upper waypoint

Monster Suing San Francisco Over Energy Drinks

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

NEW YORK (AP) — Monster Beverage is suing San Francisco’s city attorney over demands that the energy drink maker reduce the amount of caffeine in its drinks and change its marketing practices.

Monster Beverage says it is being unfairly singled out by San Francisco's city attorney. (Toban Black/Flickr)
Monster Beverage says it is being unfairly singled out by San Francisco’s city attorney. (Toban Black/Flickr)

The company, based in Corona (Riverside County), says it’s being unfairly singled out by City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who late last year had asked Monster to produce documentation showing that its drinks are safe. Since then, Monster says Herrera has asked it to reformulate its drinks and change its labels and marketing materials.

A representative for the city attorney’s office did not immediately return a call for comment.

The suit comes at a time when the energy drink industry has come under intense scrutiny. The Food and Drug Administration is investigating reports of deaths linked to energy drinks, although the agency has noted that the reports don’t prove the drinks caused the deaths.

New York’s attorney general has also subpoenaed Monster — as well as the maker of 5-Hour Energy shots and PepsiCo Inc., which makes Amp — as part of an investigation into how energy drinks are made and marketed. In addition, the family of a 14-year-old girl is suing Monster after they said she died after drinking two 24-ounce cans of Monster in a short period.

Sponsored

Monster has stood by the safety of its drinks. Earlier this year, the company hit back at the lawsuit and said there was no blood test performed to confirm that the girl died of caffeine toxicity.

In its lawsuit against San Francisco’s city attorney, Monster Beverage Corp. notes that “any child can walk into a Starbucks and buy an unlimited number” of 16-ounce brewed coffees, which Monster says have twice as much caffeine as its energy drinks.

The lawsuit cited a letter from Herrera dated March 29 asking Monster to provide “adequate warning labels” and to stop targeting minors in marketing materials.

Monster’s current label says drinkers should limit themselves to one can every four hours and a maximum of three per day. It also says the drink isn’t recommended for children, people sensitive to caffeine, pregnant women or women who are nursing.

The city attorney said in his letter that three cans amount to 480 milligrams of caffeine, nearly five times the recommended maximum for adolescents and above the 400 milligrams per day the FDA has indicated is safe for adults.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.

Even as soda consumption has flagged in recent years, energy drinks including Red Bull and Rockstar have surged in popularity. In 2011, sales volume for energy drinks rose by nearly 17 percent, according to Beverage Digest, an industry tracker.

How it began: ‘Monster’ Energy Drinks Under Investigation by FDA and SF City Attorney

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why Nearly 50 California Hospitals Were Forced to End Maternity Ward ServicesStunning Archival Photos of the 1906 Earthquake and FireDemocrats Again Vote Down California Ban on Unhoused EncampmentsFirst Trump Criminal Trial Underway in New YorkFederal Bureau of Prisons Challenges Judge’s Order Delaying Inmate Transfers from FCI DublinJail Deaths Prompt Calls To Separate Coroner And Sheriff's Departments In Riverside CountyRichmond Passes 45-Day Retail Moratorium on Tobacco to Deal With 'Excessive Smoke Shops'The Beauty in Finding ‘Other People’s Words’ in Your OwnAmid FAFSA Mistakes and Delays, Universities Struggle to Help StudentsSF’s Equity Program Fails to Address Racial Disparities in Cannabis Industry