upper waypoint

Californians Are Using Less Water, But More Restrictions Likely

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The lawn in front of the California State Capitol was left to die last summer.  (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

December's rains enabled Californians to finally meet Gov. Jerry Brown's call for a 20 percent reduction in monthly water consumption, but more restrictions loom as the state adapts to long-term drought conditions.

California is by no means out of trouble, despite a survey released Tuesday that showed an unusually rainy month helped residents cut water use by 22 percent statewide from December 2013 levels.

Per capita water use has been cut in half in the last six months, with Californians using an average of 67 gallons a day per person in December, compared with 140 gallons per person in June.

"California is doing its part to save our water, but the drought is far from over," Brown said in a statement Tuesday, declining through a spokesman to comment in more detail. "Careful stewardship and conservation must be our way of life."

Sponsored

San Francisco ranked near the lowest usage rates among California cities in December, at 40 gallons per person per day.

The closest that residents previously came to reaching the 20 percent reduction goal was in August, when water use dropped 11.6 percent.

Despite Conservation Wins, More Cuts Coming

The Sierra Nevada snowpack that supplies a third of California's water is 75 percent below its historical average. And for the first time in recorded history, there was no measurable rainfall in downtown San Francisco in January, when winter rains usually come.

Other ideas now being considered by the state water board include mandatory reviews of city water systems for leaks and penalizing agencies that haven't discouraged water-wasting by their customers.

A state drought-busting campaign declaring "Brown is the New Green" encourages people to let their lawns die. But outdoor watering makes up just a tenth of California's water use; three-quarters of it goes to agriculture, and yet state officials haven't campaigned in the same way against water-intensive almond orchards and rice fields.

"Homeowners should do their part, but the focus has been way too much on residents," said Maria Gutzeit, a member of a water district board in the Santa Clarita area. "You ask anyone here how they are going to sell a house with dead grass and dead bushes, and you'll bankrupt people for something that doesn't even significantly help the statewide water portfolio."

Other critics say the state should push even harder to reduce residential consumption, adopting the kinds of tougher measures already imposed in communities that save the most water, such as tiered pricing to make heavy users pay more, and even rationing of the water people use indoors.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Alameda: The Island That Almost Wasn’tFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailJust Days Left to Apply for California Program That Helps Pay for Your First HouseIn Fresno’s Chinatown, High-Speed Rail Sparks Hope and Debate Within ResidentsRainn Wilson from ‘The Office’ on Why We Need a Spiritual RevolutionCalifornia Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesWill Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?Silicon Valley House Seat Race Gets a RecountWorried About Data Brokers in California? Here’s How to Protect Yourself OnlineCalifornia Lawmakers Advance Proposal to Offer Unemployment Insurance to Striking Workers