A 1948 San Francisco Planning Department map proposes 10 freeways to crisscross the city. (Eric Fischer/Flickr)
A 1948 San Francisco Planning Department map proposes 10 freeways to crisscross the city. (Eric Fischer/Flickr)

After World War II, San Francisco was just as tempted as other American cities to build a vast freeway system. In fact, a 1948 San Francisco Planning Department map that was adopted in 1951 shows the intention to build 10 freeways crisscrossing the city. The Bay Bridge would be connected to the Golden Gate Bridge via the Embarcadero Freeway, and freeways would extend all the way into the Richmond and Sunset neighborhoods. If the city had built all the freeways on this map, Mission Street would be a freeway!

So, what happened?

The Bayshore (101) and Southern (280) freeways were completed without much fuss and still serve the city well today. But San Francisco residents started organizing against the rest of the planned highways that were to reach north of Market Street and into their backyards.

In 1959, the anti-freeway movement came to a head in what has been called the Freeway Revolt, when neighborhood groups presented the Board of Supervisors with a petition signed by 30,000 people asking to cancel seven of the 10 planned freeways, including the Embarcadero Freeway, for which construction already had begun. Construction workers had completed 1.2 miles of the Embarcadero Freeway before the work was halted. The unfinished roadway jutted out just past the Broadway exit.

That freeway became a political football for many more years, until the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 rendered it unsafe and it was torn down.

It’s always interesting to see what might have been and to wonder how San Francisco could ever have become the cohesive and walkable city it is today, had the 1948 traffic plan been completed.

Check out what might have been in other cities!

What Would San Francisco Have Looked Like Without the ‘Freeway Revolt’? 2 August,2013Katrina Schwartz

  • I wish Fort Worth and Dallas had followed that example!

    • wesh

      And we wish we had your negligible levels of commuter traffic!

      • Negligible? Have you driven here? It can take over an hour to go 20 miles!

        This area is a driver’s nightmare.

        • wesh

          No I have not, but that hardly sounds that bad. I’ve spent 1 hour going ten miles in DC, not even on a major highway, so that’s hardly a worst case scenario. the entire city of san francisco is maybe 9 miles long. Try driving from the southern end of the GG bridge to the entrance to 280 near the ballpark at rush hour. That’s the predicament that the fwy plan pictured above would have prevented, having to drive through surface streets to reach a fwy. 20mph would be a dream.

          • The thing is, my example is not a fluke. It’s day-in, day-out reality. There are times it can take two hours.

            I’m not trying to pit our area against others, just pointing out that commuting is no fun here, either. Especially in this 100+ heat.



Katrina Schwartz

Katrina Schwartz is a journalist based in San Francisco. She's worked at KPCC public radio in LA and has reported on air and online for KQED since 2010. She's a staff writer for KQED's education blog MindShift.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor