Sunday, June 30: BART Strike Deadline Update

By Alex Emslie and Peter Lollo

Bay Area residents are one step closer to a commuting nightmare as BART employees, represented by the transit agency’s two biggest unions, authorized a strike Tuesday night. The vote was nearly unanimous. If negotiations continue to stall, the system — which carries an average of 400,000 passengers a day — could shut down Monday.

Saul Almanza, BART track safety trainer and SEIU 1021 vice president of BART professional chapter, stands at a June 25 rally at 24th and Mission streets in San Francisco calling attention to safety issues the union says are plaguing the BART system.
Saul Almanza, BART track safety trainer and SEIU 1021 vice president of BART professional chapter, stands at a June 25 rally at 24th and Mission streets in San Francisco calling attention to safety issues the union says are plaguing the BART system.

The impasse is centered on worker and rider safety issues raised by Service Employees International Union 1021, representing maintenance workers and electricians, and Amalgamated Transit Union 1555, representing station agents and train operators.

BART track safety trainer Saul Almanza said inadequate lighting in the system’s tunnels puts workers and riders at risk. The unions also want more staffing early in the morning and late, as well as and bulletproof glass in station-agent booths.

Negotiations also have stalled over wages and employee pension and health care contributions.

“There has been some progress, very slow progress,” Almanza said. “But on the issues that really concern our members – safety, and, of course, benefits and pensions and wages – we’re nowhere near close to getting that resolved.”

BART officials have repeatedly called the safety issues raised by the unions a “smoke screen,” insisting contract negotiations are not the place to raise them. BART spokesman Rick Rice said the system can’t remain sustainable if employees continue to contribute nothing to pensions and pay a flat $92 per month for health care, regardless of the number of dependents. The gulf between each side’s suggested wage increases over the next four years is vast, with the unions initially proposing 23 percent and BART proposing 4 percent.

“Safety is not part of the negotiations,” Rice said. “The district’s budget for 2014 has $4.5 million in the budget for new lighting in the tunnels. And frankly, union leaders have a chance to meet weekly and monthly to discuss issues like that.”

Rice said BART officials were back at the negotiating table today despite the strike authorization vote.

“It does seem a little selfish to threaten to put the Bay Area in chaos for a 23 percent pay increase, no pension contribution and very limited benefit contributions,” he said.

The unions disagree and filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court Monday asking the court to force BART to negotiate on worker safety. BART called in a state mediator to try to break the deadlock.

If the contracts expire Sunday at midnight without a deal, union bargaining teams are now authorized to call a strike, and Bay Area commuters are nervous. Tom Radulovich, president of the BART board of directors, asked Gov. Jerry Brown not to impose a 60-day cooling-off period, which would shift a potential work stoppage into a busier season.

“Just as crucially, the issues of pension and health care contributions, salary increases and work rules should be settled now and not postponed,” Radulovich wrote to Brown yesterday. “An unnecessary delay of 60 days would only put off hard choices that will have to be made in order to reach an agreement.”

A BART shutdown may be disastrous, warn transit officials. The Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission is urging commuters to work from home or at least avoid rush hour, warning of “thousands more vehicles than usual” expected to clog streets and highways. The commission today approved $20 million in emergency funding to provide alternative transportation in the event of a BART strike. The money would come mostly from up to $18.7 million in state funding to BART that the MTC has the authority to redirect to other agencies if necessary, MTC executive director Steve Heminger said.

The commission will also be sending letters to employers in the region  encouraging them to work with employees to find alternatives to driving during peak commute hours, MTC officials said. Telecommuting will be encouraged, as well as carpooling or using  alternative transit services such as Alameda-Contra Costa Transit buses or ferries across the Bay.

BART provides about 400,000 rides daily, including 96,000 across the Bay in the Transbay Tube during peak commute hours, which is 50% more than when BART workers last held a strike in 1997, Heminger said.

Because of that, “the impact is likely to be even more  substantial,” Heminger said.

“The supplemental services … can in no way fully replace BART’s  capacity in the event of a work stoppage,” Heminger wrote in his request to the commission. “But these services can make a bad situation somewhat better  for a considerable number of travelers.”

In 2009, when BART workers voted to authorize a strike, contingency preparations were made before the strike was averted at the last minute.

“I think that there is a very legitimate fear that the city is going to be paralyzed,” San Francisco Supervisor David Campos said. “We rely heavily on the BART system. I am very worried about what it would mean for the city.” He said he was unaware of any city contingency plan should BART shut down.

Other transportation agencies are balking at trying to pick up BART’s slack. Members of ATU Local 192, representing AC Transit workers, also have authorized a strike for a contract set to expire Sunday.

ATU Local 192 President Yvonne Williams called absorbing BART’s 400,000 daily riders “probably impossible.”

“We carry close to 200,000 passengers a day,” she said. “We’re not equipped or able to absorb the additional 400,000 passengers a day, and we feel that would place our operators and the riding public in imminent danger.” Williams stopped short of saying AC Transit would strike if BART does.

Both sides in the BART negotiations are back at the bargaining table today. The unions have said they will give notice 72 hours before striking. Concerned commuters can sign up for strike alerts and learn more about BART’s position on the system’s website. SEIU 1021 and ATU 1555 also have information online.

Daly City resident Shenalya King, like many in the Bay Area, was distraught when she learned about the possible strike.

“I’m worried,” she said. “Do you know how long it’s going to take me to get home if they stop? I’ll get home about maybe 11 p.m., and then I have to walk up five hills. Come on!”

  • Bubu

    This strike is more about the class warfare that is going at BART more so than the money. BART management is inviting the strike. BART management walks away with lined pockets after each contract negotiation saying…”Suckers”! The Board, who are the public representatives are off in the wings. Go figure!

  • Lizzy

    If BART goes on strike, then I can’t go to work. Are the striking BART employees going to pay for my lost salary? No. An average BART employee makes over $70,000 and earn more with overtime, yet they want more money. Seriously!?! I make less than that and I have two college degrees (A.S. and B.A.). I contribute to my pension and health benefits, why can’t they. I agree with the safety issues but with the pay increase. There are millions of people who live paycheck to paycheck. There are millions more that are unemployed and trying to live on unemployment checks. I support the safety improvement for employees and riders, but not the 23% pay raise. 23%?!? Greedy, greedy, greedy. Some people don’t get raises or only get 3-5% cost of living increases per year. Yet they want 23%. I had a conversation with the station agent I see everyday and he couldn’t articulate why they need 23%. He kept trying to hide behind the safety issue. Safety issue is one thing, but pay increase is another. I have no sympathy for them at all. Get to work and be grateful you have a great paying job!

    • Rick James

      I think one of the obvious things people are missing here is that when BART says “The average salary of a BART employee is $75k”, they’re leaving out the fact that the low wage workers are striking against the high wage managers, whos wages are included in that calculation. If you have 5 ticket takers making 30k a year, and an executive making 450k/year, and those 5 workers go on strike against the executive’s decision and the executive says “but our employees make an average of 100k/yr!!!” I hope you see why this is disingenuous. Agree about health and pension benefits, but then again, if we had socialized medicine this wouldn’t be a problem either. But yeah, you’re right, skewer the lower class bart workers while allowing the upper class ones to get away with their lies and you can be a good little lemming like the rest of them.

  • njudah

    Fun Fact: if we had national health care, there’d be no strike because everyone would have health care, and BART would not have to pay for it like they do now. We’d end this false choice and everyone would be happy. In fact I asked the previous BART director during the last labor negotiations how much BART would have saved under a national health care plan and she said “we’d have no deficit.” Period.

    Ah but we can’t have that, can we! No instead we gotta do Romneycare! How’s that working out for y’all?

  • disgruntled rider

    I have no sympathy either. with the exception of a few workers, all I ever see are the employees standing around talking and ignoring patrons. Perhaps if I had been respected as a rider, I could side with the workers, but as Lizzy says, no sympathy.
    btw, this is the sentiment I hear most often from other conversations I have

  • no strike

    I think the safety issue is being used to get the public on their side. I hope that it is already safe

  • Manny

    Someone need to start a boycott bart movement. Let it go bankrupt and layoff employees. Maybe when they reorganize, they will be able to restructure the salary and identify only the position that have safety risks and that position deserve higher pay than those who are just sitting in the booth reading magazines and ignoring and being rude to riders who pay their salary.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor