Update 9:20 a.m. Some might consider this rather muted response from Barbara Boxer, one of the more environmentally friendly members of the Senate, an indication of the defensive posture even California Democrats are taking these days:

“I strongly believe that protecting air quality based on the science leads to more job growth because it brings so many positive health benefits to our workers. Although I am disappointed with this decision to delay action, I am heartened by the President’s commitment to vigorously oppose any efforts to dismantle the Clean Air Act and the progress that we have made.”

On the other hand, California air quality standards are already more stringent than federal standards.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama on Friday sacked a controversial proposed regulation tightening health-based standards for smog, bowing to the demands of congressional Republicans and some business leaders.

Obama overruled the Environmental Protection Agency and directed administrator Lisa Jackson to withdraw the proposal, in part because of the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and uncertainty for businesses at a time of rampant uncertainty about an unsteady economy.

The announcement came shortly after a new government report on private sector employment showed that businesses essentially added no new jobs last month — and that the jobless rate remained stuck at a historically high 9.1 percent.

The withdrawal of the proposed regulation marks the latest in a string of retreats by Obama in the face of Republican opposition. Last December, he shelved, at least until the end of 2012, his insistence that Bush-era tax cuts should no longer apply to the wealthy. Earlier this year he avoided a government shutdown by agreeing to Republican demands for budget cuts. And this summer he acceded to more than a $1 trillion in spending reductions, with more to come, as the price for an agreement to raise the nation’s debt ceiling.

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, had muted praise for the White House, saying that withdrawal of the smog regulation was a good first step toward removing obstacles that are blocking business growth.

“But it is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to stopping Washington Democrats’ agenda of tax hikes, more government ‘stimulus’ spending, and increased regulations, which are all making it harder to create more American jobs,” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said.

The withdrawal of the proposed EPA rule comes three days after the White House identified seven such regulations that it said would cost private business at least $1 billion each. The proposed smog standard was estimated to cost anywhere between $19 billion and $90 billion, depending on how strict it would be.

Republican lawmakers have blamed what they see as excessive regulations backed by the Obama administration for some of the country’s economic woes, and House Republicans pledged this week to try to block four environmental regulations, including the one on some pollution standards, when they return after Labor Day.

But perhaps more than some of the other regulations under attack, the ground-level ozone standard is most closely associated with public health — something the president said he wouldn’t compromise in his regulatory review. Ozone is the main ingredient in smog, which is a powerful lung irritant that occasionally forces cancellation of school recesses, and causes asthma and other lung ailments.

Criticism from environmentalists, a core Obama constituency, was swift following the White House announcement.

“The Obama administration is caving to big polluters at the expense of protecting the air we breathe,” said Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters. “This is a huge win for corporate polluters and huge loss for public health.”

In his statement, the president said that withdrawing the regulation did not reflect a weakening of his commitment to protecting public health and the environment.

“I will continue to stand with the hardworking men and women at the EPA as they strive every day to hold polluters accountable and protect our families from harmful pollution,” he said.

The decision mirrors one made by Obama’s predecessor, President George W. Bush. EPA scientists had recommended a stricter standard to better protect public health. Bush personally intervened after hearing complaints from electric utilities and other affected industries. His EPA set a standard of 75 parts per billion, stricter than one adopted in 1997, but not as strong as federal scientists said was needed to protect public health.

The EPA under Obama proposed in January 2010 a range for the concentration of ground-level ozone allowed in the air — from 60 parts per billion to 70 parts per billion. That’s about equal to a single tennis ball in an Olympic-size swimming pool full of tennis balls.

Jackson, Obama’s environmental chief, , said at the time that “using the best science to strengthen these standards is a long overdue action that will help millions of Americans breathe easier and live healthier.”

Obama has scheduled a primetime speech to a joint session of Congress and the nation next Thursday night to outline plans he has made for combating high joblessness and spurring economic growth.

Obama Withdraws EPA Proposal to Tighten Smog Regulations 2 September,2011KQED News Staff and Wires

  • ray

    I am a day Care Center Worker.Many of my students come with inhalers because of asthma.I heard that is is too costly for young children and seniors whom have breathing problems for our nation to enforce clean air regulations. It just does not seem fair that our little people have to breathe polluted air from school busses and our public busses,and other forms of transportation.,from CO2emissions,and fuels that pollute our atmosphere. The elderly have the same problems. I thought President Obama would fight for us. I am so disappointed.Too many young children have respiratory problems. Their little lungs get filled with pollution and bad allergens . They can not breathe. I feel sad about the choice President Obama made today about the enforcement of the EPA regulations on huge corporations. Good Luck in Receiving my vote.

  • ray

    I am a Teacher!
    We have circle time. I review our classroom rules by using “MAT MAN” “Handwriting Without Tears” Anyways we build “Mat Man” with Wooden Pieces. The students and I discuss the rules in our classroom everyday! If a student does not make a good choice then he or she needs to take a break. When the student is ready to be a part of our group again I tell her or him I love him and I am glad he is making a good choice.

    A teacher can have the best lesson plans but if you have students misbehave,nothing can be taught. Even though a Teacher wants to run the class as a democratic unit,it is not.
    When you President Obama give your speech on Thursday Night, you are a Teacher as well as an Educator.If some People in Congress laugh or snicker at you, Just stop and wait, and ask nicely if they remember the decorum or the high ethics of being a member of Congress. If they can not behave,tell them teachers would not accept their behavior in their classroom and you will not tolerate their behavior either.Tell them to take a break and they can join you when they choose to exhibit good manners.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor