San Francisco to Explore Boosting Late-Night Transit Options

Getting home on public transit in the wee hours after work or a night out on the town can be a challenge in San Francisco, especially if you live outside the city. Bay Area residents have long complained about the lack of 24-hour BART service, and the Muni Owl buses that are available aren’t frequent enough, sometimes leaving riders waiting up to an hour in the middle of the night.

As a regular Muni rider, Supervisor Scott Wiener has been frustrated by the dearth of late-night transit options, and is hoping to finally address the concerns. Last week he introduced a resolution that calls for the formation of a working group made up of business owners, nightlife advocates, unions, workers and transit agencies. The goal: a “Late-Night Integrated Transportation Plan.”

“It seems like portions of our transportation system assume that we do actually shut down as a city,” Wiener said at a recent public hearing. “We make it really hard for these workers, and also for patrons coming into San Francisco, or getting around San Francisco, to either enjoy our nightlife or earn a living.”

The city’s economist has estimated that San Francisco’s 3,200 nighttime businesses — including restaurants, bars and entertainment venues — contribute an estimated $4.2 billion annually to the city’s economy, employing more than 50,000 workers in mostly middle-class jobs. These businesses host more than 80 million customers a year.

Muni riders push for better late night transit options. (Thomas Hawk)
Muni riders push for better late-night transit options. (Thomas Hawk/Flickr)

Many workers can’t afford a car or don’t want one, nor can they afford to commute by taxi or other ride services, so they rely on public transit, Wiener said. “Yet for a lot of these workers we’re effectively forcing them to own a car and to commute in because we’re not giving them decent late-night options.”

At a hearing before the city’s Land Use and Economic Development Committee earlier this month, some restaurant and bar owners said their employees, who often leave work in the early-morning hours with the cash tips they earned, don’t feel safe waiting for late buses. Many live in the East Bay or South Bay because they can’t afford San Francisco rent.

“Increasing late-night transportation is really a critical public safety issue for workers and for customers in San Francisco,” said Tom Temprano of Virgil’s Sea Room in the Mission.

John Haley, director of transit for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, admitted that Muni’s Owl service is “uneven” and there is less of a focus on overnight on-time performance. That’s because operators will sometimes wait for regular riders, or buses will get stalled waiting for connections with regional buses like AC Transit.

“We want to make sure that people have a way, and that we don’t leave them stranded,” Haley said.

Muni’s Owl network currently serves 10 lines from 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. Buses are supposed to arrive every 30 minutes, but that can sometimes turn into 45 minutes or even an hour. Haley said the SFMTA is currently looking into increasing overnight bus service along the N-Owl and L-Owl lines by providing a shuttle between Embarcadero and West Portal. It’s also considering more overnight bus service along Market Street, including extending the hours of the F-Line.

Operating light-rail service at night would be difficult, Haley said, because, like BART, Muni needs that down time to do maintenance. But at Wiener’s request he agreed to prepare a report exploring the possibilities.

At the same hearing, a BART official repeated what the agency has stated many times over the years: It cannot do overnight service because it needs that critical window to do maintenance on an aging system.

“The system was never built for 24-hour service,” said Jay Bolcik, BART’s schedule and service planning manager. “Decisions made 50 years ago are the frustrating consequences that I have to deal with as a service planner in terms of trying to deliver the best possible service.”

Bolcik said the overnight bus options that are available via AC Transit are “under-utilized.” A survey of Polk Street patrons by the SFMTA one night last year confirmed that many were not aware of late night-transit options. Thirty-seven percent were unaware of Muni and transbay overnight service. Twenty percent said they were aware of it, but didn’t know where the services ran. Transportation officials at the hearing agreed that transit agencies could do a better job getting the word out.

Riders looking to get back to the East Bay overnight have to rely on AC Transit’s 800 bus. BART and AC Transit officials are considering an $800,000 pilot plan to add buses and increase service on Friday and Saturday nights, including extending the 800 line to the Mission District. The earliest that could happen is December. Riders looking to get to the Peninsula or South Bay have scarcer options, but SamTrans’ 397 bus runs once an hour.

One challenge to boosting overnight service is funding, but Thea Selby of the San Francisco Transit Riders Union suggests an increase in late-night Muni service could come from raising the vehicle license fee.

“Better service doesn’t grow on trees. Late-night transit needs to come from increased revenue, not decreased service,” Selby said. “The vehicle license fee, which the Mayor’s Transportation Task Force voted to support on the ballot this November, could partially go towards that service. That could be where the funds come from without losing service elsewhere.”

Wiener said he hopes the working group will come up with some short- and mid-term recommendations that would be “low cost or even no cost,” along with some more visionary goals.

“We’ve never studied late-night transportation in a meaningful way before,” Wiener said. “When transit agencies look to the future, we want them to have that policy tool, a comprehensive plan with recommendations, that they can look to.”

The group is expected to report to the Board of Supervisors on its progress in six months.

Related

  • Tony

    The buses in their current state wouldn’t be a very useful option even with increased frequency. For example, the 397 bus from SF to Palo Alto takes nearly two and a half hours since it runs local the entire way. The city really needed a better option.

    • http://twitter.com/jimbolandjots jimbolandjots

      More frequent buses are possible with bus-only lanes, which SFMTA is apparently moving to implement on Van Ness and other major corridors.

      • Guest

        The bus lanes and BRT concepts look great, and will do a lot of good for travel within the city. However, I think the issue with

      • Tony

        Bus lanes and BRT look like great options for transit within the city, and will do a lot of good. However, for late night transit I think the solution might be much cheaper. Most of the peninsula can be reached by local transit options via Millbrae or Palo Alto, but as it currently stands it takes 1.5 and 2.5 hours to reach each hub by bus from SF after hours. If there was simply an express bus that ran on the highway (which would be traffic free at that hour) the local transit options for each region could solve the rest.

        • http://twitter.com/jimbolandjots jimbolandjots

          Great idea!

  • kc

    “The system was never built for 24-hour service,” said Jay Bolcik,
    BART’s schedule and service planning manager. “Decisions made 50 years
    ago are the frustrating consequences that I have to deal with as a
    service planner in terms of trying to deliver the best possible
    service.”

    We just hear this sort of stuff too often. I’m sure it’s true, which is why I’m always aggravated to see BART focus on expansion instead of figuring out some way to overhaul the system first so that we can, say, run a 24-hour system, or simply have higher throghput during commute hours. The more they expand, the costlier it’ll be to do this kind overhaul when we finally reach the breaking point and find we *have* to do it.

    • david vartanoff

      The BART shiboleth about overnight service is disproved every night on 2 routes in Chicago and multiple routes in New York. There are enough crossovers in the system to SAFELY single track around maintenance workers while still providing minimal service–30 minute headways for instance. While waiting half an hour may seem long, BART is so much faster than the All Nighter buses that the wait indoors would be worth it. And, yes, you are right, expansion given the current state of service is a bad plan.

      • thomas Jr.

        Agreeing with you but want to say that it’s not just multiple routes in NYC, it’s pretty much EVERY route that runs 24-hours.

  • Ren

    I don’t know whether this is still true or not, but back when I used to work until about 1 or 2am in the Mission District, one colleague of mine was frequently able to DRIVE herself home to Davis faster than another colleague was able to RIDE Muni home to the Outer Sunset. Unless he happened to time it perfectly, with no 10- or 20- or 40-minute waits transferring from one bus to another, which was completely beyond his control, it took him a couple of hours vs. her, about an hour and a half.

  • Myles Garcia

    Instead of running BART 24 hours, how about 2 or 3 rounds of late night express buses to Peninsula, South an East Bay BART lots where these workers can be dropped off at the BART stations? Just have local police / BART Security and ticket clerks stay later until the last SF workers have been dropped off? And hire bus drivers who live at the end of the line. All the workers can look out for each other.

  • Xn0r

    I’d be happy if BART just had one or two more hours of service. That’d be in the “butter zone” for folks going to concerts and such at clubs in the city. Many of them wrap up by about 23:30, which is just about enough time to rush to a muni bus to get to a BART station (and wait 20 minutes for the last train). But many concerts also run past the “drop dead” time for me to leave of about 23:45, and I have to leave early. I’ve had to do this many times, or get stuck taking the OWL muni/AC transit buses back to Fremont BART which takes a full three plus hours to get there (04:00 ish arrival).

    If the last BART to the east bay and peninsula left in the window of 01:00 – 01:30 instead of 00:00 – 00:30, I wouldn’t have to leave concerts early, and may be able to stick around for a bit and get a bite to eat in the city instead of rushing to BART and grabbing a snack back in the South Bay like I always wind up doing.

  • Jame

    The other problem is, let’s pretend BART runs later. The late night buses, the 800, the 851 etc don’t really cover much ground, so how do you handle the last mile from BART? Most BART stations no longer have cab stands, and the cabs would be long gone.

  • Larmot

    There is no reason why BART cannot run trains until 2am on Fridays and Saturdays (at least). LA’s Metro even does that…so does Boston and DC.

  • Northbay latenights

    I really hope this plan includes late night ferry service to larkspur thurs-Saturday!!!!

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor