Wow, the SF Weekly and Bay Guardian under one umrella? What’s next, Ross Mirkarimi and Ed Lee hug?

Voice Media Group announced that it’s sold the Weekly to the San Francisco Newspaper Company, which publishes both the Bay Guardian, San Francisco’s other alternative weekly, and The Examiner.

From Voice Media Group:

The deal, effective immediately, means that The San Francisco Newspaper Company will assume operations for the paper beginning today. The sale of SF Weekly will allow Voice Media Group to focus on growth opportunities for mobile and online platforms and to develop core digital offerings in its other key markets…

Financial details of the deal will not be disclosed.

The SF Appeal is reporting the following:

According to at least one SF Weekly staffer, the San Francisco Weekly will experience multiple layoffs as a result of the publication’s sale to the San Francisco Newspaper Company.

A deal involving the SF Newspaper Company and some other local asset had been rumored for a while. As the SF Appeal reported, initial speculation focused on the East Bay Express. Until the Express put an end to the rumor this way…

The SF Newspaper Company bought the Examiner from Clarity Media in 2011. Co-owner Todd Vogt took on the role of publisher and president.

The Guardian and Weekly have been at each other’s throats for years. In 2008, the Guardian won an antitrust suit against its rival, with a jury issuing a verdict that the Weekly had engaged in illegal predatory pricing with intent to harm the Guardian. The Guardian was awarded $21 million in that case; the two sides settled in 2011. During that period the Weekly published lots of material critical of both the verdict and the Guardian. Stuff like this:

The Guardian responded in kind (or maybe they started it, it’s hard to remember now…) Here’s one 2010 post by the publication’s Tim Redmond gloatingly titled “SF Weekly owes us half its ad revenue.”

There have been editorial differences, as well.

Anyway, that’s all over now. At least in terms of who signs the paychecks.

  • Martin Espinoza

    “The Guardian and Weekly have been at each other’s throats for years. In 2008, the Weekly won an antitrust suit against its rival, with a jury issuing a verdict that the Guardian had engaged in illegal predatory pricing with intent to harm the Weekly. The Weekly was awarded $21 million in that case; the two sides settled in 2011.”

    Doh! It was the other way around. The Guardian sued the Weekly and was awarded $21 million.

    • http://www.facebook.com/camille.taiara Camille Taiara

      No sh*t. My god, Brooks, you can’t get your most basic facts straight? This is what happens when there’re no competing voices left in the media: sloppy reporting.

    • Jon Brooks

      Thanks for pointing out this fundamental error. It’s been corrected. Apologies.

Author

Jon Brooks

Jon Brooks writes mostly on film for KQED Arts. He is also an online editor and writer for KQED's daily news blog, News Fix. Jon is a playwright whose work has been produced in San Francisco, New York, Italy, and around the U.S.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor