upper waypoint

Should Techies Be Able to Put a Price on Free Street Parking?

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The Mission District is ground zero for tough parking and an incubator for many start-up solutions (Shawn Hoke/Flickr)
The Mission District is ground zero for tough parking and an incubator for many startup solutions. (Shawn Hoke/Flickr)

There's a storm brewing in San Francisco over one of the city's hottest commodities — street parking. Several startup tech companies are trying to solve the headache of endless circling in search of a spot. Billing the ideas as part of the "sharing economy," companies like Sweetch and MonkeyParking propose using smartphone apps (what else?) to alert other users that a spot will be opening up and charge them for the privilege of being in the right place at the right time.

But the idea has people riled up about technocrats making money off public space. Sweetch in particular is aimed at the busy Mission District and encourages users to donate the $5 they get for their parking spot to a charity of their choice. If a user chooses to keep the money, he or she pays a 20 percent transaction fee.

Mission Local has been following the apps-will-solve-all-your-parking-problems trend, as well as an online conversation between neighbors and the co-founders of Sweetch, Thomas Cottin and Aboud Jardaneh.

Cottin and Jardaneh say they will easily be able to see when drivers are abusing the system and can block them.

When they tried to explain this on Nextdoor, what ensued was a lively discussion that in large part urged them to reconsider their app.

“You know people will find a way to capitalize on this, to abuse this,” wrote one participant. While she understood the madness of finding parking and would sometimes even be willing to pay, she added, the system was fraught with problems. “I think you need to re-evaluate what kind of resource your app was trying to provide, whether it is actually resourceful.”

Another, stating flatly that Sweetch was a “terrible idea,” wondered what would happen if she was driving around and tried to pull into a spot already promised to a Sweetch driver. “Do I need to fight for my right to park?” she asked.

Another pointed out that $5 a day is pocket change for “some of us, but it is grocery money for a large number of families in the Mission.”

The Sweetch co-founders say the pushback they are seeing stems from a generational divide, and that soon this kind of service will be common and accepted. In their eyes, information is a commodity people will pay for. And in this case, knowing where that perfect street spot is going to open up saves drivers time and gas.

What do you think of ideas like this? A miracle solution to parking problems or a misuse of public space?

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
California Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesAlameda: The Island That Almost Wasn’tJust Days Left to Apply for California Program That Helps Pay for Your First HouseIn Fresno’s Chinatown, High-Speed Rail Sparks Hope and Debate Within ResidentsFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailRainn Wilson from ‘The Office’ on Why We Need a Spiritual RevolutionIs California Headed For Another Tax Revolt?Will Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?NPR's Sarah McCammon on Leaving the Evangelical ChurchState Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some Workers