Herbert Olivares (left) and Mohammed Sam are among a group of independent truckers who tried to shut down the Port Of Oaklandon Monday  over low pay and long waits. (Cy Musiker/KQED News).
Herbert Olivares (left) and Mohammed Sam are among a group of independent truckers who tried to shut down the Port Of Oakland on Monday over low pay and long waits. (Cy Musiker/KQED News).

Independent truck drivers are staging a protest at the Port of Oakland this morning to bring attention to poor working conditions, including being forced to wait for most of the work day to drop off or pick up cargo.

This morning’s action shut down SSA Marine’s Oakland International Container Terminal, a facility that includes five berths and 10 cranes. KQED’s Cy Musiker reports that terminal is closed, as it was during an August strike by the independent truckers, because members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union refused to cross picket lines. The overall impact on the port operations isn’t clear, though Port of Oakland officials estimate the impact of the two-day August strike was in the millions of dollars.

Members of the Port of Oakland Trucker Association, who can’t unionize, say that since they’re paid on a per-delivery basis, long delays at the port cost them money. They want the port’s terminal operators and shipping companies to pay them for their time. They also want the port and shippers to help pay for retrofitting their trucks to comply with new air-pollution standards.

They laid out their position in a statement Sunday:

In ten years, the pay per cargo load has not increased, while the cost of diesel has more than quadrupled, and costs for truck maintenance have skyrocketed. Despite the long list of grievances the truckers have, which include unsafe working conditions, verbal abuse from terminal employees, a single men’s restroom for all truckers to use, and daily hours of unpaid time spent waiting for a load, they are only asking for three things from the Port of Oakland and terminal owners. POTA’s demands are simple: a Green Emissions Fee, $50 paid to truckers monthly to offset the cost of upgrading trucks to new green emissions standards, an extension for compliance with new environmental standards that will go into effect for owner-operators on January 1, 2014, and a Congestion Fee paid to compensate truckers for hours, currently unpaid, spent waiting for a cargo load, and an increase in pay per cargo load.

Driver Herbert Olivares stood at the gate to Terminal 60 at dawn this morning, and explained what happened last Friday while waiting to drop off an empty container. “I started the line here around 11:50 a.m., and I didn’t get out of the terminal until 4:30 in the afternoon,” Olivares said. “Just one box. I didn’t get paid for the waiting time.”

Truckers also want better access to port restrooms while they wait. One trucker, Mohammed Sam, told Musiker that “we have to pee in bottles because we’re not allowed to leave our trucks.” Sams says the port suspends drivers who violate that rule, which has been imposed as a security measure.

Port Director Chris Lytle has convened seven meetings between truckers, shipping terminal operators, and longshore workers, and has said he’s sympathetic to the trucker’s concerns.

The terminal operators and shipping companies say they’re working to shorten wait times, but they’ve resisted paying truckers for their wait times.

This post is based on reporting by KQED’s Cy Musiker.

  • Don_in_Odessa

    Really is too bad about the last truckers strike.. Originally supposed to be that the truckers would just not haul for three days. Somehow it got whipped up into a truckers to DC thing. At around a $1000 to fuel the typical big rig getting 8-10 miles to gallon, I don’t know many truckers that could afford the fuel to DC and then drive around the Beltway for three days on top of that.

    Need to try this again without the internet radio hosts and blogger grandstanders. Just stop hauling for a given amount of time and keep repeating it, each time a little longer until the water bags in Washington get the message.


Dan Brekke

Dan Brekke is a blogger, reporter and editor for KQED News, responsible for online breaking news coverage of topics ranging from California water issues to the Bay Area's transportation challenges. In a newsroom career that began in Chicago in 1972, Dan has worked as a city and foreign/national editor for The San Francisco Examiner, editor at Wired News, deputy editor at Wired magazine, managing editor at TechTV as well as for several Web startups.

Since joining KQED in 2007, Dan has reported, edited and produced both radio and online features and breaking news pieces. He has shared in two Society of Professional Journalists Norcal Excellence in Journalism awards — for his 2012 reporting on a KQED Science series on water and power in California, and in 2014, for KQED's comprehensive reporting on the south Napa earthquake.

In addition to his 44 years of on-the-job education, Dan is a lifelong student of history and is still pursuing an undergraduate degree.

Email Dan at: dbrekke@kqed.org

Twitter: twitter.com/danbrekke
Facebook: www.facebook.com/danbrekke
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/danbrekke

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor