upper waypoint

San Francisco to Explore Boosting Late-Night Transit Options

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Getting home on public transit in the wee hours after work or a night out on the town can be a challenge in San Francisco, especially if you live outside the city. Bay Area residents have long complained about the lack of 24-hour BART service, and the Muni Owl buses that are available aren't frequent enough, sometimes leaving riders waiting up to an hour in the middle of the night.

As a regular Muni rider, Supervisor Scott Wiener has been frustrated by the dearth of late-night transit options, and is hoping to finally address the concerns. Last week he introduced a resolution that calls for the formation of a working group made up of business owners, nightlife advocates, unions, workers and transit agencies. The goal: a "Late-Night Integrated Transportation Plan."

"It seems like portions of our transportation system assume that we do actually shut down as a city," Wiener said at a recent public hearing. "We make it really hard for these workers, and also for patrons coming into San Francisco, or getting around San Francisco, to either enjoy our nightlife or earn a living."

The city's economist has estimated that San Francisco's 3,200 nighttime businesses — including restaurants, bars and entertainment venues — contribute an estimated $4.2 billion annually to the city's economy, employing more than 50,000 workers in mostly middle-class jobs. These businesses host more than 80 million customers a year.

Muni riders push for better late night transit options. (Thomas Hawk)
Muni riders push for better late-night transit options. (Thomas Hawk/Flickr)

Many workers can't afford a car or don't want one, nor can they afford to commute by taxi or other ride services, so they rely on public transit, Wiener said. "Yet for a lot of these workers we're effectively forcing them to own a car and to commute in because we're not giving them decent late-night options."

Sponsored

At a hearing before the city's Land Use and Economic Development Committee earlier this month, some restaurant and bar owners said their employees, who often leave work in the early-morning hours with the cash tips they earned, don't feel safe waiting for late buses. Many live in the East Bay or South Bay because they can't afford San Francisco rent.

"Increasing late-night transportation is really a critical public safety issue for workers and for customers in San Francisco," said Tom Temprano of Virgil's Sea Room in the Mission.

John Haley, director of transit for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, admitted that Muni's Owl service is "uneven" and there is less of a focus on overnight on-time performance. That's because operators will sometimes wait for regular riders, or buses will get stalled waiting for connections with regional buses like AC Transit.

"We want to make sure that people have a way, and that we don't leave them stranded," Haley said.

Muni's Owl network currently serves 10 lines from 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. Buses are supposed to arrive every 30 minutes, but that can sometimes turn into 45 minutes or even an hour. Haley said the SFMTA is currently looking into increasing overnight bus service along the N-Owl and L-Owl lines by providing a shuttle between Embarcadero and West Portal. It's also considering more overnight bus service along Market Street, including extending the hours of the F-Line.

Operating light-rail service at night would be difficult, Haley said, because, like BART, Muni needs that down time to do maintenance. But at Wiener's request he agreed to prepare a report exploring the possibilities.

At the same hearing, a BART official repeated what the agency has stated many times over the years: It cannot do overnight service because it needs that critical window to do maintenance on an aging system.

"The system was never built for 24-hour service," said Jay Bolcik, BART's schedule and service planning manager. "Decisions made 50 years ago are the frustrating consequences that I have to deal with as a service planner in terms of trying to deliver the best possible service."

Bolcik said the overnight bus options that are available via AC Transit are "under-utilized." A survey of Polk Street patrons by the SFMTA one night last year confirmed that many were not aware of late night-transit options. Thirty-seven percent were unaware of Muni and transbay overnight service. Twenty percent said they were aware of it, but didn't know where the services ran. Transportation officials at the hearing agreed that transit agencies could do a better job getting the word out.

Riders looking to get back to the East Bay overnight have to rely on AC Transit's 800 bus. BART and AC Transit officials are considering an $800,000 pilot plan to add buses and increase service on Friday and Saturday nights, including extending the 800 line to the Mission District. The earliest that could happen is December. Riders looking to get to the Peninsula or South Bay have scarcer options, but SamTrans' 397 bus runs once an hour.

One challenge to boosting overnight service is funding, but Thea Selby of the San Francisco Transit Riders Union suggests an increase in late-night Muni service could come from raising the vehicle license fee.

"Better service doesn't grow on trees. Late-night transit needs to come from increased revenue, not decreased service," Selby said. "The vehicle license fee, which the Mayor's Transportation Task Force voted to support on the ballot this November, could partially go towards that service. That could be where the funds come from without losing service elsewhere."

Wiener said he hopes the working group will come up with some short- and mid-term recommendations that would be "low cost or even no cost," along with some more visionary goals.

"We've never studied late-night transportation in a meaningful way before," Wiener said. "When transit agencies look to the future, we want them to have that policy tool, a comprehensive plan with recommendations, that they can look to."

The group is expected to report to the Board of Supervisors on its progress in six months.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Stunning Archival Photos of the 1906 Earthquake and FireWhy Nearly 50 California Hospitals Were Forced to End Maternity Ward ServicesSan Francisco Sues Oakland Over Plan to Change Airport NameDemocrats Again Vote Down California Ban on Unhoused EncampmentsFederal Bureau of Prisons Challenges Judge’s Order Delaying Inmate Transfers from FCI DublinFirst Trump Criminal Trial Underway in New YorkCould Protesters Who Shut Down Golden Gate Bridge Be Charged With False Imprisonment?Jail Deaths Prompt Calls To Separate Coroner And Sheriff's Departments In Riverside CountyDespite Progress, Black Californians Still Face Major Challenges In Closing Equality GapThe Beauty in Finding ‘Other People’s Words’ in Your Own