, in Fremont and in Pinole.

How California’s Warping Microplate Makes Its Faults Creep 5 September,2013Andrew Alden

  • MaryMactavish

    I know this might seem intimate, cut I just want to snuggle up with this article. it shares ago much about California that is incredible and fascinating. I love the detail and simple explanations.

    I walk over a tiny compression ridge one block to get to the playground with my kid. That playground lies on a walking tour of the Hayward Fault. The condition of the driveways on that ridge tell me what I want to know about investing in a house on that ridge.

    I love living here.

  • Josiah Tribble

    California is indeed a unique state as in referring to geology, there’s been so many earthquakes that have shaken that state for many thousands of years before this region became a state or even a territory of the young United States. It’s because of all this tectonic activity that there’s the modern day mountains we see and the beauty of this state. Your probably wondering why there’s so many fault lines in California? I’ve got the answer, when these two tectonic plates that are the north American plate and the Pacific plates collided, it cause so much buckling that the many fractures occurred on the landscape forming the many faults in California that we have today and, the fractures didn’t only occur on the western half of California, it occurred on either side of the collision of the tectonic plates. It’s because of all these faults that were created when the tectonic plates converged is what makes California the actual earthquake capitol of the country. One more tid bit here for you all, California not only has faults that cause earthquakes but, there’s many active volcanoes in California as well such as; Mammoth, Lassen, Shasta, Inyo Craters and Mono Craters, Salton Buttes, Golden Trout Creek, Clear Lake, Mono Lake Volcanic Field, Ubehebe Crater in Death Valley, and Medicine Lake.


Andrew Alden

Andrew Alden earned his geology degree at the University of New Hampshire and moved back to the Bay Area to work at the U.S. Geological Survey for six years. He has written on geology for since its founding in 1997. In 2007, he started the Oakland Geology blog, which won recognition as “Best of the East Bay” from the East Bay Express in 2010. In writing about geology in the Bay Area and surroundings, he hopes to share some of the useful and pleasurable insights that geologists give us—not just facts about the deep past, but an attitude that might be called the deep present.

Read his previous contributions to QUEST, a project dedicated to exploring the Science of Sustainability.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor