Protesters surround a Google bus at 24th and Valencia streets Monday in protest aimed at evictions and displacement in San Francisco's Mission District. (Steve Rhodes)
Protesters surround a Google bus at 24th and Valencia streets Monday in a protest aimed at evictions and displacement in San Francisco’s Mission District. (Steve Rhodes)

Read: “Resisting Monoculture” by Rebecca Solnit in Guernica.

San Francisco author Rebecca Solnit has got a thing or two to say on a wide array of subjects, from pioneering photographer Edward Muybridge to the history of walking to the landscape, politics and culture of the West, particularly her longtime hometown of San Francisco.

Last year, she wrote an essay for the London Review of Books on the meaning of San Francisco’s rapidly proliferating fleet of technology shuttle buses. I think lots of people were noticing the big white motor coaches swooping into Muni bus zones around the city to carry workers to Apple, Google, Facebook and other Silicon Valley corporate campuses. But Solnit’s piece was a sort of declaration that the buses are a key part of the engine remaking the city in a particularly unfriendly way for anyone not employed with the technology industry or engaged in some other lucrative enterprise. “Most of them are gleaming white,” she wrote in opening the essay, “with dark-tinted windows, like limousines, and some days I think of them as the spaceships on which our alien overlords have landed to rule over us.”

Anyway, here we are in 2014, and the buses have become targets of protests by activists fighting the sharp increase in rents and evictions in the city. The buses have also drawn their defenders, who argue mainly they cut the number of private cars crowding the roads from the city to Silicon Valley. Among those speaking up on behalf of the buses is Ben Adler, a writer for the environmental news site Grist, who took Solnit and other bus critics to task for ignoring the buses’ claimed benefits:

Solnit’s complaint that Google thinks its employees are too important to “drive themselves” is backward and nonsensical. Driving in one’s own private car is far more elitist than sharing a bus with one’s coworkers. It is also vastly worse for the environment. The buses take cars off the road. Fewer cars mean less traffic, and less idling in traffic, which is especially polluting.

Now Solnit is back with another broadside that takes aim at Adler and Grist, questions the environmental claims made for the buses and broadens her critique of the tech sector’s impact on the city. Her new essay, “Resisting Monoculture,” was published Tuesday by online culture journal Guernica. She says in part:

I’m seeing the town that gave birth to the Sierra Club and Rainforest Action Network and seminal movements for human rights, a town that produced great insurrection and antiwar activism and idealism and new social ideas, become a place where you can’t afford to live unless you’re doing something incredibly lucrative and time-consuming — and probably involving technology corporations. A young human rights activist is not so likely to be able to afford to live here, or a nurse’s aide, or a baker, and so the biodiversity of the city is being laid waste, and in its place springs up a monocrop of technology workers. If this continues, the contributions San Francisco has given the world will not be given any more.

People who like green transit need to consider that when a place becomes the economic equivalent of a luxury resort, the urban equivalent of Jackson Hole, the laborers who really keep the place running — the people who clean and cook and drive and build and care for the old, the young, the frail — need to come in from far away. And no luxury coaches come to fetch the home healthcare worker from Richmond or the construction worker from Tracy. It’s unhealthy when firefighters and teachers can’t afford to live in the community they care for, and San Francisco was already tough that way: it’s now, thanks to the Silicon Valley incursion, getting a lot worse.

Good Read: Rebecca Solnit vs. the Tech Buses, Round 2 8 January,2014Dan Brekke

  • AJ

    Sigh. If you live here, you are part of the problem. No way around it. The folks who can afford $5k a month displace the folks who can only pay $3k. The $3k displace those who can only afford $2k who displaced those who can only afford $1k, who displaced those who can only afford $800, who displaced those who can only afford $500.

    And now that you get to live in such a fabulous place as SF $&@% anyone else who wants to move in now. It’s classic “I’ve got mine, to Hades with you” attitude. I’d love to see a list of just who the protestors deem worthy enough to move into the city, how many of them are allowed, and where they are allowed to live.

  • RD

    If you want things like organic produce farmer’s markets, and the best welfare in the country, you need a tax base willing to pay for it. Feel free to push out all the tech firms, but don’t be surprised when SF turns into Detroit. Those same tech yuppies people are always harping about are helping pay for those ‘starving’ bakers to be able to make pop up shops that charge $5 for a cronut.

    Solnit has yet to offer an idea of how to get tech workers who live in SF to their jobs. If her solution is that they should live where they work, then she should say goodbye to those tax dollars paying CalPers pension plans. BART and MUNI are already overloaded and would be incapable of handling the influx of new passengers.

  • Eamonn

    Still scapegoating the buses? If you’re rent’s too expensive, take it up with the people who are blocking every high rise development at every turn and preventing the city from meeting the demand for housing. Oh that’s right, it’s your own people who are blocking that progress because you don’t want “your” precious view of the bay obstructed by these inconvenient bridge-and-tunnel types.

    • Guest

      Bridge and Tunnel? Ah, an East Coast transplant to the left coast. Some rethinking is required

  • RW

    I see a lot of coverage on the side of the antagonists and in favor of corrosive identity politics. But where are the counterpoints that add necessary context to the real host of issues surrounding displacement in the region? Seems the media in ignoring this context is just as complicit in assuring this situation continues.

    Real solutions require real understanding:



Dan Brekke

Dan Brekke is a blogger, reporter and editor for KQED News, responsible for online breaking news coverage of topics ranging from California water issues to the Bay Area's transportation challenges. In a newsroom career that began in Chicago in 1972, Dan has worked as a city and foreign/national editor for The San Francisco Examiner, editor at Wired News, deputy editor at Wired magazine, managing editor at TechTV as well as for several Web startups.

Since joining KQED in 2007, Dan has reported, edited and produced both radio and online features and breaking news pieces. He has shared in two Society of Professional Journalists Norcal Excellence in Journalism awards — for his 2012 reporting on a KQED Science series on water and power in California, and in 2014, for KQED's comprehensive reporting on the south Napa earthquake.

In addition to his 44 years of on-the-job education, Dan is a lifelong student of history and is still pursuing an undergraduate degree.

Email Dan at:


Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor