upper waypoint

More Questions Emerge About Seismic Safety of Bay Bridge's Eastern Span

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The suspension tower for the Bay Bridge's new eastern span.  (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

State officials approved $4 million this week to further test steel rods at the base of the tower of the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge. That news came after reports that a steel rod had failed a key integrity test, leading to fears that corrosion from salt water may compromise the seismic integrity of the bridge.

"There's fundamental issues now related to the integrity of the foundation that holds the tower," said Jaxon Van Derbeken, a reporter with the San Francisco Chronicle, in a conversation Thursday on KQED's Forum.

The tower's high-strength rods, encased in protective sleeves, were exposed to pooled water due to a failed sealing job, but a looming question is where it's coming from. Van Derbeken cited very high levels of chloride, which he called a "telltale" sign of salt water, and suggests the water is not collected rain or left over from cleaning.

"If the water is intruding  in an ongoing way -- and we don't know that for certain -- but if it is, that's a much bigger problem to grapple with," said Steve Heminger, executive director of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Heminger is concerned about the ongoing presence of water, or more specifically, hydrogen, because it is one of the three factors that can play into a condition called "hydrogen embrittlement," which led to steel rods breaking on the bridge's  eastern span in 2013.

Sponsored

According to Heminger, hyrdogen embrittlement arises when three things occur simultaneously: susceptible material, the presence of hyrdogen and when the steel in question is under high tension.

"The good news is the tower foundation rods are under lower tension than the rods at the east pier,' said Heminger. "But look, it takes three strikes for this problem to happen, and you don't want to be in the batter's box with two strikes for 150 years."

Brian Maroney, a chief bridge engineer with Caltrans, said it's premature to draw any conclusions about the water found in the tower.

"I find it interesting that people are only talking about a few samples," said Maroney.  "And it's not clear what the history of those samples are. And they're only talking about chlorides. It's not that simple. You have to think about chlorides and bromides. You have to think about other telltale signature chemical elements. For example, we actually found fluoride in this water. Well, you don't find fluoride in the Pacific Ocean."

Maroney said that a team from a materials specialist company has been called in to ensure "a thorough sampling program" and analysis.

Maroney did acknowledge that there are some areas where water can enter the bridge, but said that is not surprising, given that the project is being completed in stages.

"You have to remember, construction's not done," said Maroney. "We're still working on this structure, on both sides."

At one point during the Forum show, host Michael Krasny asked all three guests just how safe the bridge is.

"If you have to be on a bridge in an earthquake, this is the bridge you want to be on,' said Maroney, citing his experience retrofitting structures throughout California.

"I think the bridge is perfectly safe for everyday use," said Heminger. "And I would trust Brian Maroney with my life, and I think all the rest of us should do the same. The bridge is fine. The issue is what happens in a major earthquake."

But Van Derbeken was not so confident. He said that people who have reviewed the bridge's record and decisions about the bridge question whether it is safe.

"Everywhere we look in the span there seems to be stuff that was compromised in some way, or decisions were made to borrow into safety margins, or things that normally are sacrosanct had to be, for whatever reasons, borrowed to get the job done," said Van Derbeken.

He said people who have voiced concerns to Caltrans have been dismissed and have been essentially told: "Go away. We understand where you're coming from, but we're satisfied."

Although Heminger said he is satisfied with the everyday safety of the bridge, he spoke for many when he expressed frustration with the ongoing saga of the eastern span:

"I do think it's maddening that we're talking about these bolts almost two years after we opened this bridge to traffic."

You can listen to the complete Forum conversation, including comments from Steve Heminger about holding people accountable, here:

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Cecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94State Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some WorkersAllegations of Prosecutorial Bias Spark Review of Death Penalty Convictions in Alameda CountyWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSF Democratic Party’s Support of Unlimited Housing Could Pressure Mayoral Candidates‘Sweeps Kill’: Bay Area Homeless Advocates Weigh in on Pivotal US Supreme Court CaseSupreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Major Homelessness CaseBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to KnowCalifornia’s Future Educators Divided on How to Teach Reading