upper waypoint

San Jose Strengthens Protections for Mobile Home Park Residents

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Owners of the Winchester Ranch mobile home park in San Jose want to sell the land to make way for new development. Senior and low-income residents fear that if the deal goes through, they'll have nowhere else they can afford in the city (Mark Andrew Boyer/KQED)

San Jose is grappling with how to help residents of mobile home parks stave off potential displacement, as owners of the Winchester Ranch Mobile Home Park plan to sell their land to make way for profitable new developments in a sizzling real estate market.

Many of the 35,000 San Jose residents living in mobile homes -- the most of any city in the state -- own their houses but rent the land they sit on. These parks are already under a city rent-control ordinance, with annual increases limited to 3-7 percent.

At the center of the debate is how city government can safeguard much-needed affordable housing without trampling on the rights of mobile home park landowners who wish to get out of  business and sell their land.

After a long and at times contentious meeting Tuesday night, the City Council voted unanimously to affirm the city's commitment to preserving San Jose's 59 mobile home parks for mostly senior and low-income residents. The City Council also voted to:

  •  Make City Council members decide whether to approve mobile home park zoning conversions, which observers say could bring more transparency and accountability to the process. Before, the city planning commission had that power.
  • Adopt new guidelines aimed at ensuring that if residents are displaced from mobile home parks, they get a fair shake in relocation money and the sale price of their mobile homes.
  • Direct planning staff to come back with a proposal for extending the city's six-month moratorium on mobile home park zoning conversions to other land uses.

"This is our city and it is our responsibility to protect what I believe is an asset," said City Councilman Ash Kalra after hours of public comment, mostly from dozens of worried mobile home residents. "As we heard from so many residents, these are people's homes."

Sponsored

Current Moratorium Expires Thursday

The city's actions come as the current moratorium on mobile home park conversions in San Jose is set to expire Thursday. The council implemented that temporary moratorium after residents of the Winchester Ranch Mobile Home Park in west San Jose learned the landowners planned to sell the 16-acre park to PulteGroup, a developer. Plans for new developments include a hotel and high-density residential project.

Winchester Ranch is within walking distance of the rapidly growing Santana Row, with trendy shops and hotels.

If those plans go through, roughly 140 seniors, including Ruth Greathouse, could lose their current home. Greathouse, 71, urged City Council members to adopt greater tenant protections for mobile park residents.

"Mobile home parks are not really parks. They are communities. Each one diverse and separate and real and close," said Greathouse, president of the park's homeowners association. "We cannot destroy those communities in San Jose. We need to protect and preserve them."

Other mobile home park residents who spoke at the meeting fear that if Winchester Ranch goes, their parks could close as well.

'Please Save Our Homes'

"Please save our homes," said Sonia Rivera, a mother of two who lives at Mobilehome Manor & R V Park and said she can't afford rental prices elsewhere. If the council doesn't act, she said, "we are going to be the next homeless living under a bridge."

Winchester Ranch co-owner Lee Arioto said he cares about residents and is trying to do what's best for his family. He spoke about his plans to offer current residents the chance to live in new apartments on-site, for a comparable rent to what they are paying now for land.

He added that the current moratorium hinders his family's ability to purchase mobile homes from at least 10 residents interested in selling ahead of the potential sale.

"We don’t want to be in business any longer. We’d like to convert it, take care of our residents ... in a nice,  brand-new community," said Arioto. "That means no water heaters break down, no furnaces break down. We are offering that. If that doesn’t work, we are closing the park."

The meeting featured lengthy soul-searching from City Council members, with many recognizing the difficulty in balancing affordable housing and a landowner's rights.

But Councilman Raul Peralez said the council has denied landowners plenty of times "the right to do something with their property."

"We do that with our zoning and our planning, and sometimes those owners are extremely frustrated, but we have that ability to vet those (applications) here," he said.

Council members debated whether the city could perhaps reserve mobile home parks solely for that use, limiting landowner options if they wanted to sell.

Councilman Johnny Khamis, citing his previous job in the financial sector, disagreed that investors would be lining up to buy mobile home parks with limits on space rents.

"However, I do think that all of you have a right to make sure that you are not cheated out of anything. So, it is a fine bridge here, but I just want to base this discussion on reality. We cannot ask people to keep their property forever for one use," Khamis said.

Tuesday night's City Council vote was a step in the right direction, said Diane Castillo, an attorney for the Law  Foundation of Silicon Valley. She said she hopes other cities in the region struggling with  the lack of affordable housing are paying attention.

"This is affordable ownership housing, and other communities should strive to preserve this type of housing as well," she said. 

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why California Environmentalists Are Divided Over Plan to Change Power Utility RatesWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Allegations of Prosecutorial Bias Spark Review of Death Penalty Convictions in Alameda CountyNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSF Democratic Party’s Support of Unlimited Housing Could Pressure Mayoral Candidates‘Sweeps Kill’: Bay Area Homeless Advocates Weigh in on Pivotal US Supreme Court CaseBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to KnowSupreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Major Homelessness CaseCalifornia’s Future Educators Divided on How to Teach Reading