The San Francisco Board of Supervisors will soon vote on an ordinance that restricts the police department's relationship with the FBI. On Thursday, the Public Safety Committee approved the Safe San Francisco Civil Rights ordinance. Introduced by Supervisor Jane Kim, it urges – but does not require – the police to amend or terminate their agreement with the FBI. The SFPD, however, says the ordinance is unnecessary, as officers who work with the joint task force "remain in the chain of command and under the supervision of SFPD and must comply with Department policies at all times." (Read the full statement below.)
The legislation comes after supervisors learned a few months ago that, under an agreement with the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force, San Francisco police officers have interviewed people about their religious practices and political speech -- without reasonable suspicion of any crime.
At the hearing yesterday, John Crew of the ACLU charged that the partnership between the SFPD and FBI is a departure from standard criminal practice, and unacceptable. He said, “nobody in San Francisco or California decided to throw away our standards and take our local police officers and turn them into national security agents.”
Nasrina Bargzie, a lawyer with the Asian Law Caucus, said that in 2001, after she told friends she opposed the war in her native Afghanistan, officers contacted her and arranged an interview at a Concord Starbucks. Holding back tears, she testified, “this ordinance matters because based on the standards that applied to the FBI today, anybody could be subjected to the treatment I was."
The ordinance is slated for a reading and Board vote on March 13th.